collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic  (Read 10022 times)

Offline jumpin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 183
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2015, 07:24:35 PM »
 Looks to me like the water conditions are perfect. Miraculously they have re-populated in two seasons.

Offline BABackcountryBwhntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 350
  • Location: SW Wa
  • Groups: NRA,CCA,RMEF,WSA,NFAA....
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #16 on: May 31, 2015, 02:02:58 PM »
Looks to me like the water conditions are perfect. Miraculously they have re-populated in two seasons.


They are far from repopulated, we still have very few oversize in the gorge... or fish at all for that matter..... You can debate this all you want, and hey maybe you know more then me, I grew up fishing sturgeon, been a guide for 10 years and in my lifetime have landed just a few sturgeon... when I was a kid I would not keep anything under 50 in from the bank because I caught a keeper every cast.. literally for 5 + years..... I saw the numbers start to go south in the late 90s and it has continued..... but its all water conditions according to you.

Offline wildmanoutdoors

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 2459
  • Location: Port Orchard
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2015, 02:12:09 PM »
They almost opened it this year but rumer is there waiting till next...

If you fished the estuary for the last few years youd know how the run has declined over the last 15 years.

I dont know if the fish Paul is fishing are the ones comming from the ocean or not? This is the time though.
This would be awesome but where did you hear this from?

Read the minutes from the season setting minutes this spring. It was brought up to open it this season but the commission decided to wait one more year.

Offline jumpin

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 183
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #18 on: May 31, 2015, 04:46:23 PM »
I think a fourty fish 1/2 day tells all. I have never been close to that.  Our camp at deep river for the last twenty years out fished most by far.
 I would agree the pools and lakes above all of our dams have been pounded pretty hard.

Im wondering if keeper size sturgeon can use the fish ladders during their spawning migration? Maybe those should be the areas shut down.

Offline LabChamp

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2012
  • Posts: 538
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #19 on: May 31, 2015, 05:53:28 PM »
I think a fourty fish 1/2 day tells all. I have never been close to that.  Our camp at deep river for the last twenty years out fished most by far.
 I would agree the pools and lakes above all of our dams have been pounded pretty hard.

Im wondering if keeper size sturgeon can use the fish ladders during their spawning migration? Maybe those should be the areas shut down.

Keeper size aren't able to spawn yet

Offline TONTO

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1018
  • Location: Longview,WA
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2015, 07:08:26 PM »
 It was the guide influx of the 90's after the salmon crash. There are still plenty of fish, they just can't take the hurt of the guide fleet limiting out every day. Yeah I grew up fishing sturgeon, still remember the three fish a day limit 36"-72", didn't even need a license to fish for them then, but there was not the same pressure as now, seemed nobody fished for sturgeon and most even considered them trash. Then in the 80's the columbia river salmon runs took a dive and more and more started targeting sturgeon. Throw in how easy it became to get an Oregon guide license and the pressure increased 10 fold. There are still plenty of fish, last time the Willamette was opened the quota was caught in one day, that doesn't happen with no fish in the river, but it is the pressure on the fishery that it cannot sustain. The last year it was open in the estuary all I heard from the guides was how there weren't any fish, well no @#$%! the same guys were fishing the same spots over and over day in and out limiting full boats. I was fishing solo as far from the guide fleet as I could get and had no problem getting my two and releasing many keeper sized fish. The lower Cowlitz was stuffed with fish this year, Ive seen lots of them hooked on salmon gear as bycatch, just because they aren't always in the same hole doesn't mean they don't exist.

Offline BABackcountryBwhntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 350
  • Location: SW Wa
  • Groups: NRA,CCA,RMEF,WSA,NFAA....
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #21 on: June 01, 2015, 10:23:19 AM »
It was the guide influx of the 90's after the salmon crash. There are still plenty of fish, they just can't take the hurt of the guide fleet limiting out every day. Yeah I grew up fishing sturgeon, still remember the three fish a day limit 36"-72", didn't even need a license to fish for them then, but there was not the same pressure as now, seemed nobody fished for sturgeon and most even considered them trash. Then in the 80's the columbia river salmon runs took a dive and more and more started targeting sturgeon. Throw in how easy it became to get an Oregon guide license and the pressure increased 10 fold. There are still plenty of fish, last time the Willamette was opened the quota was caught in one day, that doesn't happen with no fish in the river, but it is the pressure on the fishery that it cannot sustain. The last year it was open in the estuary all I heard from the guides was how there weren't any fish, well no @#$%! the same guys were fishing the same spots over and over day in and out limiting full boats. I was fishing solo as far from the guide fleet as I could get and had no problem getting my two and releasing many keeper sized fish. The lower Cowlitz was stuffed with fish this year, Ive seen lots of them hooked on salmon gear as bycatch, just because they aren't always in the same hole doesn't mean they don't exist.


This is funny to me, you blame the guides, yet the quota was the same.... it does not matter if guides or recreational guys catch fish... a quota is a quota... the issue was the huge quotas back in those days.. some years it was 60k fish... toss in poaching and the fact ODFW has no clue how many fish are really caught and you get severe overfishing of the resource. The willy was a zoo... of course the quota was met in 1 day when there is 6k boats on that river.... not a surprise there.  The numbers of fish have been drastically going down, and even though there are some fish around currently... a few days of retention would end that... it needs to stay this way for a very long time.

Offline BABackcountryBwhntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 350
  • Location: SW Wa
  • Groups: NRA,CCA,RMEF,WSA,NFAA....
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #22 on: June 01, 2015, 10:25:35 AM »
I think a fourty fish 1/2 day tells all. I have never been close to that.  Our camp at deep river for the last twenty years out fished most by far.
 I would agree the pools and lakes above all of our dams have been pounded pretty hard.

Im wondering if keeper size sturgeon can use the fish ladders during their spawning migration? Maybe those should be the areas shut down.


it tells me there were some fish in that area.. and as a kid we used to have 50 keeper days out of deep river pretty easily... I am sure we had some 80+ fish days as well... so you should have if you were one of the better boats down there.... the fishing at the coast was much better back then then the day we had from this post.

Offline singleshot12

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3445
  • Location: N.W. Washington
  • WWA,PF
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #23 on: June 01, 2015, 12:23:16 PM »
It was the guide influx of the 90's after the salmon crash. There are still plenty of fish, they just can't take the hurt of the guide fleet limiting out every day. Yeah I grew up fishing sturgeon, still remember the three fish a day limit 36"-72", didn't even need a license to fish for them then, but there was not the same pressure as now, seemed nobody fished for sturgeon and most even considered them trash. Then in the 80's the columbia river salmon runs took a dive and more and more started targeting sturgeon. Throw in how easy it became to get an Oregon guide license and the pressure increased 10 fold. There are still plenty of fish, last time the Willamette was opened the quota was caught in one day, that doesn't happen with no fish in the river, but it is the pressure on the fishery that it cannot sustain. The last year it was open in the estuary all I heard from the guides was how there weren't any fish, well no @#$%! the same guys were fishing the same spots over and over day in and out limiting full boats. I was fishing solo as far from the guide fleet as I could get and had no problem getting my two and releasing many keeper sized fish. The lower Cowlitz was stuffed with fish this year, Ive seen lots of them hooked on salmon gear as bycatch, just because they aren't always in the same hole doesn't mean they don't exist.

 :yeah: that too has put a major dent in it. They've been exploited and commercialized drastically for the last ten years. Doesn't take long between that and the black market poachers.

Jumpin :dunno:?? but having a real hard time seeing where you're coming from?
NATURE HAS A WAY

"All good things must come to an end"

SEARCHING FOR TRUTH, SEARCHING FOR PURITY, something that doesn't really exist anymore..

Offline BABackcountryBwhntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 350
  • Location: SW Wa
  • Groups: NRA,CCA,RMEF,WSA,NFAA....
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #24 on: June 01, 2015, 01:20:50 PM »
It was the guide influx of the 90's after the salmon crash. There are still plenty of fish, they just can't take the hurt of the guide fleet limiting out every day. Yeah I grew up fishing sturgeon, still remember the three fish a day limit 36"-72", didn't even need a license to fish for them then, but there was not the same pressure as now, seemed nobody fished for sturgeon and most even considered them trash. Then in the 80's the columbia river salmon runs took a dive and more and more started targeting sturgeon. Throw in how easy it became to get an Oregon guide license and the pressure increased 10 fold. There are still plenty of fish, last time the Willamette was opened the quota was caught in one day, that doesn't happen with no fish in the river, but it is the pressure on the fishery that it cannot sustain. The last year it was open in the estuary all I heard from the guides was how there weren't any fish, well no @#$%! the same guys were fishing the same spots over and over day in and out limiting full boats. I was fishing solo as far from the guide fleet as I could get and had no problem getting my two and releasing many keeper sized fish. The lower Cowlitz was stuffed with fish this year, Ive seen lots of them hooked on salmon gear as bycatch, just because they aren't always in the same hole doesn't mean they don't exist.

 :yeah: that too has put a major dent in it. They've been exploited and commercialized drastically for the last ten years. Doesn't take long between that and the black market poachers.

Jumpin :dunno:?? but having a real hard time seeing where you're coming from?


There is no doubt guides played a part, but what you guys are missing is what I have already stated. guides would not be allowed to fish if the quota was met.... the quota is the issue.. not who is killing the fish..... combine 10+ years of grossly high quotas+ sea lions killin tens of thousands a year+ poaching+ enviromental factors and you have a recipe for a huge population crash.... you can not expect the river system to be able to sustain that kind of decimation. These fish take 15+ years to reach mature keeper size... and we have no hatcherys.... the writing was on the wall a long time ago...... you do not need a biology degree to see the issue here.

Offline cohoho

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4202
  • Location: Black Diamond
  • Sturgeon Time Yet????
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #25 on: June 01, 2015, 05:33:07 PM »
I gotta agree with Paul here, as the quota numbers moved up so did the number of people fishing, netting etc...  Yes, Amount of people fishing, guides, sea lions were factors, but commercial by-catch in nets and native netting played a huge factor too...   When I first moved here from AK I was seriously bored with Salmon, so I decided to learn everything I possibly could about Sturgeon, so I targeted them pretty hard core for the first three or four summers.  We had several 70+ fish days, numerous 50+ days and getting over 35 fish to the boat was pretty easy, we had 9-10 fish oversized days and plenty of keepers sized fish to make any bar-be-que grill happy...     Going above the dam was a like catching fish at the Sportsman show fish pond...   And the best part 75% were keeper sized.  Go there now and get several but all shakers and anything near 37" has net marks, again hmmmm, wonder where those marks came from???   There are several other issues going on, shad numbers were down a bit, lampreys were down and of course smelt were in big decline.  Hmmm if my grocery store was out of food I liked and I had the means to go to another store, later!  Between those factors and everything else everyone already listed, Sturgeon were easy to fall in decline....   But again why the decline above the dam?  Can't blame the sea lions, can't blame fish left the river to find food source, can't blame guides - hmmm wonder what it was? 

Heck removing the fishing for personal retention and consumption probably enhanced the taking of the fish - no guides/no personal boats keeping tabs on the folks throwing nets?  Hmmm-  again wonder where some of the decline of these awesome beasts is from?  Keep it C&R and it is fine by me, love catching them and nobody is on the water fishing for them, so it really makes the day enjoyable...  Remove the nets (for everyone) and fish have a chance to grow back to keeper size. 

Offline DIYARCHERYJUNKIE

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 3106
  • Location: hoodcanal
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #26 on: June 02, 2015, 06:54:04 AM »
 :yeah:

Offline BABackcountryBwhntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 350
  • Location: SW Wa
  • Groups: NRA,CCA,RMEF,WSA,NFAA....
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #27 on: June 02, 2015, 08:44:38 AM »
The pool fishery is a sad deal... it was over fished imo again with quotas being too large, but the Indian nets are the real issue here and I have no problem saying that. The fact they police themselves is a joke. They are supposed to have the same quota us white guys do... not a chance. . I watched 2 guys fill 3 huge totes with keepers at drano one afternoon... I counted over 200... the quota was 1000 thar winter.. do any of you really think they only killed 1000 fish?

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #28 on: June 02, 2015, 11:50:21 AM »
I think there is a lot of poaching going on.  I saw it on the news of people hooking up and tying the fish up until it gets dark.  They showed pictures of a dude who was laying down on the bank and the fish was at least 7 - 8 feet long.  THey were cutting the roe out and selling it for 50,000 dollars.
275 down 2

Offline BABackcountryBwhntr

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 350
  • Location: SW Wa
  • Groups: NRA,CCA,RMEF,WSA,NFAA....
Re: Sturgeon fishing was fantastic
« Reply #29 on: June 02, 2015, 11:52:50 AM »
I think there is a lot of poaching going on.  I saw it on the news of people hooking up and tying the fish up until it gets dark.  They showed pictures of a dude who was laying down on the bank and the fish was at least 7 - 8 feet long.  THey were cutting the roe out and selling it for 50,000 dollars.
[/quot

I have no doubts it goes on, but that does not effect the keeper and shaker numbers.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Today at 09:55:24 AM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:06:18 AM]


erronulvin trail cam photos by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:55:12 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by Clearcut
[Today at 05:05:05 AM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by lazydrifter
[Today at 03:33:12 AM]


If you've been following.... by HighlandLofts
[Today at 03:03:24 AM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 08:06:11 PM]


45 Winchester Magnum by poor_choices
[Yesterday at 07:01:02 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by JKEEN33
[Yesterday at 06:49:08 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 05:34:55 PM]


Sportsman Alliance files petition to Gov Ferguson for removal of corrupt WA Wildlife Commissioners by lewy
[Yesterday at 10:30:15 AM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by BLH69
[Yesterday at 08:58:57 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by mountainman
[Yesterday at 08:48:35 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal