collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .338 VS .50  (Read 7976 times)

Offline yorketransport

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3310
  • Location: Yelm
  • Preferred pronouns: were/was
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2013, 05:08:53 PM »
I had an AR-50 for a very short time. Picked it up with a Nightforce BR scope for $2700, so I couldn't pass it up. It was a great gun, well made, and was beautifully accurate. It just wasn't fun to shoot though. Recoil isn't a problem but the muzzle blast was terrible. It was sold after about 1 month and 200 rounds.

Unless you need an anti-material rifle, get the 338. You'll shoot it more and it will be just as effective for 90% of the shooting you'll likely do.  :twocents:

Andrew

Offline jjhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 2262
  • Location: Mule Deer Country
  • Aim small. Miss small.
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #16 on: February 05, 2013, 05:23:17 PM »
That is a smoking deal!

Offline jaymark6655

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 1911
  • Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2013, 05:34:27 PM »
My vote is for the .338.  Its cheaper, lighter, and has a magazine which means faster follow up shots.  I think the .338 is a more accurate long range round than the .50.  Example 300 WM sniper rifles have to print groups that are much tighter than a 50 sniper rifle to be considered acceptable.
20 Zardoz Points!

"That's the reason we pay $25 for a recoil lug made by a professional instead of one for $0.50 made by Micheal J Fox using a dremel!"

"Women should be treated the same as a French Rifle, dropped at the first sign of trouble."

"Fair is a meaningless word taught to young children."

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14545
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2013, 06:09:09 PM »
If you plan to carry while hunting, I would recommend the .338 LM.  The AR-50 is heavy to begin with and gets heavier and heavier away from the vehicle.  Most gun cases aren't long enough for the AR-50, so it has an allen screw that separates the butt portion of the stock just behind the pistol grip.  Like said above, the recoil isn't bad.  The blast to the shooter isn't all that, but everything around gets blown around or knocked over. 

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9626
  • Location: Spokane
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2013, 11:51:14 PM »
Ill have one of those savages hopefully next week :tup:

Offline Jim the Plumber

  • Local Legend
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 469
  • Hunting trespassers from the air
    • http://precisiontactical.co/
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #20 on: February 06, 2013, 10:15:21 AM »
I have both a 338L ( Custom Rbros rifle) and a Barrett 50BMG. I have also owned 2 of the AR50's. It is a big, cumbersome rifle.The two cartridges don't overlap. For most applications, the 338 is the better option.
 You can load the 50 for around $1.50-$3.50 per round and it does need dedicated reloading gear.
The 338 loads for about the same, less as much specialized gear.
If you want the fire power of the 50, try one of the bull pup styles for more portability. Barrett's 95 and 99. Bluegrass makes the Viper that is also a bull pup.

Offline Mongo Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 855
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Pew Pew lifestyle
Re: .338 VS .50
« Reply #21 on: February 06, 2013, 02:54:00 PM »
Im thinking the .338 is the way to go. I could get the gun and scope for the cost of JUST the .50. Now all I gotta do is convince the wife before my birthday.  :IBCOOL:
Vegetarian: Old Indian word for Bad Hunter.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 10:04:54 PM]


Pocket Carry by bb76
[Today at 08:44:00 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Today at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Today at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Today at 07:58:22 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:07:33 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Today at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal