collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf tracks ONP?  (Read 1881 times)

Offline blacktailcody

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 579
  • Location: PA, WA
Wolf tracks ONP?
« on: September 20, 2012, 11:28:28 AM »

Offline 358NM

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 49
  • Location: Central Washington
Re: Wolf tracks ONP?
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2012, 11:50:26 AM »
I'll bite.

A wildeyed guess.
A large, size of track and depth of track.
Young, definition and sharpness of track.
Domestic dog, again definition and length of toe nails.

All the wolf tracks I have seen in Idaho while elk hunting have lots of wear to the toe nails and damaged pads and usually a bit larger.

Still just a guess.

Offline CastleRocker

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 1018
  • Location: Castle Rock, WA
Re: Wolf tracks ONP?
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2012, 11:52:30 AM »
Depending on the size of your boot, it looks like a wolf track to me. 

I think we are going to go try to get some pics of the three that have been seen hanging around the west side of Mt. St.Helens this weekend.  Hope to at least find some tracks to take pictures of for the non-believers out there.
Work to live, don't live to work.

You can educate away ignorance, sober up drunkenness, but you can't fix stupid.

Offline blacktailcody

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 579
  • Location: PA, WA
Re: Wolf tracks ONP?
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2012, 12:13:18 PM »
My boot size is 11 mens.

Offline leed

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 81
  • Location: Cent Wa
Re: Wolf tracks ONP?
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2012, 04:41:15 PM »
Size isn't always the indicator. Althought it is a good representation of the actual size of a wolf track it has patterns more consistent with a domestic dog than wolf. The spread between the toes and rear pad and width between the two middle toes is not consistent with wolves.
At times it's hard to know based on one track. It is not a good way of saying yea or nay.  If you had both sets, front and rear prints you could tell.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Practical Approach
[Today at 08:17:14 AM]


E scouting for bears by hunter399
[Today at 08:04:13 AM]


That "lake taste" in freshwater fish by hunter399
[Today at 08:01:07 AM]


90's Yamaha no telltale? by MeepDog
[Today at 07:51:27 AM]


Bear Scratch on Tree by JWBINX
[Today at 06:58:38 AM]


RDS Scope ring height by blackpowderhunter
[Today at 06:05:07 AM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by bowguy
[Today at 05:59:49 AM]


No trespassing, hunting, fishing signs posted along Skykomish river by Night goat
[Today at 04:28:57 AM]


NEED ADVICE: LATE after JUNE 15th IDAHO BEAR by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:52:52 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 09:36:02 PM]


Grayback Youth Hunt by Big6bull
[Yesterday at 08:20:59 PM]


Pocket Carry by fly-by
[Yesterday at 06:35:19 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 05:36:47 PM]


SWAKANE EWE by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 02:55:45 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 02:44:10 PM]


Video highlighting and discussing WDFW corruption by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 01:42:41 PM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Yesterday at 01:23:41 PM]


What barrel length 24”, 26” or 28” by Call em in
[Yesterday at 12:47:43 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 12:38:05 PM]


PROOF RESEARCH CLOSEOUT by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:35:23 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal