Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: wolfbait on September 05, 2014, 09:27:47 AMQuote from: Woodchuck on September 05, 2014, 07:25:27 AMThe down side of this is that the state's "management plan" is based on so many "breeding pairs" in each region. Sadly this seems like a big step backward from the goal of actual wolf management. "He added the alpha wolf weighed 66 pounds and was 3 years old."Seems a little small to be a three year old. WDFW and their friends are going to make sure that everything they do will hurt wolf delisting on paper. At 66 pounds it sounds to me like they shot a pup, but this news should bring some more wolf money in for CN, DoW etc. from their wolf wailing friends. I bet they have whip themselves into a good frenzy by now. I wonder how long WDFW will drag this out?A pup or a malnourished animal.
Quote from: Woodchuck on September 05, 2014, 07:25:27 AMThe down side of this is that the state's "management plan" is based on so many "breeding pairs" in each region. Sadly this seems like a big step backward from the goal of actual wolf management. "He added the alpha wolf weighed 66 pounds and was 3 years old."Seems a little small to be a three year old. WDFW and their friends are going to make sure that everything they do will hurt wolf delisting on paper. At 66 pounds it sounds to me like they shot a pup, but this news should bring some more wolf money in for CN, DoW etc. from their wolf wailing friends. I bet they have whip themselves into a good frenzy by now. I wonder how long WDFW will drag this out?
The down side of this is that the state's "management plan" is based on so many "breeding pairs" in each region. Sadly this seems like a big step backward from the goal of actual wolf management.
The alpha will choose a new one. There will be no lag in that paks growth
Quote from: AspenBud on September 05, 2014, 09:36:57 AMQuote from: wolfbait on September 05, 2014, 09:27:47 AMQuote from: Woodchuck on September 05, 2014, 07:25:27 AMThe down side of this is that the state's "management plan" is based on so many "breeding pairs" in each region. Sadly this seems like a big step backward from the goal of actual wolf management. "He added the alpha wolf weighed 66 pounds and was 3 years old."Seems a little small to be a three year old. WDFW and their friends are going to make sure that everything they do will hurt wolf delisting on paper. At 66 pounds it sounds to me like they shot a pup, but this news should bring some more wolf money in for CN, DoW etc. from their wolf wailing friends. I bet they have whip themselves into a good frenzy by now. I wonder how long WDFW will drag this out?A pup or a malnourished animal.We know they been eating a few sheep and killing a bunch just for fun, so that kind of leaves out the hungry end of things.
Quote from: wolfbait on September 05, 2014, 09:46:10 AMQuote from: AspenBud on September 05, 2014, 09:36:57 AMQuote from: wolfbait on September 05, 2014, 09:27:47 AMQuote from: Woodchuck on September 05, 2014, 07:25:27 AMThe down side of this is that the state's "management plan" is based on so many "breeding pairs" in each region. Sadly this seems like a big step backward from the goal of actual wolf management. "He added the alpha wolf weighed 66 pounds and was 3 years old."Seems a little small to be a three year old. WDFW and their friends are going to make sure that everything they do will hurt wolf delisting on paper. At 66 pounds it sounds to me like they shot a pup, but this news should bring some more wolf money in for CN, DoW etc. from their wolf wailing friends. I bet they have whip themselves into a good frenzy by now. I wonder how long WDFW will drag this out?A pup or a malnourished animal.We know they been eating a few sheep and killing a bunch just for fun, so that kind of leaves out the hungry end of things.True, but lack of food and smaller size may have been in part what drove them to the sheep. Sheep are easier to kill than elk or even deer. If I were a hungry wolf I know what I'd go for, the prey that takes less energy to kill.
Ooooops.Did you read through the comments on the KING5 website? Is it just my imagination, or were the vast majority of the commenters:1. Angry with WDFW's decision,2. Suspicious that WDFW is involved in a conspiracy to eliminate wolves (boy, the commenters don't spend much time on HuntWa, do they...),3. Female,4. Employed at universities.Please correct me if I have a mistaken impression.
Quote from: Woodchuck on September 05, 2014, 07:25:27 AMThe down side of this is that the state's "management plan" is based on so many "breeding pairs" in each region. Sadly this seems like a big step backward from the goal of actual wolf management. I couldn't care less if they never reach the "goal"!!! This is a step in the right direction if you ask me!
If they where starving i dout they would have been killing for fun. Takes too much energy to kill if they aren't going to eat it.