collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit  (Read 13036 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« on: August 25, 2014, 07:31:13 AM »
Game Dept survey asks whether Margaret should go general season.  Says landowners (aka Weyerhaeuser) want this...  Sounds like Big W wants to sell more access permits for more cash. 

Here's the link.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/regulations/seasonsetting/2015-2017/comments.php

Offline Hunter Dug

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 548
  • Location: Washougal
  • Owner: S&D Skull Works
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2014, 07:37:31 AM »
I think both Toutle and Margret should go general.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3046
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2014, 08:02:52 AM »
I would rather not see either go general.  There is too few "quality" or "bull" hunts as it is on the West side.  Many of the units have already turned to an oil tag and these going general would make long shot tags turn to slim to no chance of drawing. I would rather see the entire state go permit only(severely limiting access permit sales) than more units go general. Winston could be lights out awesome (IMO) if the elk were given a break from the relentless pressure they get during hunting season.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2014, 08:06:30 AM »
Of course weyco wants it general. Why would we want it to go general? We only have a handful of special permits we can put in for on the west side especially for archery and especially in the bull category. Having drawn the tag before I really enjoy having the opportunity to hunt an area with a high concentration of elk and low hunting pressure.

Offline Big6bull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 529
  • Location: Wet side
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2014, 08:31:26 AM »
I would rather not see either go general.  There is too few "quality" or "bull" hunts as it is on the West side.  Many of the units have already turned to an oil tag and these going general would make long shot tags turn to slim to no chance of drawing. I would rather see the entire state go permit only(severely limiting access permit sales) than more units go general. Winston could be lights out awesome (IMO) if the elk were given a break from the relentless pressure they get during hunting season.

I agree. And If they made those two units general season I would probly hunt out of state. Only two units I put in for.... 

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2014, 08:34:39 AM »
They need to make more units special permit not less. I would be all for a statewide draw for everything but predators.

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2014, 08:57:01 AM »
They also had the option of having part of unit and keeping the Margaret Backcountry special permit.

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2014, 08:58:12 AM »
Sorry part of unit general than other part in Margaret Backcountry permit.

Offline bradslam

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 517
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2014, 08:59:17 AM »
With what has been transpiring with pay for access by the timber companies, my attitude is who cares what they want?  To heck with them.  I've also had the Margaret tag and there is not enough decent permit hunts on the Westside as it is.

Offline sneakyjake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 468
  • Location: Lakewood, WA
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2014, 09:03:13 AM »
If those go general, what are the odds they will turn some of the surrounding units into permits?  That would pretty much $&@& up my hunt if they permitted my unit.  If it did go general, wouldn't the private owners be able to sell high dollar elk hunts in areas that were formally accessed by tax paying Washington residents?
« Last Edit: August 25, 2014, 09:16:21 AM by sneakyjake »

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2014, 09:10:08 AM »
We need more permit only units, not less, like others have said. (In my opinion)

I don't like the idea of giving Weyerhaeuser all control over wildlife management in SW Washington.

Let's make Ryderwood, Winston, Fall River, Lincoln, Minot Peak, and Coweeman permit only as well.

Offline bullcanyon

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 1293
  • Location: Lewiscounty
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2014, 09:29:35 AM »
Keep it permit only.  Not enough permit options as it is.  Wdfw will lose money on permit sales.  If they agree to this then weyeco is lining their pockets.

Offline Meat Truck

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 35
  • Location: The deep dark woods
  • If It's brown, It's down
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2014, 11:21:41 AM »
I think leaving it alone is best.  I'd hate to see it go general and have it be like the Winston, with five million people there.  As it is, it's a rare opportunity to get after them on the west side without a hunter every 100 yds.  I know the elk aren't what they used to be, but whatever.  I have the bull tag this year, and can't wait to have that many elk, with so few people hunting them.  I'd be very happy with a 5 point w/ my bow.

Offline TMortensen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 119
  • Location: Brush Prairie, WA
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2014, 05:25:22 PM »
I think the best option would be to make the private lands part of Margret into the toutle and then combine the upper smith creek, Margret back country and mt whittier into one Quality unit.  :twocents:

Offline huntingfool7

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1722
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
  • Groups: huntingfool7
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2014, 05:33:30 PM »
We need more permit only units, not less, like others have said. (In my opinion)

I don't like the idea of giving Weyerhaeuser all control over wildlife management in SW Washington.

Let's make Ryderwood, Winston, Fall River, Lincoln, Minot Peak, and Coweeman permit only as well.
  :yeah:  I commented - status quo but wouldn't be opposed to making all fee access areas permit only.  Let the Big W, Hancock and Rayonier wrap their special access permits around a WDFW tag drawing. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Today at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 01:52:01 PM]


2025 Montana alternate list by Sakko300wsm
[Today at 01:27:16 PM]


Blue Mtn Foothills West Rifle Tag by Trooper
[Today at 01:18:40 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Today at 01:01:22 PM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by bearpaw
[Today at 12:02:58 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by jrebel
[Today at 11:20:33 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Today at 11:12:46 AM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 11:07:43 AM]


Modified game cart... 🛒 by Dan-o
[Today at 08:44:37 AM]


Velvet by Brute
[Today at 08:37:08 AM]


Calling Bears by hunter399
[Today at 06:12:44 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 05:43:11 AM]


Lizard Cam by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 04:48:54 AM]


Pocket Carry by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:33:35 PM]


2025 Coyotes by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:15:03 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 06:11:55 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 02:14:23 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal