Free: Contests & Raffles.
Don't get me wrong; I don't trust the federal government, especially when the word "environmental" is used. However, until there's some proof that what's being done is outside of the parameters of PR or the Fish Act, I'm not biting. Congress is well aware of PR and what the money is to be used for.
Quote from: pianoman9701 on March 08, 2016, 10:06:07 AMDon't get me wrong; I don't trust the federal government, especially when the word "environmental" is used. However, until there's some proof that what's being done is outside of the parameters of PR or the Fish Act, I'm not biting. Congress is well aware of PR and what the money is to be used for. Per the P-R Act, if the money is required to be distributed to state fish and game departments, and instead its being given to the Department of Ecology, isn't that prima facie evidence of illegal distribution?
Perhaps I'm wrong as well. I went to and read the original article and neither it or Faux News (Unfair and Biased) are clear to me. To me it reads like the money is going to state departments other than Fish and Game.
I think one has to ask why Obama is involved specifically. My guess is money is going somewhere it is not intended to go.
Quote from: Wacenturion on March 10, 2016, 05:00:47 PMI think one has to ask why Obama is involved specifically. My guess is money is going somewhere it is not intended to go.