Free: Contests & Raffles.
I think each and every one of us should be sending a thank you to Senator Rand Paul.
Link to thank Senator Rand Paul:http://www.paul.senate.gov/?p=contactWrite your U.S. Senators and Representatives as well; ask them if they support drone strikes on Americans on American soil.
No offense, but infowars is the last place I would go to for legitimate news.In regards to the "light armored tanks" everyone is concerned about, I tend to believe this logical explanation (I know, I shouldn't, as there are facts that are hidden from everyone, so I can't rely on facts that are evident but trust in the unknown and assume the worst).http://littlegreenfootballs.com/page/294634_Factchecking-_Obama_DHS_Purcha
I think the root question is: Does the Administration believe they have the authority to use the military against US citizens on US soil?From their statements it sounds like they do believe that.This is one of the major concerns the founding fathers had. Everyone should be concerned today despite your political leanings. Once a precedent is set, rarely is it repealed.Don't be sidetracked by drones, drones are a tool. We must look at the people using the tool, the military complex. It should also be noted the administration is constantly expanding the definition of enemy combatant, terrorist, etc. to include fringe thinkers. Groups that are currently not hostile to the government but are opposed to their policies.
The army was not used, it was gathered and marched but not used. My understanding is Hamilton imposed the tax, people refused to pay, Washington was sent to "collect".It also is a first example of the same thing going on now. Statists vs individualist. On a positive side the right to assemble was unchallenged by the federalist/statists after that.
I should state that the use of the term "combatant" was probably not appropriate on my part. The actual language states "engaged in combat."