collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING  (Read 29733 times)

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44805
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #30 on: July 09, 2014, 02:04:48 PM »
I don't understand why many government agencies discourage the publics use of herbicides and pesticides on our lawns and gardens to protect salmon and Puget Sound water quality but approve the use of much stronger chemicals in the headwaters.

Follow the money. That's why.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline MarkyMark

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 699
  • Location: Boston Harbor, WA
  • Veteran Paramedic-Firefighter. Greenhorn Hunter
  • Groups: IAFF WSCFF
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #31 on: July 09, 2014, 02:09:24 PM »
Maybe when Susanah Frame is done tearing apart Hanford on TV we could get her started on this... ;)


Tomfoolery Approved

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #32 on: July 09, 2014, 02:23:56 PM »
So we should just poison the forests and let them die. Nice!  :tup: You've made your viewpoint perfectly clear, Idaho. You've made it very clear which side of the issue you support.
Never said that.  Just pointing out the facts.  Wildlife will be subject to whatever risk we humans decide to subject them to.  We could reduce the risk to wildlife by not expanding human development.  We could reduce the risk to wolves by increasing the number of breeding pairs required for de-listing.  We could reduce the risk to elk herds by not issuing damage tags for depredation claims.  Which risks are you wanting to reduce most?  You liberal environmentalists in Vancouver and your crusade against private enterprise never ceases to amaze me.  :bash:
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline bbarnes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: Mt Saint Helens
    • Mt Saint Helens Rescue .com
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #33 on: July 09, 2014, 03:05:28 PM »
No liberal environmentalist here just a very successful hunter,that's NOT against logging but concerned about toxins being spayed.I would love to take you to my propertys,and show you how timber grows just fine without the chemicals.Ive seen the demise of the states elk herd, with the current practice of if a littles good a lot is better.Get a clue about what's going on and quit surfing trying to antagonize the public,that's  trying to raise awareness of the ineptness of the people in charge.If it wasn't for us raising the concern at the  WDFW commission meeting in Moses Lake three years ago, they would have done NOTHING.Whats your contribution to the problem,besides over selling tags in the state? That's only added to the problem by running the elk to death, from September 31 until January 31.It used to be elk was done in the second week of November and then 4 days of late buck and HUNTERS were out of the woods.We need common sense seasons not a bunch of STATE employees trying to get retired doing as little as possible.Im for live animal testing to see what going on here.Remember they have only put 54,000 dollars, in to the BIGGEST WILDLIFE problem the states ever had.whats your suggestion I've heard lots of criticism no solution LETS HEAR IT.  EAT THE SANDWITCH

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44805
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #34 on: July 09, 2014, 05:10:10 PM »
He's shooting in the dark, BB. He's a troll.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline bbarnes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: Mt Saint Helens
    • Mt Saint Helens Rescue .com
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #35 on: July 09, 2014, 05:15:28 PM »
FYI even the conservite party is getting on board looking at what's going on.As a matter of FACT Don Benton gave me a letter that I gave to the FPB yesterday also gave a COPY  to WDFW and THE GOVENOR

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44805
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #36 on: July 09, 2014, 05:22:12 PM »
FYI even the conservite party is getting on board looking at what's going on.As a matter of FACT Don Benton gave me a letter that I gave to the FPB yesterday also gave a COPY  to WDFW and THE GOVENOR

Yes, he sent me a copy. I'm glad my senator got on board.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #37 on: July 09, 2014, 05:38:48 PM »
http://m.inlander.com/Bloglander/archives/2014/07/09/governor-proposes-stronger-water-quality-standards-increased-fish-consumption

The governor is calling for increased water quality standards so that more fish per month can be recommended in our diet.  You'd think he would also be in favor of healthy wildlife in forests in this state.
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #38 on: July 09, 2014, 06:00:23 PM »
No liberal environmentalist here just a very successful hunter,that's NOT against logging but concerned about toxins being spayed.I would love to take you to my propertys,and show you how timber grows just fine without the chemicals.Ive seen the demise of the states elk herd, with the current practice of if a littles good a lot is better.Get a clue about what's going on and quit surfing trying to antagonize the public,that's  trying to raise awareness of the ineptness of the people in charge.If it wasn't for us raising the concern at the  WDFW commission meeting in Moses Lake three years ago, they would have done NOTHING.Whats your contribution to the problem,besides over selling tags in the state? That's only added to the problem by running the elk to death, from September 31 until January 31.It used to be elk was done in the second week of November and then 4 days of late buck and HUNTERS were out of the woods.We need common sense seasons not a bunch of STATE employees trying to get retired doing as little as possible.Im for live animal testing to see what going on here.Remember they have only put 54,000 dollars, in to the BIGGEST WILDLIFE problem the states ever had.whats your suggestion I've heard lots of criticism no solution LETS HEAR IT.  EAT THE SANDWITCH
:rolleyes: So you want to end herbicide use, end hunting seasons because they are too long, end government employment...did I miss anything?

Despite your attempts at spreading vasts amounts of misinformation WDFW is on a solid path to handling this disease as best they can while trying to better understand causes and effects on wild elk populations.  My solution is to support their efforts and provide rationale feedback on ways they can improve.  Your solution seems to be one where you paint yourself as some sort of savior of elk while personally attacking anyone who does not share your view of the problem or potential solutions.  It all revolves around you trying to get your 15 minutes of fame.  WDFW has 15 independent experts providing guidance on a very complex problem and you do nothing but confuse the public with your lies and misinformation which causes WDFW to have to spend time and money dealing with your garbage.  Holding their feet to the fire is one thing...what you are doing is counter-productive and damaging to the states wildlife resources.  I could care less how many popularity contests you might win in various settings, the fact is you are a detriment to solving this problem.  You are a disgrace to how sportsmen should interact with state wildlife agencies and your total lack of respect for everyone that doesn't share your view point must make it hard for anyone with any real authority to take you seriously. 
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #39 on: July 09, 2014, 06:09:49 PM »
No liberal environmentalist here just a very successful hunter,that's NOT against logging but concerned about toxins being spayed.I would love to take you to my propertys,and show you how timber grows just fine without the chemicals.Ive seen the demise of the states elk herd, with the current practice of if a littles good a lot is better.Get a clue about what's going on and quit surfing trying to antagonize the public,that's  trying to raise awareness of the ineptness of the people in charge.If it wasn't for us raising the concern at the  WDFW commission meeting in Moses Lake three years ago, they would have done NOTHING.Whats your contribution to the problem,besides over selling tags in the state? That's only added to the problem by running the elk to death, from September 31 until January 31.It used to be elk was done in the second week of November and then 4 days of late buck and HUNTERS were out of the woods.We need common sense seasons not a bunch of STATE employees trying to get retired doing as little as possible.Im for live animal testing to see what going on here.Remember they have only put 54,000 dollars, in to the BIGGEST WILDLIFE problem the states ever had.whats your suggestion I've heard lots of criticism no solution LETS HEAR IT.  EAT THE SANDWITCH
:rolleyes: So you want to end herbicide use, end hunting seasons because they are too long, end government employment...did I miss anything?

Despite your attempts at spreading vasts amounts of misinformation WDFW is on a solid path to handling this disease as best they can while trying to better understand causes and effects on wild elk populations.  My solution is to support their efforts and provide rationale feedback on ways they can improve.  Your solution seems to be one where you paint yourself as some sort of savior of elk while personally attacking anyone who does not share your view of the problem or potential solutions.  It all revolves around you trying to get your 15 minutes of fame.  WDFW has 15 independent experts providing guidance on a very complex problem and you do nothing but confuse the public with your lies and misinformation which causes WDFW to have to spend time and money dealing with your garbage.  Holding their feet to the fire is one thing...what you are doing is counter-productive and damaging to the states wildlife resources.  I could care less how many popularity contests you might win in various settings, the fact is you are a detriment to solving this problem.  You are a disgrace to how sportsmen should interact with state wildlife agencies and your total lack of respect for everyone that doesn't share your view point must make it hard for anyone with any real authority to take you seriously.

Belittling the P-man isn't helping your viewpoint, you tried that with me on the wolf section and it didn't work there either.  I don't know about everyone else, but I grow tired of how you look down your nose and belittle your fellow hunters when they don't carry your water.

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #40 on: July 09, 2014, 06:24:43 PM »
No liberal environmentalist here just a very successful hunter,that's NOT against logging but concerned about toxins being spayed.I would love to take you to my propertys,and show you how timber grows just fine without the chemicals.Ive seen the demise of the states elk herd, with the current practice of if a littles good a lot is better.Get a clue about what's going on and quit surfing trying to antagonize the public,that's  trying to raise awareness of the ineptness of the people in charge.If it wasn't for us raising the concern at the  WDFW commission meeting in Moses Lake three years ago, they would have done NOTHING.Whats your contribution to the problem,besides over selling tags in the state? That's only added to the problem by running the elk to death, from September 31 until January 31.It used to be elk was done in the second week of November and then 4 days of late buck and HUNTERS were out of the woods.We need common sense seasons not a bunch of STATE employees trying to get retired doing as little as possible.Im for live animal testing to see what going on here.Remember they have only put 54,000 dollars, in to the BIGGEST WILDLIFE problem the states ever had.whats your suggestion I've heard lots of criticism no solution LETS HEAR IT.  EAT THE SANDWITCH
:rolleyes: So you want to end herbicide use, end hunting seasons because they are too long, end government employment...did I miss anything?

Despite your attempts at spreading vasts amounts of misinformation WDFW is on a solid path to handling this disease as best they can while trying to better understand causes and effects on wild elk populations.  My solution is to support their efforts and provide rationale feedback on ways they can improve.  Your solution seems to be one where you paint yourself as some sort of savior of elk while personally attacking anyone who does not share your view of the problem or potential solutions.  It all revolves around you trying to get your 15 minutes of fame.  WDFW has 15 independent experts providing guidance on a very complex problem and you do nothing but confuse the public with your lies and misinformation which causes WDFW to have to spend time and money dealing with your garbage.  Holding their feet to the fire is one thing...what you are doing is counter-productive and damaging to the states wildlife resources.  I could care less how many popularity contests you might win in various settings, the fact is you are a detriment to solving this problem.  You are a disgrace to how sportsmen should interact with state wildlife agencies and your total lack of respect for everyone that doesn't share your view point must make it hard for anyone with any real authority to take you seriously.

Belittling the P-man isn't helping your viewpoint, you tried that with me on the wolf section and it didn't work there either.  I don't know about everyone else, but I grow tired of how you look down your nose and belittle your fellow hunters when they don't carry your water.
KF: Get off your high horse...talk about the pot calling the kettle black  :rolleyes: 



"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline t6

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2009
  • Posts: 527
  • Groups: People opposed to internet liars.... you know who you are.
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #41 on: July 09, 2014, 06:39:49 PM »
Its obvious that it wouldn't matter what evidence or studies were done.  They would not satisfy Idahohunter or WDFW.  As long as they can discredit opponents of their agenda they will continue to spew lies.   

 

Offline jongosch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2014
  • Posts: 90
  • Location: Longview, WA
  • Journalist, Novelist
FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #42 on: July 09, 2014, 06:41:56 PM »
here's a fun little quote for you:

“There probably needs to be another species of bacteria that comes in before the treponemes that allows them entry into the cells.” 

You know who said that?  WDFW veterinarian and epidemiologist Kristin Mansfield yesterday at the Forest Practices Board meeting in Olympia.

So is this other species of bacteria safe for human consumption?  Which bacteria is that exactly?  And does that mean WDFW is now aligning with the many members of their own Technical Advisory Group who believe these bacteria are secondary or even tertiary to larger environmental factors including our forest practices?

Would you like to hear those again?  Okay, great!

“[Treponemes] are possibly playing a role, but they’re not the entirety,” said Jennifer Wilson, a research microbiologist with the USDA.

“I buy the fact that it’s acting like a novel introduced disease.  I’m just saying this treponema data does not support that,” said Tom Besser, a specialist in Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology at WSU.

“I also have a little bit of a concern because the treponema hypothesis still requires an initiating event… Until you figure out what that triggering event was you’re not going to be able to really understand the disease,” said Dr. Anne Fairbrother, an Ecotoxicologist with Exponent Engineering and Scientific Consulting.

“You’re mentioning lots of different bacteria.  That’s one piece of the puzzle… but there are other things that seem to be missing in the puzzle.  Big pieces.  The big pieces are the environmental factors and why this particular region and not other regions,” said Dale Moore, an expert in preventive veterinary medicine at WSU.

And don't forget this one:

Dr. Paul Kohrs, Acting State Veterinarian with the Department of Agriculture, stated that “something must be done different down here with forest practices” and added that “it needs to be explored.”

you know who has been the single biggest detriment to solving this hoof disease problem: WDFW
« Last Edit: July 09, 2014, 09:18:43 PM by jackelope »

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #43 on: July 09, 2014, 06:59:29 PM »
You guys are getting a little absurd with the name calling.  I guess when you don't have facts its all your left with.

WDFW is working to address this issue.  Its complex and herbicides are not the direct cause of hoof rot...even Bob Ferris has told you that.  You guys are out to get your 15 minutes of fame and write your articles, and so its a better story if you can paint yourselves as saviors going up against goliath...I get that.  Its disingenuous and pitiful, but whatever it takes to make a $$ I guess.  The reality is WDFW and their staff are working hard to try and solve this complex problem.  Nothing you are doing is helping our wildlife or helping solve the problem.  Name calling and alienation makes it so that if you do have valuable input it will never be heard by the people that matter.  But again, its very clear you are not here to solve a problem...you guys are here to capitalize on a problem and make a quick buck doing it.   
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3604
Re: FOREST PRACTICE BOARD MEETING
« Reply #44 on: July 09, 2014, 07:07:48 PM »
Its obvious that it wouldn't matter what evidence or studies were done.  They would not satisfy Idahohunter or WDFW.  As long as they can discredit opponents of their agenda they will continue to spew lies.
Studies and facts do very much matter to me...that is why I can't blindly accept your wild leptospirosis theories which have no merit...even though I believe reducing herbicides in the environment would be beneficial.  I don't just put on the blinders and look at one snippet of evidence that confirms my personal beliefs...I look at the whole picture.  You guys are a case study in confirmation bias where you only look for tidbits of evidence that support your biased views and ignore all other evidence. 

I have no agenda.  You are not my "opponent" and I have no personal interest in discrediting you.  But I have spoken directly with Dr. Mansfield on this topic and I do not believe you portray this problem accurately and I do not believe you are helping the wildlife resources of this state and so I'm going to call you on that.  Its really that simple.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Price on brass? by Pete112288
[Today at 12:03:55 PM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 10:28:23 AM]


Utah cow elk hunt by kselkhunter
[Today at 09:03:55 AM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 07:03:46 AM]


Unknown Suppressors - Whisper Pickle by Sneaky
[Today at 04:09:53 AM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 11:25:17 PM]


THE ULTIMATE QUAD!!!! by Deer slayer
[Yesterday at 10:33:55 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 09:41:28 PM]


Oregon spring bear by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:40:38 PM]


Tree stand for Western Washingtn by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 04:37:01 PM]


Pocket Carry by BKMFR
[Yesterday at 03:34:12 PM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Yesterday at 01:15:11 PM]


Range finders & Angle Compensation by Fidelk
[Yesterday at 11:58:48 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 10:55:29 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:40:03 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal