collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: HB 1660 - Contact your rep!  (Read 3536 times)

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5534
HB 1660 - Contact your rep!
« on: February 06, 2015, 11:55:42 AM »
HB 1660 is a bipartisan bill aimed at reinvesting dollars WDFW receives from sport fishing back into sport fishing.  Here is a recent newspaper article that really hits the nail on the head.  I strongly encourage everyone to contact their legislators.  I have already contacted mine.

Here is the letter to the Editor in the Daily World:

Creating a world-class sport fishing industry in Washington
By Rep. Liz Pike, Bryan Irwin and Dave Patterson

The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) is funded by the state Legislature every two years to manage, among other things, our state’s fisheries. In the last budget cycle, DFW received nearly $376 million in federal, state and local funding. Nearly $71 million came from the sale of recreational fishing licenses and excise taxes on fishing tackle, or about 19 percent of DFW’s total budget. The smallest contribution – $1.5 million – or less than one-half of one percent of DFW’s budget came from commercial fishing interests.

In 1974, Federal Judge George Boldt upheld treaty fishing rights, in what is known as the “Boldt Decision,” allocating 50 percent of the annual catch to Native American treaty tribes. The remaining 50 percent of the harvest is split between recreational fishing enthusiasts and commercial fishermen using gill and seine nets.

State policies have given the advantage to non-tribal commercial gillnet fisheries on the lower Columbia River, allowing them to harvest two-and-a-half times more salmon than recreational fishers. The disparity is even worse in Willapa Bay as recreational fisheries are constrained, but non-tribal commercial gillnet fisheries are free to harvest 93 percent of available salmon, even though recreational fishers contribute vastly more income to our state’s economy and to DFW’s budget than commercial interests.

More troubling is the preferential treatment given to commercial fishing over recreational fishing in the form of priority seasons set by DFW. For decades, recreational anglers have been treated as a nuisance at DFW, while preferred timing and seasons have been reserved for commercial interests. This has limited recreational fishing opportunities, as well as additional license revenue and economic value that could be flowing to the state from sport fisheries.

The economic impact of the recreational sport fishing industry far outpaces commercial fishing. In Willapa Bay, recreational fishing generates three-and-a-half times more economic value than the commercial fishery, despite catching only 7 percent of the fish. A federal study pegged the annual economic value of Columbia River recreational fisheries at $36 million, but credited only $2.1 million to non-tribal commercial fisheries. Locally, in the 18th Legislative District, 13,500 recreational fishing licenses are sold each year along with 10,000 Columbia River salmon endorsements. Just two other legislative districts in the state sell more Columbia River salmon endorsements than our district.

Recreational anglers don't just buy fishing licenses. They buy fishing tackle, bait, and large items, such as fishing boats, trailers and trucks to pull their vessels to and from their favorite fishing spots. They buy gas, snacks and beverages to consume while they are waiting for the fish to bite. They buy smokers, grills and freezers. Despite DFW's restrictions, recreational fishing contributes hundreds of millions of dollars to our state's economy each year with much of it flowing to Washington’s rural communities.

Overall, recreational fishing is a $1 billion industry in Washington. We believe this could blossom into a much larger industry with economic benefits for Washington and the state’s general fund through a change of policies and priorities. That’s why we have introduced House Bill 1660. The bill would transform Washington into a world-class fishing destination by providing parity to recreational fishing enthusiasts and ensuring fishing opportunities are consistent with user groups’ economic contributions.


Let's face it, sport fishing tourists will spend their money in the most desirable and competitive locations, whether here in Washington or other states or countries. Why should we let DFW constraints send sport fishing tourists elsewhere when we can attract those dollars here? Let's work together and pass HB 1660 to transform Washington's recreational fishing into a multi-billion dollar industry, improve our fragile rural economies still struggling from the Great Recession, and ensure DFW begins serving its primary customer and source of revenue. Contact your Washington state legislators at 1-800-562-6000 and urge them to support HB 1660.

Editor’s note: Rep. Liz Pike, R-Camas, serves the 18th Legislative District. Bryan Irwin is the Coastal Conservation Association’s former executive director. Dave Patterson is a recreational fishing enthusiast from Camas.



Representative Liz Pike
Washington State, 18th Legislative District
(360) 786-7812 | LEG 122B
P.O. Box 40600 | Olympia, WA 98504-0600

Online baldopepper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 2716
Re: HB 1660 - Contact your rep!
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2015, 12:09:52 PM »
If you think this info is disturbing, go sit thru a North of Falcon process sometime.  It will turn your stomach when you actually see how the seasons and allocations are set.

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5534
Re: HB 1660 - Contact your rep!
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2015, 12:14:33 PM »
I've been very involved in NOF the last few years.  It's a joke.  But, it is getting a little better as of late.

Online baldopepper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 2716
Re: HB 1660 - Contact your rep!
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2015, 12:25:03 PM »
I agree, it has gotten somewhat better.  Still very frustrating.  I threw the towel in several years ago when it appeared the commercial boys and the tribes were fighting to see who would get to catch the last salmon.  Escapement goals were a joke and sometimes we'd spend hours arguing over just 40-50 ( or less) fish for a certain tributary.  As a sportsfishing representative you were made to fill like a 3rd class citizen. The argument in the above article was the same as we used then, hope it works better now.

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5534
Re: HB 1660 - Contact your rep!
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2015, 12:36:41 PM »
I just saw that, as of yesterday, it has a companion senate bill.  Maybe Blake won't be as successful as he hoped in killing it.

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7218
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: HB 1660 - Contact your rep!
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2015, 01:14:24 PM »
Good bill.  :tup:  Emails sent

Thanks for posting this.

Here the link to the bill :

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?bill=1660&year=2015
« Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 01:41:22 PM by CP »

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7218
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: HB 1660 - Contact your rep!
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2015, 01:57:13 PM »

Offline CP

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 7218
  • Location: Mukilteo
Re: HB 1660 - Contact your rep!
« Reply #7 on: February 11, 2015, 01:06:51 PM »
Pleasantly surprised with this support:

Thank you so much for contacting me to express your support for HB 1660. As the son of an avid hunter and fisherman, I am proud to be a cosponsor of the senate version of the bill (SB 5844). Both pieces of legislation are currently under review in their respective committees and hopefully we will get a chance to vote on them before the policy cut-off date.

Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or concerns.

All my best,

Marko

Senator Marko Liias
21st Legislative District

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by huntnphool
[Today at 01:19:05 PM]


Pouge unit help by jstone
[Today at 12:47:37 PM]


What are some good 12 ga factory loads for predators? by Blacktail Sniper
[Today at 11:33:03 AM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by ganghis
[Today at 10:04:09 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Sundance
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Shooter4
[Today at 08:10:30 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by HntnFsh
[Today at 08:06:15 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by wadu1
[Today at 07:59:15 AM]


New scope or not? by Sneaky
[Today at 07:02:05 AM]


Making memories by boneaddict
[Today at 06:17:16 AM]


Question about hunting wilderness areas by Threewolves
[Today at 04:01:56 AM]


Called about Returned Alta Buck Permit by Shrimper
[Yesterday at 10:17:51 PM]


Idaho unit 10A by Naches Sportsman
[Yesterday at 08:44:27 PM]


Any MT deer updates? by Britt-dog
[Yesterday at 08:32:50 PM]


Grizzly? by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 07:38:21 PM]


Smith-Reynolds American Legion Post #14 Fall Raffle by Stein
[Yesterday at 07:35:27 PM]


Cash Poor/Equity Rich And Don't Want To Refinance by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 07:13:04 PM]


Palouse buck deer by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 06:27:11 PM]


What pond creature am I dealing with here? by Barehunter
[Yesterday at 06:16:30 PM]


cougar calling locations by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 05:06:42 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal