collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Forest Service Law Enforcement Hindered by Inadequate Budget...2015 UPDATE  (Read 9402 times)

Offline snowpack

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2522
  • Location: the high country
BT, overall did it create more government positions?  Under the old system were there additional employees at each district to handle the LEO affairs or the same group of people there now? 

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
BT, overall did it create more government positions?  Under the old system were there additional employees at each district to handle the LEO affairs or the same group of people there now?
There are only about a third of USFS LEOs now as there were in the early 90s. As an example, in the 90s each Ranger District in WA had at least one LEO. Now there are more Ranger Districts then there are LEOs, and a lot of Ranger Districts were combined in the late 90s. So now in WA there is less than one LEO per district statewide. I know an LEO in E WA covering three districts, and they aren't slow areas either.

Now as far as I know, USFS as an agency has also seen an overall decline in personnel numbers.

The only federal land management agency that has seen their LEO numbers increase is BLM. NPS is down by about 15% since 2000 and USFWS is down by 50%.

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6080
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
The farther it is from bottom to top breeds inefficiency, politics,  and trust issues :twocents:
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
We can all respect a chain of command, its the tiers in the chain of command that appear excessive, not the make up.

Offline washelkhunter

  • Region 5 State Delegate #3
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 3549
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Site sponsorhttp
  • Groups: TPE, NRA, RMEF, AST
You all have to remember, USFS LEO's was a "created" position.

When first introduced to us in the Methow district, it would be "paid" for from the sales of "wood premits" aka Firewood!!  "if not enough sales of permits, the position would be eliminated"   AND you thought government LYING to its citizens was something new!!

All "Problems" have a beginning, that is where you have to start to find a solution.

Like a snowball rolling down hill, from there!

Geee, I wonder what happened to the USFS "revenue" oh ya, its been going up in smoke of decades now instead of being turned into 2x4's !!!


There ya go!   :yeah:

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
We can all respect a chain of command, its the tiers in the chain of command that appear excessive, not the make up.
How is it excessive?

For the USFS you have an special agent in charge (SAC) who covers one USFS region and reports to LE Director, there are 10 regions. An Assistant SAC is under the SAC and supervises a group of Special Agents (detectives/investigators) and several Commanders. Under the ASAC are several Commanders which supervise the patrol aspect of a specific part of a region. Under the Commander you have a Patrol Captain who supervises officers on numerous forests.

So for example a USFS Officer in Cle Elum reports to the Captain who supervises USFS LEOs on the Okanogan-Wenatchee and Colville National Forests. This Captain reports to the Commander for WA. The Commander for WA reports to the ASAC who then reports to the SAC.

In comparison to WDFW where you have Chief>Deputy Chief>Captain>Sergeant>Officer

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6080
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Rather have the county Sheriff take care of it and keep it close to home myself :yike:
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
Rather have the county Sheriff take care of it and keep it close to home myself :yike:
County/state officers cant enforce USFS regulations unless there is an applicable state/county law, and in most cases there isn't an applicable law.....

Offline Heredoggydoggy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 5041
  • Location: Wenatchee
  • Team I'M TOO OLD FOR THIS $H!T !
This doesn't just effect Forest Service LE personnel, but also county sheriff's.

Most county sheriff's in this state that have USFS lands receive funding from the USFS to have sheriff deputies patrol USFS lands, as an example about 25% of the Skamania County Sheriff's Office is funded by the USFS. So you can imagine those contracting funds from the USFS to Sheriff's will decrease as well.

So not only will there be less USFS LE personnel in the woods, there will be less Sheriff's Deputies as well.


Well I would venture to guess that USFS  LE would be a better  place for federal  tax dollars to go  than This damn thing here!!

SWAT stands for "Special Weapons And Tactics".  I wonder if any of these guys know any Tactics?  :chuckle:
If it was easy, everybody would be doing it.

When Bernie Madoff did it, it's called a "Ponzi Scheme"
When Government does it, it's called "Social Security"

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10656
The Fiscal Year 2015 budget request (begins Oct 1) for the USFS includes a 10% increase for the National Forest System at a cost of $144 million.

HOWEVER

USFS Law Enforcement is again looking at another self initiated cut to it's law enforcement program. USFS LE is looking at a 1% CUT at the cost of approximately $1 million.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Selkirk bull moose. by vandeman17
[Today at 03:52:30 AM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 03:39:08 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by carpsniperg2
[Yesterday at 11:36:21 PM]


Desert unit 290 October buck hunt by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 10:55:13 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 09:54:25 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by mikey549
[Yesterday at 09:17:05 PM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by D-Rock425
[Yesterday at 09:11:38 PM]


Rock creek gone? Next? by D-Rock425
[Yesterday at 09:01:52 PM]


Color phase fox by redi
[Yesterday at 08:58:03 PM]


49 DN Moose Success by Alchase
[Yesterday at 08:47:37 PM]


Selling Pistols and rifles by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 07:02:19 PM]


Possible record bull? by Whitefoot
[Yesterday at 06:32:40 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 06:16:20 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by ljsommer
[Yesterday at 04:40:12 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by ljsommer
[Yesterday at 04:38:38 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 03:44:09 PM]


CWD drop off station- What a joke! by Stein
[Yesterday at 03:08:22 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 12:35:52 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 12:04:23 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by cavemann
[Yesterday at 10:11:36 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal