Free: Contests & Raffles.
DNR definitely wouldn't be the agency to do anything about herbicide use. It seems to me the WDFW should be able to do the studies necessary and follow through with restrictions on herbicide use if deemed necessary. But, seeing how they've ignored the issue all along, I won't hold my breath. I would expect that the Department of Ecology might have the capability of looking into the problem, if the WDFW refuses.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: bobcat on April 21, 2014, 07:46:36 PMDNR definitely wouldn't be the agency to do anything about herbicide use. It seems to me the WDFW should be able to do the studies necessary and follow through with restrictions on herbicide use if deemed necessary. But, seeing how they've ignored the issue all along, I won't hold my breath. I would expect that the Department of Ecology might have the capability of looking into the problem, if the WDFW refuses.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkhttp://agr.wa.gov/Lawsrules/
When all of the state's politicians are receiving money from big timber, to whom will they listen? The Department of Ecology and the DFW are both staffed by officials appointed by those politicians. Reports which put big timber in a bad light are not going to be well received.
I believe RMEF has put something like $18K into the research efforts. The money was originally turned down by the DFW a couple of years ago and they accepted it just this year.
What needs to happen is plaster this all over the web and media, especially the media, show them a video of what has happened and SHOW THEM THEIR LEGS AND HOOVES, nothing stronger than video proof, and just tell them straight up that herbasides and pesticides are the culprit
I'd like to first understand why this potential cause has not been considered. I do not believe that RMEF would deliberately try to ignore a potential cause. I have a hard believing WDFW would either.Let's hear it, WDFW: why not?