Do not mis understand. I did not say dwight,chuck and Frank have a floating anchor. YOU DID

Frank does not have a floating anchor, He uses a different place for his string to contact. Infact I do not think any of the top teer archers have a floating anchor at all. It would be impossible to shoot the consistant scores they do if it was floating.You would get a different view on uphill,Downhill and sidehill. Not touching your nose does not make it floating.
Maybe we should clarify. As long as you have atleast 2 reference points for your anchor it is not floating. Reo did and does touch his nose with the string. Like I said some have an amazing amount of natural talent. Dave cousins touches his face in a different place because he shoots a very long draw length for his height. I do not know anyone else who could pull that off. What I was saying is it is more consistant to have multiple anchor points with the string and 99.99% of the top tear archers in the WORLD do exactly that. TOUCH THEIR NOSE
There is quite a difference between shooting animals and 3D targets than spots. Your bow can be out of tune,You can misjudge the yardage,Punch the trigger and flinch and you may still get a 10 on a 3D animal or even kill a real one. BUT when you are given the distance have to cut for slope and bubble for wind and make 2 or even 4 shots in the same target spot you need to be consistant. I have shot with the top pro's from all over the world. I have only seen 2 that do not touch their nose with the string. Dave Cousins and Tim Gillingham. It is acheivable with just about any compound bow and still have great form. The average Male archer is 5'-10 " tall. with the bows on the market today even the parallel limb bows it is very doable. It is better and more consistant why not set it up that way. Especially for the beginning archer?