Free: Contests & Raffles.
I have been a critic of tribes and their hunting and fishing practices for years. I have twice recently come across tribal biologists from the Muckleshoot tribe while they were involved in mule deer surveys. I spoke at length to their biologist this week and learned they are spending tens of thousands of dollars in a joint project with WDFW to study mule deer mortality in Washington. WDFW has no funding available to do the study so they stepped up and paid the bill and supplied the people and equipment. The results have already provided a lot of valuable information that would not have come to light. I may not be a fan of tribal hunting and fishing practices in our state but I absolutely have to give them credit for their commitment to this effort which will benefit all mule deer hunters in Washington. I think it is important to give credit where credit is due sometimes.
Quote from: CAMPMEAT on April 16, 2014, 05:44:56 PMThe tribes do better than our WDFW because, they CAN, do something about something. Unlike our WDFW, that has to go through Conservation Northwest and all of the other liberals monies to get an OK to do anything about anything. I have never bitched about the tribal seasons, or anything else, because we weren't here when any treaty was signed.Neither were they...
The tribes do better than our WDFW because, they CAN, do something about something. Unlike our WDFW, that has to go through Conservation Northwest and all of the other liberals monies to get an OK to do anything about anything. I have never bitched about the tribal seasons, or anything else, because we weren't here when any treaty was signed.
Quote from: chinookie23 on April 17, 2014, 04:32:15 PMQuote from: GUscottie on April 17, 2014, 12:35:57 AMQuote from: bigtex on April 16, 2014, 06:06:35 PM Is it hair loss, predators, poaching, low pregnancy rates ...... nobody knows hence the study. Nobody knows huh? How convenient that you left out the slaughter of mature bucks after December 1st!
Quote from: GUscottie on April 17, 2014, 12:35:57 AMQuote from: bigtex on April 16, 2014, 06:06:35 PM Is it hair loss, predators, poaching, low pregnancy rates ...... nobody knows hence the study.
Quote from: bigtex on April 16, 2014, 06:06:35 PM
RG, sorry, but I am not inclined to give the muks credit. They are attempting to lay claim to a hunting heritage based upon showing "anthropological evidence" that they hunted there in the past, at the same time as they discredit the anthropological evidence that Kennewick man predated all tribes of this state. They argue that they were here first, therefore nobody that follows can have the same privilege. They claim not to know why deer or elk herds are in decline? Really? We do not need a casino funded tribal biologist to come to his grand conclusion that mule deer are Indian property and that white man should stop hunting them so that they can be harvested by "natives" in sweat pants and t-shirts, for ancient tribal ceremonies and so they can sell jerky on Craigs list; and enter antler competitions at sportsman shows. Sorry, not going to give them credit for anything. If I were king I would break these treaties and allow the tribes the privilege of competing for work, paying taxes, and standing in line with the rest of us, not going to the front. I surely will not give them any credit where it is not deserved.
they dont have 1 guy killing 10-20 bull elk or deer......