I think I'm a pretty reasonable person. I said it earlier. Convince me of the value of having a select group having access to seasons the general population does not. Lots of complaints about losing acces to timber land, seasons cut for one group to give to another. Why is this any different other than you chose to participate and feel you're entitled.
That is a separate discussion, but here goes:
* I have no problem with WDFW wanting to utilize a tool like the MH group.
* It's a legitimate way to organize volunteers.
* It's a legitimate tool for WDFW to use in damage control situations.
* Qualifying for the MH program includes marksmanship, volunteer work, and a knowledge test. Seems like as good a criteria as any.
* I can see the need for a method to qualify people for removing animals in restricted circumstances.
* I don't think for a moment that it's foolproof, or is necessarily the best way to qualify people, but..... I don't really know of a better way.
* The MH requirements are STRINGENTLY enforced. Screw up (any game offense) and you are out. Period. So, MH participants are helt to a higher standard, which is good IMO.
* IF you have a better suggestion, you can certainly submit it to WDFW for consideration.
I am curious: Do you just think that WDFW should not be allowed to use specific tools like the MH program, or?