collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000  (Read 5270 times)

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38437
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
http://www.azjournal.com/2014/10/29/new-mexico-investigator-offers-stern-wolf-warning-to-arizona/
 
New Mexico Investigator Offers Stern Wolf Warning To Arizona

Oct 29, 2014
By Tammy Gray

Wolves are the main killers of cattle in Catron County, N.M., and are setting a record for the number of confirmed kills in 2014.

Catron County, which borders eastern Arizona and is included in the Gila National Forest, is the site of the Blue Range Wolf Recovery Area. It was one of the first areas where Mexican gray wolves were released in an effort to reestablish their population in western states.

According to Catron County Wildlife Investigator Jess Carey, the results have been devastating to local ranchers. In a report titled Mexican Wolf Recovery Collateral Damage Identification in Catron County alone, he noted that of five ranches he studied, two went out of business and a third did not restock cattle after 2009. Over the course of the study, the five ranches lost a total of 651 head of cattle valued at more than $382,000.

“The negative effects to livestock producers caused by Mexican Wolves are a wide spectrum not addressed and/or ignored by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Prior negative data and documentation of wolf recovery from other states were not utilized to mitigate the same negative effects of Mexican wolf recovery in New Mexico and Arizona,” he noted.

Carey also pointed out that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service does not take into account other types of damage to cattle operations, such as stress deaths caused by wolves running cattle, or loss of production by cows due to stress created by the presence of wolves. He noted that the department “demands that ranchers change their entire husbandry scheme to accommodate the presence of wolves; if the rancher refuses, no compensation is paid on wildlife services findings on confirmed or probable livestock depredations.”

In addition, payment of claims is running years behind schedule and a pro-wolf non-governmental organization is in charge of processing the claims, according to Carey.

He notes that he believes that the harm caused to ranchers is not only the result of the federal wildlife service and pro-wolf organizations, but also to a lack of coverage in the media.

“The truth about the negative impacts to rural folks by Mexican wolves is never provided to the citizens of Arizona and New Mexico because of the failure of the press. The collateral damage to achieve Mexican wolf recovery has destroyed many family ranchers,” he wrote.

According to Carey’s report, wolves quickly become acclimatized to humans and after a time do not flee even when warning shots are fired in the air. In Catron County, domestic animals besides cattle have been killed and injured, including horses, dogs, chickens and cats. The report notes that in one instance, a wolf bit the head off of a kitten in front of a group of children, and many attacks on domestic dogs occurred in the owner’s front or back yard.

Wildlife investigation reports from Catron County reveal that between Jan. 1, 2006, and Aug. 30, 2014, a total of 143 cattle were confirmed to have been killed by wolves. That total does not include deaths deemed as “probable” due to wolf depredation, or any other animals killed by wolves. During that same period, a total of 29 cattle were confirmed killed by coyotes, bears and mountain lion combined.

The wildlife investigation report notes that, “U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service John Oakleaf’s study of confirmed wolf killed livestock found: for every wolf killed livestock ‘confirmed’ there are 7 more that are not confirmed. Example: one ranch in 2009 had 10 confirmed wolf killed yearlings and have another 80 head missing. This is consistent with Oakleaf’s study.”

As of Aug. 30, wildlife investigations conducted in 2014 included 28 confirmed cases of cattle killed by wolves and one horse injured by a wolf. During the same period, there was one confirmed kill by a coyote and one by a bear, while five cattle died of unknown causes. In addition, there was one confirmed cattle injury by a wolf and six deaths ruled as likely caused by a wolf.

In the cases investigated in 2013, 14 cattle were confirmed to have been killed by wolves, while two were killed by coyotes and nine were listed as “unknown.” During that year, one dog and one puppy were confirmed to have been injured by wolves.

Investigations in 2012 included 13 cattle confirmed killed by wolves, one death listed as a “probable” wolf case and one confirmed cattle injury caused by wolves. One mule was killed by wolves, while three cattle were killed by bears, none by coyotes and in seven cases, the results were listed as unknown.

The 2011 investigative report shows that 25 cases of cattle killed by wolves were confirmed and two cases were listed as probable. A young horse was also confirmed killed by wolves. There were four cattle confirmed to have been injured by wolves, and 11 died of unknown causes. Three cattle were killed by bears and none by coyotes.

Of the cases investigated in 2010, five cattle were confirmed killed by wolves and two injured. There were also confirmed wolf kills of one colt and one elk. Six cattle deaths were of unknown cause, while one was killed by a bear and one by a domestic dog. In 2010, coyotes also killed a colt and some sheep.

During 2009, there were a total of 14 confirmed cases of wolves killing cattle and two “probable” cases. Wolves also killed a group of chickens and an elk that year. Six cattle died from unknown causes, while one was killed by a coyote and one by a mountain lion.

Cases investigated in 2008, include 13 cattle confirmed killed by wolves, three probable cases, and six injuries confirmed to have been caused by wolves. Wolves also killed a group of chickens. Bears killed three head of cattle that year, coyotes killed five and 14 deaths were due to unknown causes. In 2008 there were also three cattle killed by lightning and three in an accident.

Over the course of 2007, investigations revealed 20 confirmed wolf killings of cattle, 20 probable wolf killings of cattle and one confirmed cattle injury. Wolves also killed one horse and an elk, were listed as a probable cause in the killing of another horse and elk, were confirmed to have injured two dogs and were the probable cause of injury in a horse. Five cattle were killed by coyotes, two by bears and 10 by unknown causes. Coyotes also killed an emu that year.

In 2006, investigators confirmed that 11 cattle deaths were caused by wolves, and three were listed as probable cases. There was also one case of cattle injury by wolves and one probable injury due to wolves. That year, wolves were also confirmed to have killed one dog, one kitten and one cat, injured a dog, and were listed as the probable cause in the injury of three horses and a sheep. Also during 2006, four cattle were killed by motor vehicles, two by bears, one by a coyote and five by unknown causes. Two died during calving and one was due to natural causes.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2013 progress report on the Mexican Wolf reintroduction project notes that the 1996 environmental impact statement predicted that there would be between one and 34 confirmed cases of cattle killed by wolves in the Blue Range reintroduction area, based on a population of 100 wolves. According to the report, at that rate the total kills would be less than one half of one percent of all cattle in the area.

From 1998 to 2003, the total number of kills in the Blue Range area stayed below the projected amount, at an average of 13.8 cattle per 100 wolves. Between 2005 and 2009, that number increased and the report notes that, “the number of confirmed cattle killed by wolves exceeded the predicted rate.” In 2008, the average was 36.5 cattle per 100 wolves and in 2009 it was 50 cattle per 100 wolves. According to the report, the number dropped back down to within the predicted range between 2010 and 2012, with an average of 24 cattle killed per 100 wolves.

In 2005, the Arizona Game and Fish Department reported that a preliminary diet analysis of Mexican Wolves revealed that their diet is comprised of about 75 percent elk, 11 percent small animals and unknown sources, 10 percent deer and four percent livestock. At that time, there were a total of 70 confirmed or suspected cattle killed by wolves and ranchers had been reimbursed a total of $34,000.

The Arizona Game and Fish report notes that most observed predation is on young elk, however, wolves were also seeking out livestock.

“Although small in comparison to all available livestock present, depredation is measurable, and usually focused on one or two allotments,” the report states.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working on a plan to reintroduce wolves to nearly the entire state of Arizona, including all areas south of Interstate 40.

Carey noted that Arizona residents should take heed.

“The folks of Arizona do not realize what is coming to their community. Most impacted will be the rural families. They will have their family pets killed, livestock killed, and have to live with habituated wolves in yards, on front porches, and confronting children and adults alike at close range,” he wrote.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18045
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2014, 09:01:05 PM »
 :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash: :bash:

Totally unfair to screew those ranchers that way.
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline jasnt

  • ELR junkie
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Posts: 6539
  • Location: deer park
  • Out shooting
  • Groups: WSTA
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2014, 09:06:18 PM »
:puke:
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/take_action  It takes 10 seconds and it’s free. To easy to make an excuse not to make your voice heard!!!!!!

The commission shall attempt to maximize the public recreational game fishing and hunting opportunities of all citizens, including juvenile, disabled, and senior citizens.
https://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=77.04.012

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2014, 12:41:43 AM »
The usfws has to pay these claims? Or the state departments of game and fish?? Oh wait" departments of fish and wildlife" for you people in Warshington  :chuckle:

Online PA BEN

  • LINEMAN
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 4877
  • Location: Chewelah
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2014, 06:26:29 AM »
Welcome to Eastern Washington.  :bash: A guy at the Colville wolf meeting talked about a land grab by the government. The only way to do it is to bring in the wolves to run you off your land. I thought the guy was way out there, but after reading this :dunno:

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2014, 06:29:10 AM »
Welcome to Eastern Washington.  :bash: A guy at the Colville wolf meeting talked about a land grab by the government. The only way to do it is to bring in the wolves to run you off your land. I thought the guy was way out there, but after reading this :dunno:

Hurry! Don't miss out on the coming business opportunity!!!    :chuckle:

http://www.king5.com/story/news/local/2014/11/01/okanogan-pot-farmers/18326041/

Offline Bob Williams1

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 252
  • Location: Auburn, Wa.
  • Groups: Washington Predator Hunting Association
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2014, 10:48:29 AM »
Yeah that is really sad..I watched a youtube clip called "Yellowstone is dead" that takes a very tragic look at what the Wolves have been doing to the parks animals. Literally thousands of animals destroyed, herds of elk that numbered in the 15-20 thousand range know under 5 thousand and of that mostly mature animals because the repopulation plan for the elk is being terminated shortly after birth, so when the elders are finally killed off then what?

Its amusing to me that the wolf enthusiasts are usually the same people who would enjoy taking hikes into the wilderness and perhaps seeing an animal or two..Some deer in the meadow or elk on the distant ridge. The introduction of the wolf into those areas have and will continue to minimize the opportunity of you seeing anything in those woods unless it lives in a tree..

But the story with the ranchers- One guy on the video said it best...This isn't about the wolf, this is about the livelyhoods of (in this case) 5 ranchers who can no longer afford to keep replacing animals and building new regulations projects at their own expense around the property.

My agricultural crew would be rotated to cover the night shift and well equipt with thermal imaging devices atop an Larue .308 with as many 30 round banana clips as that thing can eat.. And ALL predators caught on the property, not on a leash will be dealt with as anything else that comes on the property with bad intentions.

Enough of this non-sense ...Lets see some case study that shows you anything positive about these reintroductions besides pack enlargements.   
Ranchers- being negatively effected
All big and small game species are being effected. National Parks losing all the animals customers pay to come see. As a result of lower animal numbers season's are changed, shortened or cancelled. I am not sure thats what the wolf lover wanted but that's what ya got and somebody needs to be liable for it.




 
It's never to late to be what you could have been

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2014, 10:59:56 AM »
Yeah that is really sad..I watched a youtube clip called "Yellowstone is dead" that takes a very tragic look at what the Wolves have been doing to the parks animals. Literally thousands of animals destroyed, herds of elk that numbered in the 15-20 thousand range know under 5 thousand and of that mostly mature animals because the repopulation plan for the elk is being terminated shortly after birth, so when the elders are finally killed off then what?

Its amusing to me that the wolf enthusiasts are usually the same people who would enjoy taking hikes into the wilderness and perhaps seeing an animal or two..Some deer in the meadow or elk on the distant ridge. The introduction of the wolf into those areas have and will continue to minimize the opportunity of you seeing anything in those woods unless it lives in a tree..

But the story with the ranchers- One guy on the video said it best...This isn't about the wolf, this is about the livelyhoods of (in this case) 5 ranchers who can no longer afford to keep replacing animals and building new regulations projects at their own expense around the property.

My agricultural crew would be rotated to cover the night shift and well equipt with thermal imaging devices atop an Larue .308 with as many 30 round banana clips as that thing can eat.. And ALL predators caught on the property, not on a leash will be dealt with as anything else that comes on the property with bad intentions.

Enough of this non-sense ...Lets see some case study that shows you anything positive about these reintroductions besides pack enlargements.   
Ranchers- being negatively effected
All big and small game species are being effected. National Parks losing all the animals customers pay to come see. As a result of lower animal numbers season's are changed, shortened or cancelled. I am not sure thats what the wolf lover wanted but that's what ya got and somebody needs to be liable for it.

The Yellowstone argument is the one that really cracks me up. That's what was supposed to happen, it was never a secret and even the not so wolf friendly people who agreed to their being released there knew it. It panned out exactly as the pro wolf folks wanted and predicted quite publicly.

I know someone who took a vacation down in Yellowstone last summer and they claim to have hiked quite bit off the beaten trail and all they talked about was seeing all manner of wildlife. As long as that is still possible nothing will change. The summer crowds come for the elk, they come for the deer, they come for the bears, and now they come to see the wolves. They want the total package, not just an elk farm. Right or wrong that's the reality.

Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2014, 11:52:22 AM »
Welcome to Eastern Washington.  :bash: A guy at the Colville wolf meeting talked about a land grab by the government. The only way to do it is to bring in the wolves to run you off your land. I thought the guy was way out there, but after reading this :dunno:

WA Farmers Block Federal Drones And Agenda 21
http://govtslaves.info/wa-farmers-block-federal-drones-and-agenda-21/


Agenda 21 for Public Officials http://my.brainshark.com/Agenda-21-for-Public-Officials-472185383

Offline predkiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2014
  • Posts: 23
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2014, 04:01:06 PM »
One of the major objectives of USFW and all environmental groups is to destroy private property rights.. make them unusable. What Ironic is NO where in the Constitution is there Rights for Animals Whether they Are "Endangered" or not. If Americans dont wake up you'll find you have NO property rights or any place to Hunt fish or even live, if the Serria clubs of the world get their way.

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 18746
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2014, 04:41:57 PM »
Welcome to Eastern Washington.  :bash: A guy at the Colville wolf meeting talked about a land grab by the government. The only way to do it is to bring in the wolves to run you off your land. I thought the guy was way out there, but after reading this :dunno:

WA Farmers Block Federal Drones And Agenda 21
http://govtslaves.info/wa-farmers-block-federal-drones-and-agenda-21/


Agenda 21 for Public Officials http://my.brainshark.com/Agenda-21-for-Public-Officials-472185383

They must be using the water levels of the Skagit river to control development in Skagit county for alignment of Agenda 21.  :bash:
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline Guy

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 682
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2014, 01:02:33 PM »
Pretty brutal conditions for the ranchers. Not surprising though.

Doggone wolves.

Guy

Offline bracer40

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 1433
Re: Wolves: Five ranches lost 651 cattle valued at more than $382,000
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2014, 01:57:31 PM »
Welcome to Eastern Washington.  :bash: A guy at the Colville wolf meeting talked about a land grab by the government. The only way to do it is to bring in the wolves to run you off your land. I thought the guy was way out there, but after reading this :dunno:

Hurry! Don't miss out on the coming business opportunity!!!    :chuckle:

http://www.king5.com/story/news/local/2014/11/01/okanogan-pot-farmers/18326041/

With a handle like AspenBud, you must be all over this one! :chuckle:
“Just give me a comfortable couch, a dog, a good book, and a woman. Then if you can get the dog to go somewhere and read the book, I might have a little fun.”
― Groucho Marx

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Colorado Results by vandeman17
[Today at 02:29:43 PM]


Resetting dash warning lights by HikerHunter
[Today at 01:49:31 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 01:29:15 PM]


Burrowing Animal by b0bbyg
[Today at 12:43:47 PM]


Cold bore or fouled barrel. by hunter399
[Today at 12:36:22 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by HntnFsh
[Today at 09:13:54 AM]


The time clock has started.....and go. by hunter399
[Today at 07:37:38 AM]


DIY Ucluelet trip by CP
[Today at 05:48:15 AM]


Oregon spring bear by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 08:03:28 PM]


Oregon Seed #'s by Doublelunger
[Yesterday at 07:35:15 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by hunter399
[Yesterday at 04:38:43 PM]


Black Eagle arrows deals by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 02:02:59 PM]


2025 Multiseason Deer General? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 12:23:10 PM]


Last year putting in… by Dirtnap
[Yesterday at 11:48:14 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal