collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban  (Read 19404 times)

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9094
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #15 on: September 14, 2012, 11:00:02 PM »
I somewhat agree and I wished the WDFW could really manage wolves because I think they could, but the wolf groups have a choke collar around their neck just as they did in ID/MT and everytime WDFW make a move the wolfers don't like they are going to pull on the choke collar. Have you noticed how cougar complaints have dropped off in the NE corner. A lot of locals have told me they are tired of calling and not getting meaningful help. They say they just take care of the problem. Even our legislators say that people have lost faith and are taking care of things themselves. It's sad to see but that's what people are being forced to do.

This is what happened in Idaho, stop in any town over there and talk wolves, for many people season never ends. I hate to see this happening to wildlife management, but tell me this, do people like the McIrvins have any other choice if the system fails them? Eventually people will react to survive!

Yes, people will react to survive and what other choice do they have but will it be enough?
I don't think so.
I'm sure people in ID and MT have been shooting wolves when they get the chance plus wildlife services has removed quite a few and still they increase in number and proliferate.
Hell, even the opening of a legal hunt in MT didn't stem the increase. In ID where they went all out hunting and trapping I doubt if the total number of wolves will decrease, maybe stabilize.
In WA even if they go off the Endangered List that will only open them up to hunting. Not enough!
Same with cougar. We can hunt them all we want but without hounds not enough!
I've seen game dwindle away here on the Penninsula and the number of hunters with them ever since 655. It ain't going to get better with wolves in the mix.

Only way to turn it around is for the Legislature to overturn 655 and 713 and give WDFW a new direction. I don't see that happening.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline sebek556

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 2603
  • Location: ne,wa
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #16 on: September 14, 2012, 11:22:40 PM »
 :bash: well my friends it's been a fun ride, but I think the train will reach the station in the next few years. Talked to a warden today, and of course got on the topic of wolves. When she was expressing to me how great they were for the environment, I called Bs. When I asked her what she was going to do when she was out of a job because the game herds will no longer support hunting, she laughed and said oh they will still need us, we will always have jobs. That comment scared me the most, the brain washing has reached the lowest levels in the WDFW. They have them convinced that hunters can be removed and still have their job, only easier cause they won't be bother with the task of checking licenses anymore.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3480
  • Location: west coast
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #17 on: September 15, 2012, 01:25:05 AM »
imo there is too much money involved for the wolf pop to get crazy,anybody ever been on a yote hunt with a helicopter ? fish and game can control the wolfs population all the way down to zero if they please..look at the other states as a history lesson....wolfs came..game herds dropped...hunters left..then open wolf season..theres no reason to think it would be different in wa..

also if open wolf season doesnt help with pop control theres no reason to think that fish an game wont go to the next level...they need our money !

Offline RG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 791
  • Location: Thorp
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #18 on: September 15, 2012, 04:46:02 AM »
WDFW is already stripped down to a skeleton crew of enfocement people due to the governor's and legislature's budget cuts.  They will continue to be cut because the politicians don't see it as all that important in the eyes of their constituents and in their reelection quests.  The politicians and citizens from wolf-affected areas unfortunately don't carry enough clout to influence the overall state level decisions.  Even as cut as they are, one warden on the road in region 4 for example, the philosophies of the agency still aren't changing in favor of the sportsmen and women who have always supported them and financed them.  WDFW and the commission seem to be like the bull walking around with their nose in the cow's behind.  I work with some of the enforcement people, to say they are discouraged would be an understatement.
And I think God must be a cowboy at heart
 He made wide open spaces from the start
 He made grass and trees and mountains and a horse to be a friend
 And trails to lead ol' cowboys home again

Chris Ledoux...

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #19 on: September 15, 2012, 04:52:38 AM »
:bash: well my friends it's been a fun ride, but I think the train will reach the station in the next few years. Talked to a warden today, and of course got on the topic of wolves. When she was expressing to me how great they were for the environment, I called Bs. When I asked her what she was going to do when she was out of a job because the game herds will no longer support hunting, she laughed and said oh they will still need us, we will always have jobs. That comment scared me the most, the brain washing has reached the lowest levels in the WDFW. They have them convinced that hunters can be removed and still have their job, only easier cause they won't be bother with the task of checking licenses anymore.

I have been told the same thing in the past by enforcement...and they are right. They will always have jobs. There will always be poachers and game violations to investigate even if we can't legally hunt.




Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6057
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #20 on: September 15, 2012, 05:48:28 AM »
:bash: well my friends it's been a fun ride, but I think the train will reach the station in the next few years. Talked to a warden today, and of course got on the topic of wolves. When she was expressing to me how great they were for the environment, I called Bs. When I asked her what she was going to do when she was out of a job because the game herds will no longer support hunting, she laughed and said oh they will still need us, we will always have jobs. That comment scared me the most, the brain washing has reached the lowest levels in the WDFW. They have them convinced that hunters can be removed and still have their job, only easier cause they won't be bother with the task of checking licenses anymore.

I have been told the same thing in the past by enforcement...and they are right. They will always have jobs. There will always be poachers and game violations to investigate even if we can't legally hunt.


 Now I understand why they want every agency to have legal (not by the constitution) LEO, since when that happens their chances of catching their own bullet will magnify greatly.
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline BOWHUNTER45

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 14731
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #21 on: September 15, 2012, 06:01:20 AM »
I guarantee I will never stop hunting and thats a fact ..I best not even go no further with this .. :bash: :bash: :dunno:

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38437
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #22 on: September 15, 2012, 06:52:50 AM »
There are a lot of good comments here and I think most everyone is somewhat correct, put all these comments together and I think that is our situation.

I do think that as wolves move into other areas of the state and educate people about their real impacts that public opinion will begin to sway. We had some people in Stevens County that used to think wolves would be OK. Now that wolves are here and the impacts are being felt I don't hear anyone supporting them anymore. The ones that still do are being pretty quiet.

It won't be too many years and there will be wolves hitting the suberbs of pugetropolis looking for cats, dogs, or maybe a lone jogger. Once pugetropolis feels the real wolf impact, then things will change, hopefully there will be something left to salvage in the rest of the state.

One thing that would help change current policy is to elect candidates in November who will offer stronger support for hunting.

Rob McKenna   (supports gun ownership, sources tell me he will support hunters)
Reagan Dunn   (is a hunter, see Workman's writeup)
Mark Harmsworth   (gun owner I have spoken with that will support hunting, endorsed by sports groups, running against Dunshee)

I know there are others, maybe someone else can add to this?
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Killmore

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 754
  • Location: Ellensburg WA
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #23 on: September 15, 2012, 08:10:31 AM »
Bearpaw is correct about once the wolves show up on the westside that will start to change there minds. Once a pack shows up at tiger mountion(highway 18) that will get alot of attention. Have you seen how many people hike-ride bikes in that area...this will be very interesting

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50471
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #24 on: September 15, 2012, 08:15:24 AM »
Quote
hopefully there will be something left to salvage in the rest of the state.

THis may be bleak but the only reason the wolves will show up in town is that the rest has already been destroyed.   Its too bad the majority doesn't have a clue.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38437
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #25 on: September 15, 2012, 08:44:39 AM »
Quote
hopefully there will be something left to salvage in the rest of the state.

THis may be bleak but the only reason the wolves will show up in town is that the rest has already been destroyed.   Its too bad the majority doesn't have a clue.

Unfortunately, you are exactly correct, hunger will drive them into town, they will be simply trying to survive.

In all honesty, I don't blame the wolves, I blame the people who want them where they don't fit into the modern ecosystems we have in most of Washington.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50471
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #26 on: September 15, 2012, 08:49:21 AM »
Curious to see what happens in the Valley this winter.   Apparantly the pack showed up back on the Golden doe or neighborhood already.   That is unseasonably early.   Of course at the same time I was in them at 7,000 feet 30 miles away :chuckle:    I assume they were looking for food.  I don't know

Offline Killmore

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 754
  • Location: Ellensburg WA
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #27 on: September 15, 2012, 11:24:01 AM »
So when a pack shows up at oak creek or for that matter any of the elk feed stations, will the game department take any action.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50471
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #28 on: September 15, 2012, 12:10:28 PM »
THere was one at Joe Watt/Robinson this spring along with a cougar.   The elk all bugged out and it was assumed it was overzealous shed hunters. :dunno:

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38437
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: It's Washington rural v. Seattle urban
« Reply #29 on: September 15, 2012, 12:18:22 PM »
I'm pretty sure there is a provision in the Wolf Plan that if wolves impact herds by 25% (I think that was the number) they can take management action.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

DIY Ucluelet trip by CP
[Today at 05:48:15 AM]


Burrowing Animal by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 08:22:55 PM]


Oregon spring bear by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 08:03:28 PM]


Oregon Seed #'s by Doublelunger
[Yesterday at 07:35:15 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by hunter399
[Yesterday at 04:38:43 PM]


Black Eagle arrows deals by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 02:02:59 PM]


2025 Multiseason Deer General? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 12:23:10 PM]


Last year putting in… by Dirtnap
[Yesterday at 11:48:14 AM]


Colorado Results by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 10:20:27 AM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Special T
[Yesterday at 10:19:28 AM]


Tag issues with "Get Outdoors" package by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 08:54:30 AM]


.300 Win Mag Rounds by W.Goomsba
[Yesterday at 08:29:32 AM]


Shout out to Talley Manufacturing by EnglishSetter
[May 26, 2025, 09:56:57 PM]


Knight ridge runner by Irish_hunter93
[May 26, 2025, 09:43:04 PM]


Halibut fishing by hiway_99
[May 26, 2025, 08:10:49 PM]


Desert Sheds by aer212
[May 26, 2025, 07:21:58 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal