Central Firearms Offender Registry Legislation Passed 4/17 Update now a Database

[Special T]

I think them removing that line was the main reason why this moved forward.  If they had left it out they might have not passed it. Don't worry once its law they will make a rule change so that it is included.

[csaaphill]

ya probably

[Elkaholic daWg]

Your voices must be heard.  If you have not been continuously writing and calling your represntatives, then you have given up and resigned yourselves to the loss of your rights and freedoms.

LET YOUR VOICES BE HEARD!

Off went another.....

[huntrights]

Thank you.  I hope more people get engaged. 

The incessant political battles can be exhuasting, but we cannot stop pushing back.

[Elkaholic daWg]

3/12 Update

This bill passed the state House today by a vote of 85-10 and now heads to the Senate. Those opposed were: Chandler, Condotta, Crouse, Kristiansen, MacEwen, Overstreet, Pike, Scott, Shea, and Taylor.

 Dan K, Elizabeth S....good job

 
MESSAGE:   
Thank you BOTH for voting against this bill!! I'm pretty sure senator Pearson will vote to kill this thing in the Senate. He is getting a copy of this too 

Pearson voted in favor of the bill in the Law and Justice Committee........

 So he got this this morning....


 I hear you voted for this in committee. Please don't support it on the floor!

Governments and lists have never been a good combination when it comes to liberty, and this Nation and state were created with Liberty and freedom as the number 1 goal. This bill is a BAD idea heading our state down the slippery slope of tyranny. Liberals don't care.
 Just how long before the "loaded firearm in vehicle" is re included in this. Just including that as  an offense qualifying for this "list" in the original bill shows how a" low information voters" mind works

 
 And I received this.....

Jim

 

Just a quick note to let you know that while on the floor today Sen. Pearson wrote you a substantive reply with his thoughts about 1612.  I dropped it in the mail to you this afternoon.

 

Sincerely,

Cameron

 

 

C.M. Bailey

Senior Legislative Assistant to Senator Kirk Pearson

115 Irv Newhouse Building

360-786-7676



 Kind of sounds like he still likes it

[csaaphill]

not much is going to move this away from being a law i fear, but at least we tryed.

[bigtex]

4/17 Update

The bill passed the Senate today with the following senators voting against: Becker, Brown, Ericksen, Holmquist Newbry, Honeyford, Pearson, and Smith

There is one change to the bill in the senate. Instead of it being a "registry" it is now a "database"

[csaaphill]

what? huh how does that change anything? + don't thye already keep a database?

[bigtex]

what? huh how does that change anything? + don't thye already keep a database?

Sounds better

[csaaphill]

 

[Elkaholic daWg]

4/17 Update

The bill passed the Senate today with the following senators voting against: Becker, Brown, Ericksen, Holmquist Newbry, Honeyford, Pearson, and Smith

There is one change to the bill in the senate. Instead of it being a "registry" it is now a "database"

Pearson eh? He did send me a letter saying how he thought at the time (justifying his committe vote) that it wasn't a problem for  us Law abiders.I wonder why he changed? Did the bill change?

[bigtex]

4/17 Update

The bill passed the Senate today with the following senators voting against: Becker, Brown, Ericksen, Holmquist Newbry, Honeyford, Pearson, and Smith

There is one change to the bill in the senate. Instead of it being a "registry" it is now a "database"

Pearson eh? He did send me a letter saying how he thought at the time (justifying his committe vote) that it wasn't a problem for  us Law abiders.I wonder why he changed? Did the bill change?

No change.
It's not all that uncommon for a rep/senator to vote for it in committee then against in the full vote.
Many times the committee is more of a personal opinion vote while the full house vote is a party line vote.

[Elkaholic daWg]

4/17 Update

The bill passed the Senate today with the following senators voting against: Becker, Brown, Ericksen, Holmquist Newbry, Honeyford, Pearson, and Smith

There is one change to the bill in the senate. Instead of it being a "registry" it is now a "database"

Are there 2 pearsons in the senate Tex?

[bigtex]

4/17 Update

The bill passed the Senate today with the following senators voting against: Becker, Brown, Ericksen, Holmquist Newbry, Honeyford, Pearson, and Smith

There is one change to the bill in the senate. Instead of it being a "registry" it is now a "database"

Are there 2 pearsons in the senate Tex?

Nope I messed up in my reply message to ya  . Pearson voted for in committee, against in full vote

[Elkaholic daWg]

4/17 Update

The bill passed the Senate today with the following senators voting against: Becker, Brown, Ericksen, Holmquist Newbry, Honeyford, Pearson, and Smith

There is one change to the bill in the senate. Instead of it being a "registry" it is now a "database"

Are there 2 pearsons in the senate Tex?

Nope I messed up in my reply message to ya  . Pearson voted for in committee, against in full vote

 THNX!