collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now  (Read 11093 times)

Offline Jingles

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3868
  • Location: Methow Valley 98862
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #15 on: November 09, 2014, 06:03:56 PM »
I still see nothing wrong with a couple of closed mouth Volunteers assisting the wolves to migrate to an area where there is less predatory competition.... Canopied pickup with darkened windows over and back before it gets light in the AM
HMC/USN/RET
1969 -1990
The comments of this poster do not reflect the opinions of HUNTWA Administrators or Moderators unless they so state.

The duty of a Patriot is to protect his country from it's government

Offline bugs n bones

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 1091
  • Location: north bend
  • Groups: WSTA, NRA, SCI
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #16 on: November 09, 2014, 06:09:02 PM »
It doesn't matter if they bring them to the westside or not. The damage is beeing done as we speek. By the time we ever got to actually hunt and manage the wolves , which I'd bet won't ever happen in this liberal state its gonna be too late for are deer and elk. Hate to say that but they were killed off for a reason. Wolf hunting would be held up in court for washington till hell froze over. :twocents:

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #17 on: November 10, 2014, 09:05:35 AM »
we dont need any wolves, i feel bad for idaho and eastern wa, there is a GOOD REASON WE HUNTED THEM TO EXTINCTION....

This makes me sad.  We on the Eastside are slways forced to deal with Westside politics.  If they say it's good for Washingtonians than all of us should suffer from it.  Because us Eastsiders can't change or over power the Westside mentality.   Heck - we should just start trapping them and trucking them over to Olympic peninsula and tiger mountain to extradite the inevitable.  The sooner the get there the sooner things will change.

Let's make it a fair swap. Want some hoof rot for your elk "herds?"

Can not make that trade. We will need the hoof rot affected elk to feed the wolves. Everyone knows a pack of wolves can not...... make that "will not" eat the healthy of the herd only the young, old, lame, and weak, oh and any other ones they can catch. It is all about balance  :bash:.

Then it should work out great. Rather than just one corner of the state negatively affected we can really slit our wrists as hunters and have elk and deer in every corner wiped out. A true end to big game hunting...expedited.

Sounds like a brilliant plan.   :bash:

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #18 on: November 10, 2014, 09:06:33 AM »
we dont need any wolves, i feel bad for idaho and eastern wa, there is a GOOD REASON WE HUNTED THEM TO EXTINCTION....

This makes me sad.  We on the Eastside are slways forced to deal with Westside politics.  If they say it's good for Washingtonians than all of us should suffer from it.  Because us Eastsiders can't change or over power the Westside mentality.   Heck - we should just start trapping them and trucking them over to Olympic peninsula and tiger mountain to extradite the inevitable.  The sooner the get there the sooner things will change.

Let's make it a fair swap. Want some hoof rot for your elk "herds?"


Wow, wow, wow.  That is not a comparable arguement. Hoof rot is a natural condition.  Even better it would be surpressed by a healthy wolf population.  Don't get me wrong, I don't an uncontrolled wolf population anywhere!  But this issue won't get enough political pressure until it starts affecting the westside of the state where the majority of the voting population lives.

Not according to several people in the areas it is occurring.

Offline turkeyfeather

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Posts: 5128
  • Location: Stevens County
  • Groups: NWTF
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #19 on: November 10, 2014, 09:11:50 AM »
I wonder how many people actually believe that the USFWS and WDFW haven't already put wolves on the OP etc.?

"An Olympic Peninsula legislator, Rep. Kevin Van De Wege, D-Sequim, said he wasn’t opposed to wolves migrating onto the peninsula, but doesn’t want them relocated there."

"Migrating wolves"  :chuckle: :chuckle:
What's the difference if they migrate on their own or in the back of a truck. They are still migrating.  :chuckle:
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation. Your character is who you actually are while your reputation is merely who others think you are.

Offline Katmai Guy

  • Retired
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 1590
  • Location: Covington
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #20 on: November 10, 2014, 09:34:24 AM »
 What does this do for the possibility of de-listing?  If you don't get enough breeding pairs throughout the entire state, it's my understanding they can not be delisted, never hunted.
"Keep shootin, when there's lead in the air, there's hope"

Offline Sandberm

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 5357
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #21 on: November 10, 2014, 09:43:04 AM »
I wish I could remember where I saw it but...I just read something about introducing wolves to the Olympic peninsula as a way to control some animals population. There were 3 options as a means to control this species and one option was the introduction of wolves. Maybe it was a WDFW e-mail. ...sheep, goats....cant remember

Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #22 on: November 10, 2014, 10:20:37 AM »
I wish I could remember where I saw it but...I just read something about introducing wolves to the Olympic peninsula as a way to control some animals population. There were 3 options as a means to control this species and one option was the introduction of wolves. Maybe it was a WDFW e-mail. ...sheep, goats....cant remember

Probably mountain goats. Despite a hiker getting himself gored to death by one a few years back (btw, that means mountain goats have wolves beat for fatalities in the lower 48) the enviro's are fighting attempts to eliminate them.

Offline Sandberm

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2013
  • Posts: 5357
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #23 on: November 10, 2014, 10:26:58 AM »
I wish I could remember where I saw it but...I just read something about introducing wolves to the Olympic peninsula as a way to control some animals population. There were 3 options as a means to control this species and one option was the introduction of wolves. Maybe it was a WDFW e-mail. ...sheep, goats....cant remember

Probably mountain goats. Despite a hiker getting himself gored to death by one a few years back (btw, that means mountain goats have wolves beat for fatalities in the lower 48) the enviro's are fighting attempts to eliminate them.

Didnt the family win a large settlement from the state as a result of the hikers death from goat? Usually the state getting sued leads to policy change and freedoms being taken away from the rest of us.


Offline AspenBud

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1742
  • Location: Washington
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #24 on: November 10, 2014, 10:36:26 AM »
I wish I could remember where I saw it but...I just read something about introducing wolves to the Olympic peninsula as a way to control some animals population. There were 3 options as a means to control this species and one option was the introduction of wolves. Maybe it was a WDFW e-mail. ...sheep, goats....cant remember

Probably mountain goats. Despite a hiker getting himself gored to death by one a few years back (btw, that means mountain goats have wolves beat for fatalities in the lower 48) the enviro's are fighting attempts to eliminate them.

Didnt the family win a large settlement from the state as a result of the hikers death from goat? Usually the state getting sued leads to policy change and freedoms being taken away from the rest of us.

They did and the case was dismissed.

One of the crazier lawsuits I've seen in a while, mainly because I'm sorry, if you walk into the wild there are things that can hurt you. Come prepared and accept some personal responsibility.

Offline idahohuntr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 3601
Re: Once studied closely, moving wolves to Olympic Peninsula unlikely now
« Reply #25 on: November 10, 2014, 10:49:04 AM »
I wish I could remember where I saw it but...I just read something about introducing wolves to the Olympic peninsula as a way to control some animals population. There were 3 options as a means to control this species and one option was the introduction of wolves. Maybe it was a WDFW e-mail. ...sheep, goats....cant remember

Probably mountain goats. Despite a hiker getting himself gored to death by one a few years back (btw, that means mountain goats have wolves beat for fatalities in the lower 48) the enviro's are fighting attempts to eliminate them.

Didnt the family win a large settlement from the state as a result of the hikers death from goat? Usually the state getting sued leads to policy change and freedoms being taken away from the rest of us.

They did and the case was dismissed.

One of the crazier lawsuits I've seen in a while, mainly because I'm sorry, if you walk into the wild there are things that can hurt you. Come prepared and accept some personal responsibility.
:yeah:
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Colorado Results by vandeman17
[Today at 02:29:43 PM]


Resetting dash warning lights by HikerHunter
[Today at 01:49:31 PM]


What's flatbed pickup life like? by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 01:29:15 PM]


Burrowing Animal by b0bbyg
[Today at 12:43:47 PM]


Cold bore or fouled barrel. by hunter399
[Today at 12:36:22 PM]


Please Report Problems & Bugs Here by HntnFsh
[Today at 09:13:54 AM]


The time clock has started.....and go. by hunter399
[Today at 07:37:38 AM]


DIY Ucluelet trip by CP
[Today at 05:48:15 AM]


Oregon spring bear by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 08:03:28 PM]


Oregon Seed #'s by Doublelunger
[Yesterday at 07:35:15 PM]


WDFW falsely advertising preference points by hunter399
[Yesterday at 04:38:43 PM]


Black Eagle arrows deals by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 02:02:59 PM]


2025 Multiseason Deer General? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 12:23:10 PM]


Last year putting in… by Dirtnap
[Yesterday at 11:48:14 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal