collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks  (Read 49365 times)

Offline baldopepper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 2608
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #120 on: October 31, 2013, 08:58:57 AM »
Keep in mind one of the most poweful groups looking at this issue are the gun control people.  If they can limit hunting opportunities they are also limiting the hunter population which, in the long run, will limit the amount of gun owners. I have no statistics, but I'm guessing that a very large proportion of gun owners own their gun only to go hunting with.  We seem to have no problem jumping to our feet and grabbing our wallets when a gun control issue comes up, but we only cry in our beer and whine when hunting opportunities fall by the wayside. Wonder how many hunters out their would be willing to pop out $20-$30.00 per year to an organization that simply lobbied for hunter rights.  I firmly beleive that in the long run that is what it is going to take to be honestly heard in Olympia (or DC for that matter).

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #121 on: October 31, 2013, 09:49:10 AM »

Clarke's philosophy, if you and others are correct, has been replaced by a more narrowly-focused campaign to turn Washington into a utopia for tree huggers and predator lovers, with hunters footing the grocery and access bill.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/about/mission_goals.html

'back then' the animals were managed to support people, now the people are managed to support the animals.

Offline hub

  • Port Orchard
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 106
  • Location: port orchard,Wa.
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #122 on: October 31, 2013, 12:25:03 PM »
Dave, you made a remark that is quite true regarding hunters against hunters. I can state a glaring example of that. Most of eastern Wa. allows any bull tag holders to shoot any bull. They usually start hunting before the general spike only season and continue hunting until the end of the general season. Essentially they can shoot spikes on there bull tag if they choose  Telling a bulltag holder it is unfair to general tag holders for them to kill our spikes causing instance disagreements. If a hunters has to wait 7 to 8 years to draw a any bull tag he is going to shoot any bull rather than eat tag soup. The situation is grossley unfair and causes dissention. A bull tag holder that waited many years for the tag should be allowed to hunt big bulls after the general season closes. Spikes should be legal for none bull tag holders only. The rules do a fine job of pitting hunters against hunters. Problems such as this are very fixable. Yet hunters will not band together and force the game dept to stop being stupid. By the way I have visited eastern during the early bull tag season to see what is going on. They do shoot spikes before the general season starts. Yes there are issues that are not easy to fix. There are issues that  could be fixed easily and should be. 

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #123 on: October 31, 2013, 12:53:17 PM »
Hub, wow that's a new one to me. I see that as a non-issue. I think that's the problem- people making things into issues when they're not.

Offline Dave Workman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 2957
  • Location: In the woods, by the big tree
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #124 on: October 31, 2013, 05:33:16 PM »
Hub, wow that's a new one to me. I see that as a non-issue. I think that's the problem- people making things into issues when they're not.

The REAL problem is that you see it as a "non-issue."

Anything that creates friction between hunters so that they take their eyes off the ball is an issue, and part of the problem, that being a divided hunting fraternity that is competing against one another rather than joined together to focus their energies on the agency and its management scheme.

Baldopepper is also onto something: that anti-hunters and anti-gunners are soul mates. 
"The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted." - D.H. Lawrence

Offline hub

  • Port Orchard
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 106
  • Location: port orchard,Wa.
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #125 on: November 01, 2013, 12:00:23 AM »
Good point Dave.I see it the way you see it.  I do not believe the law should allow any bull tag holders to kill spikes. The spikes should be left for the general elk season only. To me it is common sense. Why would I want to hunt an area for spikes when the bull tag holders already killed half those elk a week earlier. The law itself does not pass a basic sanity check.  The reddot road closure system is essentially another bad law that does not pass a basic sanity check. If a hunting area supports enough animals to have an open hunting season why is necessary to limit access and close many of the access roads within the area. The game dept decided that additional animal escapment is essential on areas open the public, on public land. Hmmmm. Sounds to me  like the game dept. does not want us to have legal and normal access for the pupose of killing animals during a legal open hunting season. I think it is a criminal act to close access roads to prevent hunters from killing game on public land. I,m sure some will disagree with my opinion. However this is another example of an anti hunting management tool used to limit hunting access. Certainly this issue does pit hunter against hunter as opinions vary widely. I say the problem is state officials that feel they have the legal right to close roads during hunting season . I think the state is wrong. They are violating my legal right to hunt using normal and legal transportation on public land. Closing roads is denying access and is therefore illegal, in my opinion of course.  I do understand why increasing numbers of Wash. hunters choose to hunt  other states . The reasons are clear to me. Regards to all-Hub

Offline csaaphill

  • Anti Hunters are weird animals.
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9606
  • Hunting is non-negotiable it's what I do!
  • Groups: G.O.A., Rocky Mountain ELk Foundation
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #126 on: November 01, 2013, 12:46:08 AM »
Habitat Loss
Ok no doubt there is habitat loss in Washington, but there are also some other factors at work on our herds because you can visit many remaining winter ranges that have very few animals on them in the winter. We do not even have enough deer to utilize the remaining winter range so there must be other factors reducing our deer herds.

What Has Really Changed In Deer/Elk Mortality?
According to WDFW documentation since 1997 hunter harvest has averaged from 7000 to 9000 elk annually and 30,000 to 40,000 deer annually. This hunter harvest is not significantly different than the previous couple decades. So what else is changing, why do we all think there are fewer deer?

Overall Predator Numbers!
The bottom line is that coyotes, cougar, bear, and wolves eat deer and elk. WDFW has cut back cougar seasons and purposefully expanded, in fact nearly doubled cougar populations in Washington and WDFW is now working toward fulfilling the most liberal wolf plan of any western state. Additionally, trapping and hunting of coyotes has been drastically reduced due to trapping bans and decreased fur markets. Once wolves multiply and decimate certain elk herds as they have historically done in ID/MT/WY then this conversation will arise again and certain people will blame everything except the predators they are in love with. Only people who are capable of performing elementary school math will be able to decipher the true reason for the decline in the herds.

Cougar Predation
Cougar are my favorite animal to hunt so I would never want to see them eliminated, but we have too many cougar and no matter what some people may try to say that cougar do not impact herds, they are either lieing or sadly uninformed. Numerous studies have shown that one cougar eats from 25 to 50 deer per year. In areas with more elk than deer cougar tend to make elk their diet instead of deer.

A NE Washington Cougar study found that the cougar annual kill rate on deer was from 7 days to 11 days.

Cougars in NE Washington
http://www.carnivoreconservation.org/files/thesis/cruickshank_2004_msc.pdf
Quote
Across the study area and within The Wedge, cougars selected for mule deer over white-tailed deer during the year. When examined seasonally, cougars strongly selected for mule deer during the summer but not during the winter, and in no season or location did they select for white-tailed deer. The annual kill rate of 7 days for cougars falls within the range of 7 to 11 days reported by other investigators (Hornocker 1970, Beier et al. 1995, and Murphy 1998). The interval may be at the low end because 15 of the 22 intervals were from female cougars with kittens, which typically show a higher kill rate than single adults (Murphy 1998). Only 2 intervals were from a male cougar (8 and 11
days
). We found no differences in habitat characteristics between mule deer and whitetailed deer kill sites.

WA Cougar Population and Impacts On Herds
WDFW said at the Colville Wolf Meeting there are likely 3500 to 4000 cougar in Washington (as compared to 2000 estimated population a few decades ago). Therefore according to these statistics from a NE WA cougar study the 1500 to 2000 additional cougar WDFW has in WA are eating anywhere from 49,772 to 104,285 more deer (or substituting elk) than cougar ate when the cougar population was estimated at 2000 animals a few decades ago.

Coyotes Lead Way in Deer Deaths
http://www.jsonline.com/sports/outdoors/115154119.html
I think most people will agree that the coyote population has increased. According to studies that are underway in several Midwest and eastern states, coyotes have a significant impact on deer numbers.
Quote
In all, 57 adult deer and 44 fawns have been captured and fitted with tracking devices.

The data are from Jan. 1, 2009 through Aug. 31, 2010. Though preliminary, they are showing some very interesting results.

Coyotes in the study area were responsible for 13 fawn mortalities, followed by bobcat (9), unknown predator (5), abandonment (4), unknown agent (3), black bear (2), vehicle collision (2), wolf (2) and bald eagle (1).

Among adult and yearling female deer, coyote killed 6, followed by wolf (3), black bear (2), drowning (2), birthing complications (1), vehicle collision (1) and unknown predator (1).

Bear predation on Elk in Idaho
http://www.wildlifemanagementinstitute.org/PDF/12-Elk%20and%20Predation....pdf
Quote
During 1973 to 1975, neonatal calf survival from birth to October 1 averaged 37.5 percent. Predation by black bears was the primary proximate cause of mortality (Table 3). In 1976, 75 black bears were removed from the study area. Calf survival increased to 67 percent, then approximated preremovallevels 2 years later. Calf-to-cow ratios (an index of recruitment) from aerial surveys showed a similar pattern (Schlegel 1986). Concurrently, the trend in calf-to-cow ratios was similar in surrounding GMUs, where the bear population was not reduced, compromising interpretation of these results (Schlegel 1986). Nevertheless, these data suggest that predation by black bears is additive and can be a significant factor limiting elk recruitment and population growth.

Wolf Impacts on Elk/Deer
I know we have some wolf lovers on the forum but they cannot refute the statistics provided by other western states and published in the WA Wolf Plan. Unless my memory is mistaken, the plan states that each wolf kills an average of 44 deer or 17 elk per year. Wolf impacts have not been felt in most areas of Washington yet because we have not reached our population objective. However, simple math and WDFW wolf plan statistics tell us that 15 breeding pairs which translates to roughly 150 wolves on the ground will consume 2550 elk or 6600 deer per year. That sounds like wolves might possibly fit in if hunters give up a few deer and elk from our annual harvest. However, Idaho's wolf plan called for 10 breeding pairs and they ended up with nearly 800 documented wolves. If Washington's wolf plan is as overly successful as Idaho then our 15 breeding pairs may translate into as many as 1200 wolves that will eat 20,400 elk or 52,800 deer per year.

What's In Store In The Future
I have provided the statistics on predation, they are facts not speculation. How WDFW continues to manage predators will determine the future of our herds. If WDFW continues to increase predator numbers, the increased cougar, bear, coyote, and wolf numbers are statistically bound to have an effect on hunting in Washington.

It doesn't matter how much summer range or winter range you have, if the animals are being eaten the summer range and winter range will not get fully utilized. Herds will decline regardless of how much blame biologists and the WDFW try to pin on every other factor. Perhaps some elk herds have increased in the last decade but deer are declining and when there are no deer the predators will be forced to eat elk so the elk numbers will decline if predator numbers continue to increase.  :twocents:
Just wanted to bring this back on track myself. This kind of thing very well could be the culprit. Now I know warm sunny days have contributed to not seeing much in the name of elk this year; it has rained a couple of days this elk season. I haven't seen mush sign at all. Went to Pomeroy last Sunday walked down over the hill and seen maybe one small set of Cow elk tracks. Seen just the other day on a long hike one pile of Elk droppings fresh, but not too since it was frosty that morning, and still had frost on it. maybe should of still followed it but didn't so sue me lol. My point is Last year only seen one lone cow elk this year nothing except some sign that wasn't that fresh. Did see one heck of a pile of what looked like wolf dung though. Meaning huge bleeping pile not this small two three logs but 6-8 inch long and 10-12 individual logs in one pile so wolf sign then? or just two or three coyotes in one spot?
Even in the summer time when driving around you usually see at least two or three cows off the side of the road, and nothing this year at all.
Only seen in the Elk 2013 forum only a few reports of spikes being gotten.
Truly some big ones in areas where you can still hunt big bulls without a permit, but still seems less than last year.
I wrote last night our region one area some of my ideas on the hunting seasons and gripes I see here. Doing like I said to do write our people in charge of this.
Seems like we warned though when they banned dog hunting for cougers etc... the animal rightists have us where they want us.
"When my bow falls, so shall the world. When me heart ceases to pump blood to my body, it will all come crashing down. As a hunter, we are bound by duty, nay, bound by our very soul to this world. When a hunter dies we feel it, we sense it, and the world trembles with sorrow. When I die, so shall the world, from the shock of loosing such a great part of ones soul." Ezekiel, Okeanos Hunter

Offline RG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 791
  • Location: Thorp
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #127 on: November 01, 2013, 07:28:31 AM »
I agree with many of the points stated here  it occurs to me also, based upon conversations with friends at WDFW, that they, the designated experts, are actually not allowed to provide an opinion on a lot of topics.  Hound hunting and baiting for bear and cougar for example. When that issue was coming up for a vote the department people said right then that it was going to cause a predator management crisis but they were not allowed to express an opinion even though the animal rights opinion was being spread far and wide. I am also aware that the opinion of biologists and wildlife managers is often sent up the chain of command then totally ignored by those who make the final decisions on policies. I know for a fact that the WDFW people with boots on the ground firmly believe Washington is headed for a serious wolf crises at some point. That opinion is quashed and never allowed to be officially expressed.  I was probably too harsh in my comments about biologists earlier and I will admit that.  I stand by those criticisms but should have directed them toward those upper level people who influence the final decisions.  I also still firmly believe that those with the training and experience must have the final say on policy decisions not those with the money and influence like it is now.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2013, 07:42:54 AM by RG »
And I think God must be a cowboy at heart
 He made wide open spaces from the start
 He made grass and trees and mountains and a horse to be a friend
 And trails to lead ol' cowboys home again

Chris Ledoux...

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #128 on: November 01, 2013, 08:44:02 AM »
Okay, this spike issue- as I said, I never thought of it as being an issue. I like the 'any bull' option for someone who waited years to draw a bull permit. Most guys aren't going to take a spike anyway. But it's a good option to have if it comes down to your last day to hunt. They could take a spike anyway during the general season. Again, this is really a non-issue. I've never seen it mentioned on this site until now.

As for the "red dot" roads- there's no such thing. It's the Green Dot system, meaning only roads with green dots are open for motorized vehicles. This restriction, in certain areas, along with the spike only general season, is needed to keep success rates low, while allowing the state to sell an unlimited number of elk tags.

If we want a better, higher quality elk hunting experience, with good road access into hunting areas on public lands, we need to go to elk hunting by permit only and do away with the general spike seasons altogether.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline csaaphill

  • Anti Hunters are weird animals.
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 9606
  • Hunting is non-negotiable it's what I do!
  • Groups: G.O.A., Rocky Mountain ELk Foundation
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #129 on: November 01, 2013, 07:25:47 PM »
Okay, this spike issue- as I said, I never thought of it as being an issue. I like the 'any bull' option for someone who waited years to draw a bull permit. Most guys aren't going to take a spike anyway. But it's a good option to have if it comes down to your last day to hunt. They could take a spike anyway during the general season. Again, this is really a non-issue. I've never seen it mentioned on this site until now.

As for the "red dot" roads- there's no such thing. It's the Green Dot system, meaning only roads with green dots are open for motorized vehicles. This restriction, in certain areas, along with the spike only general season, is needed to keep success rates low, while allowing the state to sell an unlimited number of elk tags.

If we want a better, higher quality elk hunting experience, with good road access into hunting areas on public lands, we need to go to elk hunting by permit only and do away with the general spike seasons altogether.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've seen many times on here where people were griping about spike only units!
Peole have left off hunting or elk hunting here for that very reason!
I do remember seeing those welcome hunters signs think it was in the Missery Mt area above Pomeroy.
and no we don't need to go to permit only for elk people will quit all together then and then we should all know who wins then? wont be us that's for sure but brocalli eaters and such :twocents:
"When my bow falls, so shall the world. When me heart ceases to pump blood to my body, it will all come crashing down. As a hunter, we are bound by duty, nay, bound by our very soul to this world. When a hunter dies we feel it, we sense it, and the world trembles with sorrow. When I die, so shall the world, from the shock of loosing such a great part of ones soul." Ezekiel, Okeanos Hunter

Offline hub

  • Port Orchard
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2011
  • Posts: 106
  • Location: port orchard,Wa.
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #130 on: November 03, 2013, 12:22:31 AM »
Bobcat,thanks for correcting my error. The road closure system is the green dot. I posted red in error. I was probably seeing red with discust when I posted red. Oh well. The game laws on page 94 reference the so called Northwest study that triggered the road closure system. I went to  our state game web sight and read the information regarding those studies. For the life of me I cannot connect the dots leading anyone to believe road closures during hunting season is what those studies indicated. The same studies were provided to game officials in other states. I would bet Governor Otto from Idaho shreddded the entire publication as garbage. I notice the Idaho game laws do not have a road closure program like we do. Anyway I,ll quite griping about road closures in our state since that will not change untill someone files a law suit against the state for illegal road closures based on a non scientific study that does not prove the case. Just wait untill wolves increase on the eastside. Thats when the real serious problems will begin.  :bash: :bash: :bash:

Offline Sitka_Blacktail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 3395
  • Location: Hoquiam, WA
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #131 on: November 03, 2013, 09:21:24 AM »
Hub, you'd be wrong about the Governor of Idaho ripping the study to shreds. Here's the Idaho State Elk Technical Report.

https://collaboration.idfg.idaho.gov/WildlifeTechnicalReports/Elk%20Statewide%20PR11.pdf

Go right to page 1 which is the Statewide Summarry and you'll see this "Elk can be classified as habitat generalists, but they still have certain basic habitat requirements; food, water, and, where hunted, hiding cover and security areas (blocks of
elk habitat with limited access)." and this.............

"Access into elk habitat is a primary problem facing wildlife managers today. Roads and motorized trails built into elk habitat for timber management and other activities increase hunter access and often increase elk vulnerability to harvest."

"Elk habitat is reduced not only by the amount of land taken by the roads themselves, but also because elk tend to avoid areas adjacent to such roads and motorized trails."

And this........

"Because human access into elk habitat is the primary problem associated with roads and motorized trails, perhaps the most critical habitat management factor facing wildlife managers is the use of roads and motorized trails. A comprehensive road and motorized trail management program, involving key elements including timing of construction activities, limitation on use of some roads for single-use only (i.e., timber removal), and complete or periodic closures of other roads and motorized trails to create large blocks of habitat with non-motorized access, could do much to benefit elk management."

This report is full of other good information too.
A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears. ~ Michel de Montaigne

Offline Buzz2401

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1207
  • Location: Shelton
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #132 on: November 03, 2013, 08:19:33 PM »
   I personally think the WDFW does a great job of managing hunters and game.  Are success numbers low, ya but the only way success numbers will go up is to have limited number of hunters.  I would like to see big game hunting go to a limited draw instead of unlimited otc tags.  The only thing I don't like about hunting washington is the amount of people during the general seasons. Hunting pressure is what makes hunting in washington so hard. I regularly see 10-20 spikes the week or so before the general rifle season opens but as soon as the droves of people hit the woods it becomes very hard to find elk.  Most people I know that put in alot of time in the woods and hunt hard have regular success, those that don't aren't so "lucky".  I love hunting Washington and don't plan on quiting anytime soon.  Just got home from another successful elk season and can't wait to hunt Washington next year. Washington is a beautiful state and I cherish everyday I get to spend out in its woods, unfortunately I got to go to work tomorrow in the big city, but I assure you I will be day dreaming of hunting elk in Washington.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9635
  • Location: Spokane
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #133 on: November 03, 2013, 10:14:30 PM »
I'd like to see mule deer go to permit..there are western states that have half our population of people and 3x the habitat that are permit only. Id also like to see us pick our deer tags east or west like they do for elk

Offline huntrights

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 1701
Re: An 'ex-WA elk hunter' speaks
« Reply #134 on: November 04, 2013, 03:28:28 AM »
 :twocents:

2013 Elk Hunt

After a week of hunting elk in “prime” Washington elk habitat, no elk were harvested by any of the several experienced hunters in elk camp during the modern firearm general elk season.  A legal elk in the GMUs would have been a spike or antlerless with the proper permit.  The descriptions of the good old days sounds like the way it should be.  However, the current situation is far different.  What happened?  The story seems to be the same from many hunters.

Here are some of the very consistent comments:

•   The season is too early; this is the primary complaint from many hunters.  When the modern firearm general elk season was during the first half of November, the winter storms had started to push elk herds to lower elevations where hunters had reasonable access to the migrating elk.  The earlier, much warmer season only gives hunters the possibility of harvesting from a much smaller population of year-round resident elk.
 
•   Road closures and decommissioning (destruction) of roads has limited and/or impaired hunter access into hunting areas.

•   Camping areas have been closed which limit where hunters can camp and park their vehicles.

•   Restrictive regulations have made hunting elk more difficult to succeed.  Specifically: True spike and spike can be difficult to identify as legal at typical modern rifle distances (100 +/- yards).  The chances of success were equated to the lottery.

•   There are too many categories of hunts based on antler growth and gender: Any bull, any elk, spike bull, true spike bull, 3 point minimum, antlerless. 

•   The modern firearm general elk season is preceded by archery elk, muzzleloader elk, special permit elk, and deer hunts.  The remaining resident elk are very spooked by the time the general modern firearm season comes around.

•   It can take many years to get drawn for a special/quality hunt; this is discouraging.

•   The WDFW does not seem to be working to accommodate hunters.  The changes in regulations and season schedules appear to be geared toward maximizing revenue versus providing reasonable opportunities for hunter success that result in maintaining healthy elk populations.

Hunting elk in Washington seems to be more complicated and difficult than it is in other states with significant elk populations.  Many hunters that are Washington residents have become ex-Washington elk hunters because of the reasons stated at the beginning of this thread and the list given in this post.  It might help to communicate the many complaints and concerns to the WDFW and request that they simplify the regulations and schedule the seasons in such a manner that maximizes hunter success while ensuring that healthy elk populations are maintained.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Nevada bull hunt 2025 by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 03:20:09 PM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 01:32:20 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by highside74
[Today at 01:27:51 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by lonedave
[Today at 12:58:20 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by washingtonmuley
[Today at 12:00:55 PM]


MA 6 EAST fishing report? by washingtonmuley
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


Kings by Gentrys
[Today at 11:05:40 AM]


2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal