Free: Contests & Raffles.
The challenge is that the elk must be freshly killed (within a couple hours) so assisting with sample collection will take some coordination. Dr. Mora told me that he would be willing to trail hunters in his own vehicle or be on-call to meet those hunting in the Willapa area.
Lots of January cow permits. Plus archery season from Nov 26 - Dec 15.
So, if someone were doing research relying on legally harvested elk...wouldn't it make a whole lot of sense to identify when seasons are open so as to maximize one's opportunity to collect samples? Typically, research is carefully planned and implemented in ways that minimize oversight like this. While this is perhaps a simple mistake it does not give me much faith that Dr. Mora possesses the knowledge and abilities to address this serious issue. I think we can all applaud Dr. Mora for having a desire to help elk...but this little mistake is just one prime example of why we should leave wildlife research to the professionals. The only thing worse than no information is bad information.
Dr. Mora just purchased $300 worth of media which he would like to utilize by obtaining biological samples of freshly killed elk, preferably those suffering from hoof disease.
I know the WDFW is planning on culling some limping elk here in the next few months. I'm guessing there are going to be some Master Hunters involved in the culling. It is quite possible some of these Master Hunters are involved on this site. It would be a very opportune time for someone involved to collect samples. Just a thought for some of the Master Hunters out there.
What kind of media? And how do you utilize media in this manner? $300 doesn't sound like very much!
QuoteWhat kind of media? And how do you utilize media in this manner? $300 doesn't sound like very much!Media or culture medium is something designed to help grow and develop microorganisms, bacteria, cells, etc. so that a scientist can study them more closely.
Dr. Mora may not have a handle on our different elk seasons and units, as he's not a hunter himself.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on November 25, 2014, 06:59:00 AMDr. Mora may not have a handle on our different elk seasons and units, as he's not a hunter himself. Actually Dr. Mora told me he used to harvest a lot of deer back in North Carolina.
One expert has ruled it out. One thinks it's the problem. Have you some degree in the area of which we're unaware?
I'm going to be hunting in that area, but I'm not confident enough in my ability to find elk to have a biologist riding along. I would however be happen to plate samples from a harvest elk, if Dr. Mora shares his sampling protocol.This is not a difficult process for most types of selective media.
"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TR
Quote"It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood..." - TRIndeed, and somewhat ironic that you invoke Roosevelt's phrase in this manner amidst your criticism of the credentialed volunteer. Don't be too critical of the volunteer doing the work.The state's failure to cooperate with a reasonable request from Dr. Mora in a timely manner is suspicious. If their work is solid, his work would corroborate that. No skin off their nose, so why delay? Some form of political coercion or ethics issue would be in play for them not to cooperate. Therefore, any work they produce should be considered suspect, and their cohort potentially corrupted.
http://jcm.asm.org/content/early/2014/10/27/JCM.02276-14.abstractI think we've got the right mechanic
Quote from: idahohuntr on November 26, 2014, 08:00:57 AMhttp://jcm.asm.org/content/early/2014/10/27/JCM.02276-14.abstractI think we've got the right mechanic The live stock industry has been dealing with this for a long time and spent a lot of money trying to figure out. Peer reviewed science is what we should be learning from. Not conspiracy theories or self proclaimed experts who want to conduct studies that are not subject to peer review.
Oh...he's testing for chemicals now? I thought it was lepto? What will it be next week? Maybe he should read wdfw's research...he needs to catch up with the rest of the scientific community if he wants to help. Of course if he and others want to just use and exploit this serious issue for selfish interests...then I can see why he would rather just twist in the wind about possible causes. It would also explain why he hasn't done anything or produced a single shred of data or evidence of anything. Folks say "let him do the study"...we'll nobody is stopping him...what's the hold up? Why hasn't he already collected samples and solved this? While quick to criticize, he hasn't produced anything in several years but hot air. Meanwhile wdfw has isolated a specific bacteria associated only with the hoof deformities...a breakthrough that may lead to the best management options. Their research is reviewed by panels of independent experts and is on the best path to save elk herds.I know who I want working on this problem.
Quote from: idahohuntr on November 26, 2014, 08:43:30 PMOh...he's testing for chemicals now? I thought it was lepto? What will it be next week? Maybe he should read wdfw's research...he needs to catch up with the rest of the scientific community if he wants to help. Of course if he and others want to just use and exploit this serious issue for selfish interests...then I can see why he would rather just twist in the wind about possible causes. It would also explain why he hasn't done anything or produced a single shred of data or evidence of anything. Folks say "let him do the study"...we'll nobody is stopping him...what's the hold up? Why hasn't he already collected samples and solved this? While quick to criticize, he hasn't produced anything in several years but hot air. Meanwhile wdfw has isolated a specific bacteria associated only with the hoof deformities...a breakthrough that may lead to the best management options. Their research is reviewed by panels of independent experts and is on the best path to save elk herds.I know who I want working on this problem.
Quote from: dreamunelk on November 26, 2014, 08:08:07 AMQuote from: idahohuntr on November 26, 2014, 08:00:57 AMhttp://jcm.asm.org/content/early/2014/10/27/JCM.02276-14.abstractI think we've got the right mechanic The live stock industry has been dealing with this for a long time and spent a lot of money trying to figure out. Peer reviewed science is what we should be learning from. Not conspiracy theories or self proclaimed experts who want to conduct studies that are not subject to peer review.First of all, Dr. More is as far from a "self-proclaimed expert" as can be. He's recognized the world over as an expert in his field. Secondly, he's not asking for no peer review. He's asking to conduct studies which the WDFW has refused to conduct. Don't buy into the BS of the department cheerleader in here who thinks that the WDFW can do no wrong. They have consistently avoided doing any testing for agricultural chemicals in their toxicologies, admittedly. And, just because this looks like the same disease that affect domestic stock, doesn't mean it's so. The WDFW has known about this problem for over 20 years. The fact is that they have no conclusive evidence that this is the same disease as found affecting domestic livestock.