Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: AspenBud on March 28, 2013, 03:54:10 PMMy point is the same regardless and I guess I should have rephrased it. The sooner wolves are in all three units and achieving their goal the sooner we can manage them.I'm not saying we have to like it, but I think this is how it plays out.I agree but I'm still curious about where wolves actually have to be in order to meet the requirements of the plan. Will there need to be a breeding pair on the Olympic Peninsula, for instance?
My point is the same regardless and I guess I should have rephrased it. The sooner wolves are in all three units and achieving their goal the sooner we can manage them.I'm not saying we have to like it, but I think this is how it plays out.
There are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist.
page 27 of the wolf plan shows the map for the 3 zones... you could read it as they just need to get south of I90 and that would count for the southern cascades/Northwest coast.
Quote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist.
Wolves need confirmed ASAP.
Quote from: bearpaw on March 28, 2013, 04:14:43 PMQuote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist. Again, where is the proof?
Pictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...
QuotePictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...Okay, so those will be included in the same zone as the Wenatchee, Teanaway, and Lookout packs (North Central.)What I'm more interested in is confirmation of wolves on the west side, that are within the south cascades/northwest coastal zone.
“State biologists and enforcement officers dissected the dead cow in Pitcher Canyon on Tuesday with the ranchers present. Monda said they did not find any puncture holes, crushing bruises or internal bleeding that are characteristic of wolves or other predators having killed an animal.Something did eat the cow, but all evidence indicated that it was fed upon after it died,” he said. “But there was no sign of a scuffle, no torn-up ground, no blood. There was absolutely no sign that it was killed by a predator of any kind.”Ross Hurd, the rancher who owns the cattle with his two brothers, said he disagrees with the agency's conclusions. He said the agency's investigators talked about the path of the struggle over some 30 yards, and the disturbed ground, and the bloody wound on the back of the cow's neck. He also said he understands that the agency needs specific evidence to confirm it was a wolf kill, but he doesn't understand how the agency can conclude a wolf did not kill his cow.For now, he's more concerned about wolves still lingering on his ranch. This morning, a wolf came right through their calving area, traveling up through their lowest field from below. They were able to chase it away, he said.
Quote from: bobcat on March 28, 2013, 04:15:14 PMQuote from: bearpaw on March 28, 2013, 04:14:43 PMQuote from: boneaddict on March 28, 2013, 03:56:43 PMThere are already wolves on the west side, so I really don;t think you are going to have to worry about it. But why would you need to believe me, I'm not a paid WDFW biologist. Again, where is the proof?Pictures and locations of the Nooksack wolves have been sent to region 4 again...