collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit  (Read 13329 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« on: August 25, 2014, 07:31:13 AM »
Game Dept survey asks whether Margaret should go general season.  Says landowners (aka Weyerhaeuser) want this...  Sounds like Big W wants to sell more access permits for more cash. 

Here's the link.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/regulations/seasonsetting/2015-2017/comments.php

Offline Hunter Dug

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 548
  • Location: Washougal
  • Owner: S&D Skull Works
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2014, 07:37:31 AM »
I think both Toutle and Margret should go general.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2014, 08:02:52 AM »
I would rather not see either go general.  There is too few "quality" or "bull" hunts as it is on the West side.  Many of the units have already turned to an oil tag and these going general would make long shot tags turn to slim to no chance of drawing. I would rather see the entire state go permit only(severely limiting access permit sales) than more units go general. Winston could be lights out awesome (IMO) if the elk were given a break from the relentless pressure they get during hunting season.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #3 on: August 25, 2014, 08:06:30 AM »
Of course weyco wants it general. Why would we want it to go general? We only have a handful of special permits we can put in for on the west side especially for archery and especially in the bull category. Having drawn the tag before I really enjoy having the opportunity to hunt an area with a high concentration of elk and low hunting pressure.

Offline Big6bull

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 531
  • Location: Wet side
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2014, 08:31:26 AM »
I would rather not see either go general.  There is too few "quality" or "bull" hunts as it is on the West side.  Many of the units have already turned to an oil tag and these going general would make long shot tags turn to slim to no chance of drawing. I would rather see the entire state go permit only(severely limiting access permit sales) than more units go general. Winston could be lights out awesome (IMO) if the elk were given a break from the relentless pressure they get during hunting season.

I agree. And If they made those two units general season I would probly hunt out of state. Only two units I put in for.... 

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2014, 08:34:39 AM »
They need to make more units special permit not less. I would be all for a statewide draw for everything but predators.

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2014, 08:57:01 AM »
They also had the option of having part of unit and keeping the Margaret Backcountry special permit.

Offline bowhunterty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 530
  • Location: Eastside
  • Hunt Hard or Stay Home!!!
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2014, 08:58:12 AM »
Sorry part of unit general than other part in Margaret Backcountry permit.

Offline bradslam

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 518
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2014, 08:59:17 AM »
With what has been transpiring with pay for access by the timber companies, my attitude is who cares what they want?  To heck with them.  I've also had the Margaret tag and there is not enough decent permit hunts on the Westside as it is.

Offline sneakyjake

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 468
  • Location: Lakewood, WA
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2014, 09:03:13 AM »
If those go general, what are the odds they will turn some of the surrounding units into permits?  That would pretty much $&@& up my hunt if they permitted my unit.  If it did go general, wouldn't the private owners be able to sell high dollar elk hunts in areas that were formally accessed by tax paying Washington residents?
« Last Edit: August 25, 2014, 09:16:21 AM by sneakyjake »

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39214
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2014, 09:10:08 AM »
We need more permit only units, not less, like others have said. (In my opinion)

I don't like the idea of giving Weyerhaeuser all control over wildlife management in SW Washington.

Let's make Ryderwood, Winston, Fall River, Lincoln, Minot Peak, and Coweeman permit only as well.

Offline bullcanyon

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 1293
  • Location: Lewiscounty
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #11 on: August 25, 2014, 09:29:35 AM »
Keep it permit only.  Not enough permit options as it is.  Wdfw will lose money on permit sales.  If they agree to this then weyeco is lining their pockets.

Offline Meat Truck

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 35
  • Location: The deep dark woods
  • If It's brown, It's down
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #12 on: August 25, 2014, 11:21:41 AM »
I think leaving it alone is best.  I'd hate to see it go general and have it be like the Winston, with five million people there.  As it is, it's a rare opportunity to get after them on the west side without a hunter every 100 yds.  I know the elk aren't what they used to be, but whatever.  I have the bull tag this year, and can't wait to have that many elk, with so few people hunting them.  I'd be very happy with a 5 point w/ my bow.

Offline TMortensen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2013
  • Posts: 119
  • Location: Brush Prairie, WA
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #13 on: August 25, 2014, 05:25:22 PM »
I think the best option would be to make the private lands part of Margret into the toutle and then combine the upper smith creek, Margret back country and mt whittier into one Quality unit.  :twocents:

Offline huntingfool7

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 1723
  • Location: Puyallup, WA
  • Groups: huntingfool7
Re: Margaret--should it go general or stay permit
« Reply #14 on: August 25, 2014, 05:33:30 PM »
We need more permit only units, not less, like others have said. (In my opinion)

I don't like the idea of giving Weyerhaeuser all control over wildlife management in SW Washington.

Let's make Ryderwood, Winston, Fall River, Lincoln, Minot Peak, and Coweeman permit only as well.
  :yeah:  I commented - status quo but wouldn't be opposed to making all fee access areas permit only.  Let the Big W, Hancock and Rayonier wrap their special access permits around a WDFW tag drawing. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt by JBar
[Today at 04:39:39 AM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 09:48:27 PM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 09:36:40 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Yesterday at 09:36:18 PM]


Pack wheel by millerwheeler
[Yesterday at 09:26:47 PM]


E WA waterfowl guide by 92xj
[Yesterday at 09:13:44 PM]


Where do the bulls go? by TeacherMan
[Yesterday at 09:04:39 PM]


Anyone use game carts? by bigdub257
[Yesterday at 08:55:58 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:55:31 PM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by kramman
[Yesterday at 08:51:05 PM]


Mushroom ID Thread by MLHSN
[Yesterday at 08:50:05 PM]


No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:22:23 PM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by ganghis
[Yesterday at 07:11:45 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by swanderek
[Yesterday at 07:01:53 PM]


West side antler buyers by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 06:18:29 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 03:45:16 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Gonehuntin01
[Yesterday at 03:23:04 PM]


My new BB Gun by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 02:41:00 PM]


Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 02:11:14 PM]


Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case by Tbar
[Yesterday at 01:43:14 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal