Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TRIndeed, and somewhat ironic that you invoke Roosevelt's phrase in this manner amidst your criticism of the credentialed volunteer. Don't be too critical of the volunteer doing the work.The state's failure to cooperate with a reasonable request from Dr. Mora in a timely manner is suspicious. If their work is solid, his work would corroborate that. No skin off their nose, so why delay? Some form of political coercion or ethics issue would be in play for them not to cooperate. Therefore, any work they produce should be considered suspect, and their cohort potentially corrupted.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR
http://jcm.asm.org/content/early/2014/10/27/JCM.02276-14.abstractI think we've got the right mechanic
Quote from: idahohuntr on November 26, 2014, 08:00:57 AMhttp://jcm.asm.org/content/early/2014/10/27/JCM.02276-14.abstractI think we've got the right mechanic The live stock industry has been dealing with this for a long time and spent a lot of money trying to figure out. Peer reviewed science is what we should be learning from. Not conspiracy theories or self proclaimed experts who want to conduct studies that are not subject to peer review.
Oh...he's testing for chemicals now? I thought it was lepto? What will it be next week? Maybe he should read wdfw's research...he needs to catch up with the rest of the scientific community if he wants to help. Of course if he and others want to just use and exploit this serious issue for selfish interests...then I can see why he would rather just twist in the wind about possible causes. It would also explain why he hasn't done anything or produced a single shred of data or evidence of anything. Folks say "let him do the study"...we'll nobody is stopping him...what's the hold up? Why hasn't he already collected samples and solved this? While quick to criticize, he hasn't produced anything in several years but hot air. Meanwhile wdfw has isolated a specific bacteria associated only with the hoof deformities...a breakthrough that may lead to the best management options. Their research is reviewed by panels of independent experts and is on the best path to save elk herds.I know who I want working on this problem.
Quote from: idahohuntr on November 26, 2014, 08:43:30 PMOh...he's testing for chemicals now? I thought it was lepto? What will it be next week? Maybe he should read wdfw's research...he needs to catch up with the rest of the scientific community if he wants to help. Of course if he and others want to just use and exploit this serious issue for selfish interests...then I can see why he would rather just twist in the wind about possible causes. It would also explain why he hasn't done anything or produced a single shred of data or evidence of anything. Folks say "let him do the study"...we'll nobody is stopping him...what's the hold up? Why hasn't he already collected samples and solved this? While quick to criticize, he hasn't produced anything in several years but hot air. Meanwhile wdfw has isolated a specific bacteria associated only with the hoof deformities...a breakthrough that may lead to the best management options. Their research is reviewed by panels of independent experts and is on the best path to save elk herds.I know who I want working on this problem.
Quote from: dreamunelk on November 26, 2014, 08:08:07 AMQuote from: idahohuntr on November 26, 2014, 08:00:57 AMhttp://jcm.asm.org/content/early/2014/10/27/JCM.02276-14.abstractI think we've got the right mechanic The live stock industry has been dealing with this for a long time and spent a lot of money trying to figure out. Peer reviewed science is what we should be learning from. Not conspiracy theories or self proclaimed experts who want to conduct studies that are not subject to peer review.First of all, Dr. More is as far from a "self-proclaimed expert" as can be. He's recognized the world over as an expert in his field. Secondly, he's not asking for no peer review. He's asking to conduct studies which the WDFW has refused to conduct. Don't buy into the BS of the department cheerleader in here who thinks that the WDFW can do no wrong. They have consistently avoided doing any testing for agricultural chemicals in their toxicologies, admittedly. And, just because this looks like the same disease that affect domestic stock, doesn't mean it's so. The WDFW has known about this problem for over 20 years. The fact is that they have no conclusive evidence that this is the same disease as found affecting domestic livestock.