Free: Contests & Raffles.
It's just amazing how selfish and unsympathetic people are that have "no skin in the game". By the way, I do have livestock "skin in the game" and am a Wildlife Biologist.
Letter to Nate and the Commission, copied reps and senator:"Dear Mr. Pamplin and Members of the Wildlife Commission,As you most likely know, I'm a Master Hunter, a member of several conservation groups, and a member of an active member online forum which has in excess of 16,000 members. I'd like to know a few things about the recent transfer of a captured problem female wild wolf to Wolf Haven. 1. Was or will this wolf be spayed to avoid breeding with other species or hybrids? 2. Was DNA profiling done on this wolf for use in possible future examinations or investigations? 3. Is there a program set up to monitor the life of this wolf at the facility to ensure it doesn't accidentally escape and become a problem in another part of the state?There are many people who don't understand this transfer. The appearance of a relationship between the WDFW and and activist pro-wolf organization is definitely raising some eyebrows in the hunting and farming/ranching communities. In addition, as far as I can tell, no such transfer is outlined in the Wolf Plan and questions are being raised as to whether this transfer was 4. Even allowed under the program, 5. the decision of one person, or that of a group of people, and 6. who that person or people are. I'd like to get answers to all of these questions in a timely manner please. Feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your consideration of my request."
After speaking with someone very involved with the wolf program, he indicated the the WDFW is doing what they can to manage the wolves in the face of fierce opposition from the pro-wolf groups. He did say that if there were able they'd be managing the wolves more aggressively. They're being hampered in this by overwhelming public opinion in favor of the wolves and the possibility of pressure from the Governor's office is also a factor. It was also apparent from talking with him that when they were formulating the plan, they had no idea what they were getting into with regards to the scope and goals of the program, much as we've discussed and speculated on this forum. He urged me to keep from getting personal toward any one member of the WDFW as no one person is responsible for how they're being managed at this point. The information was helpful in getting an overall idea of where the program stands right now. I feel even stringer that the only hope we have to being able to manage the wolves within a reasonable period of time is if westsiders get a taste of the packs.
QuoteAfter speaking with someone very involved with the wolf program, he indicated the the WDFW is doing what they can to manage the wolves in the face of fierce opposition from the pro-wolf groups. He did say that if there were able they'd be managing the wolves more aggressively. They're being hampered in this by overwhelming public opinion in favor of the wolves and the possibility of pressure from the Governor's office is also a factor. It was also apparent from talking with him that when they were formulating the plan, they had no idea what they were getting into with regards to the scope and goals of the program, much as we've discussed and speculated on this forum. He urged me to keep from getting personal toward any one member of the WDFW as no one person is responsible for how they're being managed at this point. The information was helpful in getting an overall idea of where the program stands right now. I feel even stringer that the only hope we have to being able to manage the wolves within a reasonable period of time is if westsiders get a taste of the packs.Interestingly enough this is pretty much what Idahohuntr has been saying all along. I do quite agree with you that we are going to only see results when wolves start plaguing the west-siders. I can only hope that day comes quickly (even though I have mixed feelings about it happening).
Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife.
Quote from: headshot5 on October 09, 2014, 06:24:46 AMQuoteAfter speaking with someone very involved with the wolf program, he indicated the the WDFW is doing what they can to manage the wolves in the face of fierce opposition from the pro-wolf groups. He did say that if there were able they'd be managing the wolves more aggressively. They're being hampered in this by overwhelming public opinion in favor of the wolves and the possibility of pressure from the Governor's office is also a factor. It was also apparent from talking with him that when they were formulating the plan, they had no idea what they were getting into with regards to the scope and goals of the program, much as we've discussed and speculated on this forum. He urged me to keep from getting personal toward any one member of the WDFW as no one person is responsible for how they're being managed at this point. The information was helpful in getting an overall idea of where the program stands right now. I feel even stringer that the only hope we have to being able to manage the wolves within a reasonable period of time is if westsiders get a taste of the packs.Interestingly enough this is pretty much what Idahohuntr has been saying all along. I do quite agree with you that we are going to only see results when wolves start plaguing the west-siders. I can only hope that day comes quickly (even though I have mixed feelings about it happening). Not so much. He's not been saying they designed a plan way over their heads and are paying for their own mistakes. He's been one of their staunchest supporters in this plan. They screwed the pooch on this and the ranchers have to pay for it.
Quote from: PA BEN on October 09, 2014, 06:33:47 AM Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife. Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County.
Quote from: AspenBud on October 09, 2014, 06:52:22 AMQuote from: PA BEN on October 09, 2014, 06:33:47 AM Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife. Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County. You are totally wrong on who owns the lands in this entire country. We, the people do. We are the gubmint ( loosely because of how we're threatened by the corruption in the gubmint ). The gubmint is working for us, not the other way around. We pay their salaries, every cent of it. We need our power back and not the gubmint getting more and more and screwing us, period.
Quote from: CAMPMEAT on October 09, 2014, 07:10:05 AMQuote from: AspenBud on October 09, 2014, 06:52:22 AMQuote from: PA BEN on October 09, 2014, 06:33:47 AM Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife. Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County. You are totally wrong on who owns the lands in this entire country. We, the people do. We are the gubmint ( loosely because of how we're threatened by the corruption in the gubmint ). The gubmint is working for us, not the other way around. We pay their salaries, every cent of it. We need our power back and not the gubmint getting more and more and screwing us, period.You're absolutely right, it's we the people. Not just the people of Stevens County.
Quote from: CAMPMEAT on October 09, 2014, 07:10:05 AMQuote from: AspenBud on October 09, 2014, 06:52:22 AMQuote from: PA BEN on October 09, 2014, 06:33:47 AM Senator Brian Dansel spoke at the end of the meeting and chewed WDFW's a??. He said he is going to introduce legislation to move game management to the County and not the State. He got a standing O for that one. He said it will bring more money to the Counties and will benefit the wildlife. Unfortunately for the good senator state land belongs to the state and federal land belongs to the Fed. Or put another way, those lands belong to a heck of a lot more people than Stevens County. You are totally wrong on who owns the lands in this entire country. We, the people do. We are the gubmint ( loosely because of how we're threatened by the corruption in the gubmint ). The gubmint is working for us, not the other way around. We pay their salaries, every cent of it. We need our power back and not the gubmint getting more and more and screwing us, period.You're absolutely right, it's we the people. Not just the people of Stevens County. Every deer, elk, cougar, wolf, tree, spot of dirt... if it's on government land it belongs to everyone, not just one small population center in the corner of the state. That doesn't make what is happening particularly fair, but the fact remains, the county can enforce rules on county land and that's about it. The good senator just did what any politician does and say what his constituents wanted to hear and make promises that he can't keep or that are unachievable.