collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Portland's ban on loaded guns is constitutional, Supreme Court says  (Read 4619 times)

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Portland's ban on loaded guns is constitutional, Supreme Court says
« Reply #15 on: August 18, 2013, 08:38:53 AM »
Is there any recourse for the citizens of Portland to get this obviously poor ruling overturned?  I imagine not.  It's worse than NY City's law restricting firearms to be loaded with no more than 7 bullets.  It is simply unbelievable......... :o

Yep. Move.

Simple.  :)

Offline csaaphill

  • Anti Hunters are weird animals.
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9611
  • Hunting is non-negotiable it's what I do!
  • Groups: G.O.A., Rocky Mountain ELk Foundation
Re: Portland's ban on loaded guns is constitutional, Supreme Court says
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2013, 02:07:31 AM »
I just wonder when we will see an up rising in this country ...things are getting worse by the minute , not by the hour  :dunno:
:yeah:
"When my bow falls, so shall the world. When me heart ceases to pump blood to my body, it will all come crashing down. As a hunter, we are bound by duty, nay, bound by our very soul to this world. When a hunter dies we feel it, we sense it, and the world trembles with sorrow. When I die, so shall the world, from the shock of loosing such a great part of ones soul." Ezekiel, Okeanos Hunter

Offline turkeyfeather

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 5131
  • Location: Stevens County
  • Groups: NWTF
Re: Portland's ban on loaded guns is constitutional, Supreme Court says
« Reply #17 on: August 21, 2013, 04:45:30 AM »
I'd like to know what the 12 exceptions are.
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation. Your character is who you actually are while your reputation is merely who others think you are.

Offline xd2005

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 1745
  • Location: Port Angeles
Re: Portland's ban on loaded guns is constitutional, Supreme Court says
« Reply #18 on: August 21, 2013, 09:57:27 AM »

I'd like to know what the 12 exceptions are.

http://www.portlandonline.com/auditor/index.cfm?a=332592&c=28514

C.  The following are exceptions and constitute affirmative defenses to a violation of this Section:
 
1.  A police officer or other duly appointed peace officers, whether active or honorably retired.
 
2.  A member of the military in the performance of official duty.
 
3.  A person licensed to carry a concealed handgun.
 
4.  A person authorized to possess a loaded firearm while in or on a public building under ORS 166.370.
 
5.  A government employee authorized or required by his or her employment or office to carry firearms.
 
6.  A person summoned by a police officer to assist in making arrests or preserving the peace, while such person is actually engaged in assisting the officer.
 
7.  A merchant who possesses or is engaged in lawfully transporting unloaded firearms as merchandise.
 
8.  Organizations which are by law authorized to purchase or receive weapons from the United States or from this state.
 
9.  Duly authorized military or civil organizations while parading, or their members when going to and from the places of meeting of their organization.
 
10.  A corrections officer while transporting or accompanying an individual convicted of or arrested for an offense and confined in a place of incarceration or detention while outside the confines of the place of incarceration or detention.
 
11.  Persons travelling to and from an established target range, whether public or private, for the purpose of practicing shooting targets at the target ranges.
 
12.  Licensed hunters or fishermen while engaged in hunting or fishing, or while going to or returning from a hunting or fishing expedition.
 
13.  A person authorized by permit of the Chief of Police to possess a loaded firearm, clip, or magazine in a public place in the City of Portland.
 
14.  A security guard employed at a financial institution insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation while the security guard is on duty.

Offline turkeyfeather

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 5131
  • Location: Stevens County
  • Groups: NWTF
Re: Portland's ban on loaded guns is constitutional, Supreme Court says
« Reply #19 on: August 21, 2013, 01:03:42 PM »
So it sounds like they mainly just did away with open carry. Unless you of course are a gov't employee.  :rolleyes:  Was open carry legal there to begin with?
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation. Your character is who you actually are while your reputation is merely who others think you are.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25063
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Portland's ban on loaded guns is constitutional, Supreme Court says
« Reply #20 on: August 21, 2013, 01:37:39 PM »
yes
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

New Decoys by Shannon
[Today at 10:36:37 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by trophyhunt
[Today at 10:29:56 AM]


Drew A Bull Moose Tag - 49 Degrees North A, Late hunt NOV 1st- NOV 30th by Buckblaster
[Today at 10:09:13 AM]


Aquapod/Sneak boat by Big G
[Today at 09:57:53 AM]


Animal sounds at Game Commission Meeting, Wow by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:55:34 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by millerwheeler
[Today at 09:35:17 AM]


GMU 530 bear prospects by redi
[Today at 09:00:15 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by bigboy
[Today at 08:55:28 AM]


Second Chance Bull by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Today at 08:48:31 AM]


Any buck clarification by hunter399
[Today at 08:17:28 AM]


More special privileges by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:45:41 AM]


Any success Pearrygin / Chewuch Quality hunters? by Onlybucks
[Yesterday at 11:13:24 PM]


WWF launches public campaign "Not my WDFW" to oust Director Susewind by RC
[Yesterday at 07:28:50 PM]


Pearygin Quality by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 06:38:57 PM]


Fishing the East Cape in Baja? by Elkman
[Yesterday at 06:28:54 PM]


Hunting by Republic/Ferry county by Jimmer
[Yesterday at 06:00:16 PM]


The Mysterious $200,000 by Caseyd
[Yesterday at 12:10:37 PM]


Grizzly? by The Gobble-stopper
[Yesterday at 11:20:01 AM]


mushroom id on a hemlock by The Gobble-stopper
[Yesterday at 11:10:47 AM]


Making memories by pashok23
[Yesterday at 10:40:31 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal