Free: Contests & Raffles.
The only one,Wow that makes me feel warm and fuzzy all over.I just like everyone else is glad someone brings these up,your not the only one but its nice.You are the only one that brings them up and defends the heck out of them argueing with everyone elses op..If you dont want the opinion of others dont give yours.
Quote from: stevemiller on January 21, 2015, 12:06:34 PMThe only one,Wow that makes me feel warm and fuzzy all over.I just like everyone else is glad someone brings these up,your not the only one but its nice.You are the only one that brings them up and defends the heck out of them argueing with everyone elses op..If you dont want the opinion of others dont give yours.Soooooooooooo...............would you rather have someone share this information with us publicly here that may not necessarily be brought to light by anyone else?Making posts like this is a sure way to drive away a great source of information directly related to the outdoors in our state.
Have also stated that he/she is entitled to an op. but obviously the ones that dont agree with him/her are not.
I think some day you will see for profit companies conducting Hunter Education.As far as the 8 year old proposed rule it has been talked about for 25 years. The fact is that younger kids are taking up hundreds of seats every year with zero hope of passing. Yes a few do. But most do not.So if not a age limit what is the solution???
Quote from: ghosthunter on January 21, 2015, 12:14:05 PMI think some day you will see for profit companies conducting Hunter Education.As far as the 8 year old proposed rule it has been talked about for 25 years. The fact is that younger kids are taking up hundreds of seats every year with zero hope of passing. Yes a few do. But most do not.So if not a age limit what is the solution???This would be the only reason I would support this. I think, instead of a minimum age, maybe charge a $20 or $50 deposit to take the class. All of it is refunded, or maybe $5 kept, if a student passes. If the student fails, it is completely forfeited. This would make parents of the very young ones be very sure that the kid was able and/or motivated to pass. Just a thought.
Quote from: lokidog on January 23, 2015, 07:04:21 PMQuote from: ghosthunter on January 21, 2015, 12:14:05 PMI think some day you will see for profit companies conducting Hunter Education.As far as the 8 year old proposed rule it has been talked about for 25 years. The fact is that younger kids are taking up hundreds of seats every year with zero hope of passing. Yes a few do. But most do not.So if not a age limit what is the solution???This would be the only reason I would support this. I think, instead of a minimum age, maybe charge a $20 or $50 deposit to take the class. All of it is refunded, or maybe $5 kept, if a student passes. If the student fails, it is completely forfeited. This would make parents of the very young ones be very sure that the kid was able and/or motivated to pass. Just a thought.Courses can charge $20 now.Students that fail usually feel bad enough. I don't think penalizing them further would be a good approach. Unless they're jerks or irresponsible we encourage them to come back when they're a bit older.