Free: Contests & Raffles.
The ignorant rhetoric makes me want to vomit.
Here's the response from Sen Cantwell. Unfortunately, no surprises here:Dear Mr. W,Thank you for contacting me regarding the tragic shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. I appreciate hearing from you on this important issue. All Washingtonians and all Americans offer our deepest condolences to the families of the 20 children and six school staff members who were killed in this senseless attack. Our thoughts and prayers are with the community of Newtown, as its residents heal from this incomprehensible tragedy.This horrific attack highlights several issues that must be addressed promptly in order to better protect against such inexplicable violence. We need to get powerful assault weapons off our streets. And we need to strengthen services for the mentally ill and their families. In the past, I supported the original Assault Weapons Ban and the Brady Bill, as well as the Youth Handgun Safety Act of 1993, which prohibits juveniles from possessing or receiving handguns. I look forward to work with my colleagues in the Senate to strengthen responsible legislation to rein in gun violence. We need to work to close the loopholes in existing laws that allow criminals and children to gain access to firearms contrary to the law's intention. One example is the well-known "gun-show loophole" which allows people to purchase firearms at gun-shows without undergoing the background check required when guns are bought from licensed dealers. Lastly, I believe we must support increased gun-safety and gun-use education.I support the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding Washingtonians who own guns. I also remain focused on addressing the deeply troubling violence in this country and making our state and our country as safe as possible for all people, including our most vulnerable citizens, our children. I believe both of these goals are important and can be simultaneously accomplished through common-sense gun laws and stricter enforcement of existing laws.Along with addressing gun violence, making services for the mentally ill and their families more accessible will encourage those suffering from mental illness to seek needed care and support. Mental health care is a critical component of our healthcare system and an individual's overall health status. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, approximately one in 17 Americans suffers from a seriously debilitating mental illness. I care deeply about mental health care and understand the important role behavioral health services play in the lives of both those suffer from mental illness and their family and loved ones. Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts on this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of further assistance.Sincerely,Maria CantwellUnited States Senator
Has anyone ever talked to a representative on the phone or ever received a personal response besides the form letter in an email??I've emailed on a few occasions on several issues and have received obvious form letter responses. I seriously doubt they even read anything that's sent to them, really p!sses me off
. I, along with many others, received your form letter response concerning gun control. I'm curious, did you even read the letter I wrote? I included factual evidence from the Center for Disease Control's "Deaths: Final Data for 2009" that shows firearm related deaths to be a fraction of the total deaths in our country. Furthermore, according to a US Department of Justice study "Firearm Use by Offender" published 4 November 2001 "Fewer than 1 in 50 State and Federal inmates used, carried, or possessed a military-style semiautomatic or a fully automatic gun during their current offense." You can find this information and a full description of what were considered military-style weapons on page two of the study.I find it hard to reconcile some of your statements in the letter I received. You write "we need to get powerful assault weapons off our streets" and just two paragraphs later write "I support the Second Amendment and the rights of law-abiding Washingtonians who own guns." How are these two statements compatible? You want to ban the possession of firearms and somehow think you still support the Second Amendment? Please enlighten me on how that is possible.I would like a response that is not a form letter. In fact, I would like to hear your rebuttals to my points so that I might believe you're at least trying to represent the interests of the citizens of Washington not your personal opinions.
When our Representatives receive multiple communications on the same topic, they tend to create their form letter that will let you know where they stand on the issue whether it aligns with your position or not. However, if they receive great volumes of communications that do not align with their view, they may change their position since they are supposed to represent their constituents. Keep writing and remember to be respectful.
As discouraging as it is, form letters/emails are fairly common, but at least you know your communication was received and categorized.
Quote As discouraging as it is, form letters/emails are fairly common, but at least you know your communication was received and categorized. I'm hoping for at least a tally of pro vs anti to help show the where the populace stands. I still don't think her stance will be swayed, even if she received 80% support for no gun control.