collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens  (Read 2808 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« on: June 09, 2016, 08:41:44 AM »


http://tdn.com/lifestyles/wdfw-hopes-to-expand-wildlife-area-in-toutle-river-valley/article_7290a6cc-1eb2-5d79-a172-324873018d59.html

 Some of this transaction has been discussed before, but it is a long process.  One big issue is the 7,000 WDFW St. Helens Wildlife area has NO legal public access and no public use easements.  So this public land is completely at the mercy of Weyerhaeuser.  In one place 180 FEET separates the wildlife area with the highway!   The public land can't apply for recreation grants because it has no legal access. 

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25062
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #1 on: June 09, 2016, 09:32:20 AM »
What I want to know is why does the state grant acess across its lands for private companies like wh if they dont?
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Dhoey07

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3354
  • Location: Parts Unknown
    • No Facebook for this guy
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #2 on: June 09, 2016, 09:36:14 AM »
So why do they need a 10 million dollar acquisition?  Why don't they purchase a 100' strip for access?

Offline headshot5

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1398
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2016, 10:38:59 AM »
Quote
What I want to know is why does the state grant access across its lands for private companies like wh if they dont?

They do, that's how the state logs landlocked land behind locked WH gates.  Generally access is written in for Fire patrols/Fire Fighting, and for logging/maintenance. 

It isn't however generally written in for public access.   

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25062
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #4 on: June 09, 2016, 11:13:22 AM »
It should be
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7347
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #5 on: June 09, 2016, 11:51:19 AM »
Wow, I do wish they could get this done but cant help being angry that weyco has been allowed to restrict access to public land.  They really have their way with this state.  More so than the Gov. or people.  Cake and Ice Cream too!  High lakes area appeals to me a lot.  However this would all be special permit draws so State could collect revenue thus restricting access to hunters.  Back to square one. 
MAGA!  Again..

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: land acquisition Proposals Near Mount St. Helens
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2016, 01:08:36 PM »
So why do they need a 10 million dollar acquisition?  Why don't they purchase a 100' strip for access?

That might happen--the strip would secure a place for an access trail and has an existing road to near the sediment dam, but the main block of the "mudflow" is via the 3100 which is further up the valley past Hoffstadt bridge.  I think the state is starting with the whole enchilada, and will end up working backward to something smaller, like the strip plus maybe a public use easement on the 3100.  They could do conservation easements with public access on the rest if the dollars for purchase are too much. 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Getting the hang of hanging on to mallards! by Goshawk
[Today at 07:58:06 AM]


A great stormy weekend for bucks, now don't forget to... by Goshawk
[Today at 07:56:19 AM]


Colville lodging, any recommendations? by Pathfinder101
[Today at 07:36:23 AM]


King of the mountain caught sleeping by HighlandLofts
[Today at 07:32:31 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by 300rum
[Today at 07:23:58 AM]


NAVY BEAN SOUP by Alchase
[Today at 07:17:02 AM]


Letter of Complaint to WDFW/CWD by HereDuckyDucky
[Today at 07:13:21 AM]


Harlequin in weird places? by metlhead
[Today at 07:07:13 AM]


Another Mushroom we need ID on by Southpole
[Today at 07:02:54 AM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by JDArms1240
[Today at 07:02:38 AM]


The 33 year quest by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 04:55:56 AM]


Wall Tents Tips and Tricks by spin05
[Yesterday at 11:41:02 PM]


Blood trailing in the rain by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 11:23:07 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by pashok23
[Yesterday at 10:28:08 PM]


Flynn’s Hunts!!! by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 09:01:20 PM]


Mushroom ID by jrebel
[Yesterday at 07:57:13 PM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Booner
[Yesterday at 07:03:22 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 05:42:25 PM]


Skagit Question by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 05:40:00 PM]


Blue mountains deer permit by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 02:53:47 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal