collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Accubond performance?  (Read 13529 times)

Offline Damnimissed

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 621
  • Location: Salmon, ID
Accubond performance?
« on: October 30, 2014, 09:28:30 PM »
I haven't used accubonds until this year, when I started handloading. I'm loading 140gr accubonds over 57gr of imr7828 in my 270win. It should be in the neighborhood of 2950fps.
The other day I took a hard quartering shot on a blacktail, which entered through 3 of the back ribs center punched the heart and exited out the brisket with pretty much no bloodshot. Now, I'm used to 300wm performance with core-lokts. A heart shot with that combo is devastating. So I'm wondering if this kind of performance is typical. The penetration was impressive but does expansion look ok?

Offline actionshooter

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 6022
  • Location: Olympia/Okanogan
    • https://www.instagram.com/steve.bell.actionshooter/
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2014, 09:39:49 PM »
Looks like it died............ :)

I have had great luck with accubonds all the way around, penetration and retention.

Offline Griiz

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 664
  • Location: Puget Sound
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2014, 09:40:22 PM »
Looks good to me. That bullet is made to hold together and penetrate and not blow up like a corlok.  You will put animals down, get exit holes, and not ruin as much meat. I personaly like knowing I will get good penetration.

Offline Hunting7mm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 425
  • Location: Forks,Wa.
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2014, 09:42:51 PM »
I shoot 160gr. Accubonds out of my 7mm mag. I matched my bullet speed 2850 to my Leupold BC reticle.  I've been shooting accubonds for years and have taken numerous animals.  My problem is the amount of damage Accubonds do.  This years blacktail had a hole the size of my fist exiting. 
Love God and try to be good!!! Phil Robertson

Offline Damnimissed

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 621
  • Location: Salmon, ID
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #4 on: October 30, 2014, 09:45:16 PM »
yeah, I'm aware of how tough they are. It just got me wondering if had I not hit his heart, would it have been a long tracking job. I really like the lack of bloodshot :IBCOOL:

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2014, 09:48:36 PM »
Hahaha! It's dead!

Their supposed to do "Damage".

Accubonds are pretty much all I shoot. But I still have soft spot for the  Hornady Interlock's and depending on the cartridge still slum them and animals die just the same.

Here's a few we have recovered.

260gr Accubond, recovered from a Mulie I shot at 560 yards with a .375 Ultra Magnum.







150gr Accubond I recovered from just under the hide on the off side of a mulie I shot in the 380yard range or so with a .300 WSM.










Those two bucks are almost identical, accept the point sides are reversed. Both shot within 300 yards of each other 3 years apart.






« Last Edit: October 30, 2014, 10:06:24 PM by Biggerhammer »

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11326
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2014, 09:49:15 PM »
I would have expected more damage.  My muzzleloader did more damage to a bucks heart with significantly less velocity.   With that said I think if you hit vitals it will kill it with the expansion seen there.   

Offline BOWHUNTER45

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 14731
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #7 on: October 30, 2014, 09:58:45 PM »
I shoot 160gr. Accubonds out of my 7mm mag. I matched my bullet speed 2850 to my Leupold BC reticle.  I've been shooting accubonds for years and have taken numerous animals.  My problem is the amount of damage Accubonds do.  This years blacktail had a hole the size of my fist exiting.
I loaded some for a friend and he just killed a dandy blacktail and the exit hole was about the size of a quarter .. very little meat wasted and dropped on the spot ...1st time I ever messed with them ...he now loves them  :chuckle:

Offline Biggerhammer

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 5142
  • Location: Central Washington
  • Powder, primer, bullet JUNKIE.
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #8 on: October 30, 2014, 10:12:12 PM »
I feel they perform almost identical to the Nosler Partition but have a higher BC and the polymere tip. I really like the Nolser Partition.

Offline sirmissalot

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3070
  • Location: Shelton, WA
    • chadpburgess@faceboo​k.com
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2014, 06:29:37 AM »
Looks perfect to me

Offline RadSav

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 11342
  • Location: Vancouver
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #10 on: October 31, 2014, 06:35:07 AM »
How far was the shot?  Hard to tell what the damage should look like until you know what the impact velocity was.  What did the lungs look like?
He asked, Do you ever give a short simple answer?  I replied, "Nope."

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2961
  • Location: FL350
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #11 on: October 31, 2014, 06:44:17 AM »
I've had great performance with them. Only recovered two out of ten(ish). Had a blacktail a bit over 200 yards, quartering away downhill. Broke three ribs on impact, took out a third of his heart, one of his lungs, broke the off shoulder, and gone. Another was a quartering away BT at 100 yards. Broke seven ribs before crossing the body and two more on the off side before coming to rest under the hide.

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3881
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #12 on: October 31, 2014, 06:54:18 AM »
  I have recently changed to accubonds and have killed deer, elk and moose so far with them. I have yet to try em on a bear, and am a little concerned due to the pinhole in affect and minimal blood trail. I typically hunt bear on the westside in the thick stuff so a blood trail is vital in recoverey.
Go hawks

Offline starbailey

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 751
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #13 on: October 31, 2014, 06:54:38 AM »
I've had nothing but good results with Accubonds and have been shooting them for years. 180s in a 300 ultra, 160s in 7mag, 140s in 270 win. I've killed more with the 7mm combo with the latest being a moose at 220 yards. First shot took out the front shoulder and was found next to hide on far side. Bullet performance looked perfect.
 All around great bullet.

Offline Damnimissed

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 621
  • Location: Salmon, ID
Re: Accubond performance?
« Reply #14 on: October 31, 2014, 07:07:09 AM »
How far was the shot?  Hard to tell what the damage should look like until you know what the impact velocity was.  What did the lungs look like?
I knew I forgot some critical info lol
It was about an 80yd shot. It clipped a lung, as well.
I guess I'm just used to scooping out liquified internals and this is the first non magnum I've used on game (I'm not a kid anymore) so I was just a little surprised at the results.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Steens Youth Buck tag by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 04:00:45 PM]


Knotty duck decoys by Gooseassassin
[Today at 03:57:22 PM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by rosscrazyelk
[Today at 03:53:50 PM]


Pack mules/llamas by Shooter4
[Today at 03:48:40 PM]


Grayback Youth Hunt by Deer slayer
[Today at 03:30:57 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by sjhgraysage
[Today at 03:20:01 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by greenhead_killer
[Today at 03:18:24 PM]


Public Land Sale Senate Budget Reconciliation by MR5x5
[Today at 03:17:31 PM]


gmu 636 elk hunt by eastfork
[Today at 02:01:27 PM]


Little Natchez cow elk by CarbonHunter
[Today at 11:00:47 AM]


2025 OILS! by Cspahman99
[Today at 09:41:04 AM]


Canvas Tent Repair Near Olympia?? by wildfire
[Today at 08:57:20 AM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by Airohunter
[Today at 07:53:44 AM]


Who’s walleye fishing? by Fatherof5
[Today at 07:42:47 AM]


Petition to ban fur sales in CO by Humptulips
[Today at 07:42:35 AM]


Antlerless Moose more than once? by hunter399
[Today at 06:10:05 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Eturner32
[Yesterday at 10:26:59 PM]


MA-10 Coho by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 10:17:05 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by waoutdoorsman
[Yesterday at 06:50:32 PM]


Arizona 2025 Elk and Antelope draw results are out by NWWA Hunter
[Yesterday at 06:31:05 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal