collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Tribal hunting bills introduced  (Read 75674 times)

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10632
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #315 on: February 26, 2013, 04:11:29 PM »
Rep Blake made a floor amendment to the enforcement bill. The amendment would:

  • Require the Attorney General's Office to create a training module on treaty hunting rights for general authority officers, and what they should do when given a tribal ID.
  • Every WDFW Officer would be required to take this course EVERY year and it must be at least 4 hours long

Offline haugenna

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2217
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #316 on: February 26, 2013, 06:54:07 PM »
No vehicle access? 

I know they were presenting the bill as "nothing changed" but we all know that a gate on a road is going to restrict vehicle access.  I think that is what most of us are concerned with.

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10632
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #317 on: March 08, 2013, 04:31:57 PM »
The Enforcement bill passed the House on 3/6 and is now in the Senate. The vote had both Democrats and Republicans voting in favor and the sole Democrat who voted in opposition was Stonier.

All current and former law enforcement officers who serve in the House voted in oppostion, with the exception of D-Chris Hurst (Enumclaw, Bonney Lake).

Those who voted in opposition: Buys, Chandler, Condotta, Crouse, DeBolt, Haler, Hargrove, Harris, Hawkins, Hayes, Holy, Hope, Klippert, Kretz, Kristiansen, Magendanz, Manweller, Orcutt, Overstreet, Pike, Schmick, Scott, Shea, Short, Stonier, Taylor, and Vick

Offline alwaysontop

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: Yelm
  • Groups: NRA
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #318 on: March 19, 2013, 10:04:18 PM »
I didn't want to read all 13 pages so I don't know if I am repeating anything but I want to put my 2 sense in.  Who should Indians have hunting rights to state land when they don't even pay state taxes and I know for a fact it they get keys to locked gates their wont be a discover pass in the windshield.

Offline splitshot

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2054
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #319 on: March 19, 2013, 10:27:59 PM »
if the season is closed it is closed,period.  if the road is closed it is closed,period.  what part of closed dont i know?   sooner or later someone will be shot.    mike w

Offline Bigtine96

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 1165
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #320 on: March 21, 2013, 05:27:13 PM »
if the season is closed it is closed,period.  if the road is closed it is closed,period.  what part of closed dont i know?   sooner or later someone will be shot.    mike w

 :yeah:

Offline hardkorrhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 313
  • Location: Darrington
  • Groups: NAHC
Re: Tribal hunting bills introduced
« Reply #321 on: April 04, 2013, 07:27:13 PM »
Its a nation with in a nation and its bs.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal