collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: South cascade wolf tracks  (Read 5368 times)

Offline wags

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 839
  • Location: Puyallup/Wrangell
South cascade wolf tracks
« on: August 22, 2014, 11:52:27 AM »
A friend just hiked from Chinook Pass to White Pass on the PCT. about halfway through the trip they encountered these tracks for a short distance along the trail.
I can't wait to see what happens when they finally make it to the western Washington lowlands and all the hobby farms. It should get really interesting and fun then.

Offline TheNoob

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 91
  • Location: Chehalis, Wa
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2014, 11:05:57 PM »
I have talked to a few people that say they have seen them around the Packwood area. In the back parts of their fields in the early morning and said they were much bigger then Yotes and not domestic dogs.

Offline Cylvertip

  • Conservative Heathen
  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 1697
  • Location: Granite Falls by way of Rainier/ Tenino and Dixon, MO
  • Lifetime Member WSTA & NRA
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2014, 03:54:00 PM »
Nephew just came back from elk hunting up on the North side of the Monument.  He said he saw tracks up there.
May that for which I prepare never come to pass.
Don't Tread On Me!

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2014, 04:03:30 PM »
That would be a very small wolf. Even if you have huge hands. My lab has considerably larger paws than that.

Offline TeacherMan

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4407
  • Location: North Idaho
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2014, 08:59:16 PM »
That's totally a wolf track! About 70 lbs most likely. Most wolves aren't the size of a St. Bernard.
If you shoot the first one you will never get that true trophy.

Offline Bigshooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 6367
  • Location: Lewis Co
  • High Wide And Heavy
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2014, 09:30:18 PM »
That's totally a wolf track! About 70 lbs most likely. Most wolves aren't the size of a St. Bernard.

Is there a way to tell the difference between a 70 lbs dog and a 70 lbs wolf track?
Welcome to liberal America, where the truth is condemned and facts are ignored so as not to "offend" anyone


"Borders, language, culture."

Offline mfswallace

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 2653
  • Location: where I be
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2014, 09:32:06 PM »
PCT trail = 99% dog  :twocents:

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18094
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2014, 09:45:27 PM »
That's totally a wolf track! About 70 lbs most likely. Most wolves aren't the size of a St. Bernard.

Is there a way to tell the difference between a 70 lbs dog and a 70 lbs wolf track?

I was wondering the same thing.

(I don't know enough to know if you can tell them apart, but it would be interesting.)
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline Magnum_Willys

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 5602
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2014, 09:59:06 PM »
looks like a dog.... ?

Offline TeacherMan

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4407
  • Location: North Idaho
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2014, 06:57:22 AM »
Generally a wolf track will be narrower than a dog. When I'm on my trapline I also look at what the track is doing. A wolf generally won't stay on the trail (at least in my area) more than 50 yds without darting off a side trail. A dog run off and on a trail but always comes right back.

That's totally a wolf track! About 70 lbs most likely. Most wolves aren't the size of a St. Bernard.

Is there a way to tell the difference between a 70 lbs dog and a 70 lbs wolf track?

I was wondering the same thing.

(I don't know enough to know if you can tell them apart, but it would be interesting.)
If you shoot the first one you will never get that true trophy.

Offline danderson

  • Hunter Education Instructor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 1702
  • Location: Central Wash
    • elkhornarchers
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #10 on: November 17, 2014, 07:07:39 AM »
Here's a wolf track from the Teanaway, my guess would be dog track that you found on the trail, I just hiked from Stampeed Pass to White Pass on the PCT seen a few outfitters with dogs in tow.

Offline TeacherMan

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4407
  • Location: North Idaho
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #11 on: November 17, 2014, 07:18:12 AM »
Here's a wolf track from the Teanaway, my guess would be dog track that you found on the trail, I just hiked from Stampeed Pass to White Pass on the PCT seen a few outfitters with dogs in tow.
.
Very classic dog track. Look how the toes are splayed out.
If you shoot the first one you will never get that true trophy.

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #12 on: November 17, 2014, 07:31:58 AM »
One way to tell a wolf track is the front pad is chevron shaped. But most of the time the back foot steps on the front foot track. Back feet are little smaller than front feet.  Sometimes you have to track them a ways till the step just right and back foot misses front track.
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4502
  • Location: Wet side
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2014, 04:40:10 PM »
I say wolf track on Wags post narrow and more compact not splayed out like a fat domestic dog IMO or just a record book yote   :chuckle: :chuckle:

Offline wags

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 839
  • Location: Puyallup/Wrangell
Re: South cascade wolf tracks
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2014, 07:57:03 PM »
When I originally posted this picture I didn't include the entire story. My friend and his two sons, all of them avid hunters and one of them a trapper since the 80's were about halfway between Chinook Pass and White Pass. The weather had been rainy and miserable, the only people they saw during the trip were a couple of bear hunters near Chinook Pass and a couple of hikers down near White Pass. It had rained all night, they got up, began hiking and ran across these tracks a short time later. The tracks followed the trail a short ways then disappeared. The trail was very muddy, no recent human tracks within  miles.
I think a stray dog in that location would be more than a little unlikely.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 03:21:14 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Today at 02:10:11 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 12:43:12 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal