collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Range finders  (Read 15361 times)

Offline jjhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 2262
  • Location: Mule Deer Country
  • Aim small. Miss small.
Re: Range finders
« Reply #30 on: December 24, 2015, 10:30:21 AM »
Of the big 3, the Leicas are the least reliable in any kind of weather.   I've owned every one of 'em in the last 15 years and it's always been the case.   That being said, they do make my favorite bino/rangefinder combo - all things being considered.

If I was only concerned with rangefinder reliability (especially in weather), I'd go with the Zeiss.   It is an amazing rangefinder with regard to reliability in weather and responsiveness.



 

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Range finders
« Reply #31 on: December 24, 2015, 10:36:33 AM »
We went shooting steel last Sunday and the Leica my friend had, dd not work with a little bit of fog. So, I guess, they're not as perfect as all claim.
low battery maybe?  Mine will basically range it as long as I can see it :dunno:



No, just couldn't pick up the targets.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21748
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Range finders
« Reply #32 on: December 24, 2015, 10:52:54 AM »
Of the big 3, the Leicas are the least reliable in any kind of weather.   I've owned every one of 'em in the last 15 years and it's always been the case.   That being said, they do make my favorite bino/rangefinder combo - all things being considered.

If I was only concerned with rangefinder reliability (especially in weather), I'd go with the Zeiss.   It is an amazing rangefinder with regard to reliability in weather and responsiveness.
Leicas appear to have more issues in fog than others, but others are not immune. All things considered, I still prefer Leicas over all others. :twocents:

http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1619042
http://forums.bowsite.com/tf/bgforums/thread.cfm?forum=2&threadid=415694
http://forums.bowhunting.com/bowhunting-talk/rangefinders-not-working-fog-58625/
http://www.ifish.net/board/showthread.php?t=868329


Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Range finders
« Reply #33 on: December 24, 2015, 11:46:23 AM »
Has anybody had a chance to check out the new Sig Kilo 2000 rangefinder? It's price is appealing if it is as good as it claims.

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Range finders
« Reply #34 on: December 24, 2015, 02:49:41 PM »
Of the big 3, the Leicas are the least reliable in any kind of weather.   I've owned every one of 'em in the last 15 years and it's always been the case.   That being said, they do make my favorite bino/rangefinder combo - all things being considered.

If I was only concerned with rangefinder reliability (especially in weather), I'd go with the Zeiss.   It is an amazing rangefinder with regard to reliability in weather and responsiveness.
Leicas appear to have more issues in fog than others, but others are not immune. All things considered, I still prefer Leicas over all others. :twocents:

http://www.archerytalk.com/vb/showthread.php?t=1619042
http://forums.bowsite.com/tf/bgforums/thread.cfm?forum=2&threadid=415694
http://forums.bowhunting.com/bowhunting-talk/rangefinders-not-working-fog-58625/
http://www.ifish.net/board/showthread.php?t=868329



The guy I was with is a retired Border Patrol agent and everything has to be perfect. He loves and swears by Leicas no matter what.
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline Tenkara

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 863
Re: Range finders
« Reply #35 on: December 25, 2015, 07:42:55 AM »
Leica.  :tup:

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21748
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Range finders
« Reply #36 on: December 25, 2015, 07:53:41 AM »
Has anybody had a chance to check out the new Sig Kilo 2000 rangefinder? It's price is appealing if it is as good as it claims.
The initial reviews sound promising and could bump Leica if true.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Range finders
« Reply #37 on: December 25, 2015, 09:53:55 PM »
Has anybody had a chance to check out the new Sig Kilo 2000 rangefinder? It's price is appealing if it is as good as it claims.
The initial reviews sound promising and could bump Leica if true.
Kinda what I was thinking. Cabelas recently added it to their website. I think I'll have to wait until they get one in stock at their Lacey store so I can check it out.

Offline TheHunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 6238
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: Range finders
« Reply #38 on: December 25, 2015, 10:38:44 PM »
I have the Leica and a bunch of others.  I am looking at the Leica 1600.  If there is a better one out there I would love to check it out.   I bow hunt elk but rifle deer. 
275 down 2

Offline heronblu

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2012
  • Posts: 366
  • Location: Deming
Re: Range finders
« Reply #39 on: December 26, 2015, 10:11:25 AM »
Ive got a vortex 1000 and i love the thing.  I know some people have complained about the slow readout but I have been really impressed with the accuracy of it and I've never felt like I needed it to read any faster. Also you cannot beat vortex warranty and customer service. Plus it's the only one that I found in that price range that claimed to be actually waterproof (a must for where I live).

Offline Shooting Stix

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 877
  • Location: Spanaway, Washington/Germany
Re: Range finders
« Reply #40 on: January 24, 2016, 02:26:12 PM »
I bought a bushnell years ago and that gadget was big and hard to read then I went with a Nikon and it was a lot better but still wasn't that good but when I went to South Africa I gave it to my PH for my appreciation for all the hard work he did to make sure I was successful so now I want one more for bowhunting because when I rifle hunt I don't feel comfortable shooting long distance. I want one that will help with the downhill/uphill shots because once I see antlers I'm not thinking to take away or add it's shoot.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21748
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Range finders
« Reply #41 on: January 24, 2016, 02:32:57 PM »
Has anybody had a chance to check out the new Sig Kilo 2000 rangefinder? It's price is appealing if it is as good as it claims.
The initial reviews sound promising and could bump Leica if true.
Kinda what I was thinking. Cabelas recently added it to their website. I think I'll have to wait until they get one in stock at their Lacey store so I can check it out.

hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,189297.0.html

I have been testing the Sig for a couple weeks. It has bumped my Leica 1600 as the preferred rangefinder.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Range finders
« Reply #42 on: February 07, 2016, 07:07:54 PM »
The new Sig Sauer kilo2000 is supposed to be better than anything out there.... :dunno:
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

No trespassing, hunting, fishing signs posted along Skykomish river by Night goat
[Today at 04:28:57 AM]


That "lake taste" in freshwater fish by Night goat
[Today at 04:28:00 AM]


Bear Scratch on Tree by dreadi
[Yesterday at 10:53:30 PM]


NEED ADVICE: LATE after JUNE 15th IDAHO BEAR by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:52:52 PM]


90's Yamaha no telltale? by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 10:04:40 PM]


Archery elk gear, 2025. by blackveltbowhunter
[Yesterday at 09:36:02 PM]


E scouting for bears by SpicyTacos
[Yesterday at 09:26:03 PM]


Grayback Youth Hunt by Big6bull
[Yesterday at 08:20:59 PM]


Pocket Carry by fly-by
[Yesterday at 06:35:19 PM]


Rimrock Bull: Modern by str8meat
[Yesterday at 06:25:53 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by HillHound
[Yesterday at 05:36:47 PM]


SWAKANE EWE by vandeman17
[Yesterday at 02:55:45 PM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by Buzzsaw461
[Yesterday at 02:44:10 PM]


Video highlighting and discussing WDFW corruption by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 01:42:41 PM]


Tease 'l' by kellama2001
[Yesterday at 01:23:41 PM]


What barrel length 24”, 26” or 28” by Call em in
[Yesterday at 12:47:43 PM]


Game trails to nowhere? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 12:38:05 PM]


PROOF RESEARCH CLOSEOUT by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:35:23 PM]


Article on the beaver trapping ban in OR by Humptulips
[Yesterday at 12:27:08 PM]


Go kill some dogs! by fowl smacker
[Yesterday at 11:27:32 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal