collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?  (Read 13836 times)

Offline Tyler_C

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 100
6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« on: July 20, 2016, 04:18:02 PM »
I hunt mule deer on the east side of the state, and my shots have ranged from 50 to 350 yards. I currently use a .270 win. Would I benefit at all to switch to the 6.5 Creedmoor? I'm new to this cartridge, so I'm needing input. also, what are the best hunting rounds for the CM? I don't reload, either.

Thank you.
« Last Edit: July 20, 2016, 04:23:51 PM by Tyler_C »

Offline headshot5

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Posts: 1396
  • Location: Port Orchard, WA
Re: 6.5 Creedmor or not?
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2016, 04:19:56 PM »
Quote
I hunt mule deer on the east side of the state, and my shots have ranged from 50 to 350 yards. I currently use a .270 win. Would I benefit at all to switch to the 6.5 Creedmoor? I'm new to this cartridge, so I'm needing input. also, what are the best hunting rounds for the CM? I don't reload, either.

I'd roll with the .270 if that's what you have already.  No need for anything else for deer between 50 and 350.   :dunno:

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: 6.5 Creedmor or not?
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2016, 04:28:18 PM »
Quote
I hunt mule deer on the east side of the state, and my shots have ranged from 50 to 350 yards. I currently use a .270 win. Would I benefit at all to switch to the 6.5 Creedmoor? I'm new to this cartridge, so I'm needing input. also, what are the best hunting rounds for the CM? I don't reload, either.

I'd roll with the .270 if that's what you have already.  No need for anything else for deer between 50 and 350.   :dunno:
:yeah: the cm won't do anything your 270 can do. Unless you just want another gun.  :chuckle:

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10665
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: 6.5 Creedmor or not?
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2016, 05:16:38 PM »
Quote
I hunt mule deer on the east side of the state, and my shots have ranged from 50 to 350 yards. I currently use a .270 win. Would I benefit at all to switch to the 6.5 Creedmoor? I'm new to this cartridge, so I'm needing input. also, what are the best hunting rounds for the CM? I don't reload, either.

I'd roll with the .270 if that's what you have already.  No need for anything else for deer between 50 and 350.   :dunno:
:yeah: the cm won't do anything your 270 can do. Unless you just want another gun.  :chuckle:
  :yeah:  wait a minute!  This is a lie!  The .270 is grossly inadequate and you need to buy a 6.5 CM as soon as possible!  At least that's what you need to tell your wife 8)
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Tyler_C

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 100
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2016, 06:11:53 PM »
Which is better for elk?

Offline BULLBLASTER

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 8104
Re: 6.5 Creedmor or not?
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2016, 06:18:23 PM »
Quote
I hunt mule deer on the east side of the state, and my shots have ranged from 50 to 350 yards. I currently use a .270 win. Would I benefit at all to switch to the 6.5 Creedmoor? I'm new to this cartridge, so I'm needing input. also, what are the best hunting rounds for the CM? I don't reload, either.

I'd roll with the .270 if that's what you have already.  No need for anything else for deer between 50 and 350.   :dunno:
:yeah: the cm won't do anything your 270 can do. Unless you just want another gun.  :chuckle:
  :yeah:  wait a minute!  This is a lie!  The .270 is grossly inadequate and you need to buy a 6.5 CM as soon as possible!  At least that's what you need to tell your wife 8)
:bash: how could I be so wrong!?   :dunno:

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11337
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2016, 06:21:31 PM »
Ballistically they are very similar.....  Both will push a 130 to 150 grain bullet at roughly 2800 fps.  So to answer you question.....both are superier for elk.  140 grain bonded bullet out of the creedmoor will kill elk dead.  150 grain partition out of the 270 will kill elk just as dead. 

I say you buy a 6.5 and report back with success pics.   :tup:

Offline Wingin it

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 907
  • Location: Washington
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2016, 07:08:22 PM »
You absolutely must have the CM! I have absolutely no Concrete data to offer but hey another gun is always a good thing!

Offline crabcreekhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 832
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2016, 08:19:37 PM »
Stick with .270 a bonded 130 grain bullet at 3200 fps will knock whatever deer or elk you want down at that range no problem.. and can shoot plenty well out to a grand. Save some money buy some more ammo and have fun
"Courage is simply fear that has said its prayers"

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11337
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2016, 08:24:57 PM »
Stick with .270 a bonded 130 grain bullet at 3200 fps will knock whatever deer or elk you want down at that range no problem.. and can shoot plenty well out to a grand. Save some money buy some more ammo and have fun

Are you hand loading to get those speeds?  If so do you mind sharing your load, bullet, powder, etc.  I have yet to find a .270 that will stabilize at the upper ends and have been trying for years.  I would love to know the magic recipe. 

Thanks

Offline crabcreekhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 832
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2016, 08:46:25 PM »
The actual load data is at the reloading room in Moses  and don't remember quite off the top of my head but using a 130 Berger classic hunter not a bonded bullet but very deadly,  and vihtavuori n560 pretty stiff, shaken not stirred, I'd recommend working up to your max pressure in your rifle of course.. two of our .270s it won't work with now from throat erosion.  Berger are finicky in all rifles I load for but once dialed are pretty sweet and classic hunters are a lot better in seating depth forgiveness than the vlds.  Hope that helps, in 24 and 26 inch tubes.. also have shot the Sierra game kings for years with good results but lower velo.
"Courage is simply fear that has said its prayers"

Offline huntnphool

  • Chance favors the prepared mind!
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 32898
  • Location: Pacific NorthWest
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2016, 08:50:27 PM »
Stick with .270 a bonded 130 grain bullet at 3200 fps will knock whatever deer or elk you want down at that range no problem.. and can shoot plenty well out to a grand. Save some money buy some more ammo and have fun

 +1, 130 Partition will do just fine too. :tup:
The things that come to those who wait, may be the things left by those who got there first!

Offline Caseknife

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 600
  • Location: Colville
  • Groups: RMEF, NRA, SCI
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2016, 09:16:50 PM »
The .270 will do everything the 6.5 CM will do, but if you feel you need another rifle, the 6.5CM will do everything the .270 will do.  I used my 6.5 CM loaded with 127gr Barnes LRX to harvest my elk last year with no ill effects, other than the elk's.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10665
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #13 on: July 20, 2016, 09:57:53 PM »
Some of you aren't very good at this whole peer pressure thing :chuckle:  Trust me man, you really need a 6.5!  .270 just won't cut it anymore 8)
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Tyler_C

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 100
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2016, 09:59:59 PM »
I know, I know. Just didn't know if the CM was better ballistically. Could always use another gun. Any other cartidges that are superior?

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39203
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #15 on: July 20, 2016, 10:09:10 PM »

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11337
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2016, 10:18:59 PM »
Isn't the new one a 6.5 x 300?  My guess is that would be superior if you are looking at muzzle velocities. 

Offline Tyler_C

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 100
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2016, 10:27:42 PM »
Is the 300 win mag too big for what I'm needing?

Offline Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18094
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #18 on: July 20, 2016, 10:37:52 PM »
Is the 300 win mag too big for what I'm needing?

No, it's not too big.

It is a great elk cartridge.

Personally, if I had a 270 already, I'd pick something significantly different  ballistically speaking (i.e. not a 6.5 Creed).

A 300 Win Mag fits the bill.

And since you don't reload, it comes in tons of factory loads (unlike the Creedmoor).
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

Offline JoeE

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 1171
  • Location: Soldotna AK
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2016, 03:03:49 AM »
Is the 300 win mag too big for what I'm needing?

No, it's not too big.

It is a great elk cartridge.

Personally, if I had a 270 already, I'd pick something significantly different  ballistically speaking (i.e. not a 6.5 Creed).

A 300 Win Mag fits the bill.

And since you don't reload, it comes in tons of factory loads (unlike the Creedmoor).

+1 stick with the 270 or jump up to a 300wm

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10665
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #20 on: July 21, 2016, 06:50:58 AM »
In all seriousness, 400 and in, most all calibers are too close to make any difference.  Even the 300 winny.  All will put the smack down on even a big bull elk.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline longrange7mm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 874
  • Location: Wyoming
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #21 on: July 21, 2016, 07:33:42 PM »
If your happy with that 270 and it shoots good invest in optics and look at loading some of the new 170 gr elite hunters from berger "only if your lucky and have a 1:8 twist or faster though" You most likely have a 1:10 and the 140 gr vlds shoot really good out of most factory rifles I have been around.. Im going back and forth on building a wild cat just to shoot these heavy little copper coated killing pills!  :chuckle: But if you want a new gun and are wanting a creed I SUPPORT YOUR DECISION!!!
Never to far, Just grab another minute!

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2961
  • Location: FL350
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #22 on: July 21, 2016, 08:28:03 PM »
Save or spend your money on something else. In the field there's no difference.

Offline NWShooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 239
  • Location: Oregon
  • Groups: RockyMountain Elk foundation, Mule Deer Foundation, NRA.
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #23 on: July 23, 2016, 10:55:14 PM »
Stick with .270 a bonded 130 grain bullet at 3200 fps will knock whatever deer or elk you want down at that range no problem.. and can shoot plenty well out to a grand. Save some money buy some more ammo and have fun

 +1, 130 Partition will do just fine too. :tup:

The 6.5 Creedmoor is a excellent cartridge. Take a look at the factory Hornady offerings with the ELD-X.  At the ranges you described it will do it just as clean with less fuss than the averaged .270 Win. Hell the 7x57 is a better suited to the ranges you described than the .270 Win. Better yet you don't have to deal with the slips on their knees in love with the 7mm-08 slug.
A empty vessel makes the most noise.

"Every normal man must be tempted , at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."

Offline NWShooter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2016
  • Posts: 239
  • Location: Oregon
  • Groups: RockyMountain Elk foundation, Mule Deer Foundation, NRA.
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #24 on: July 23, 2016, 10:59:22 PM »
Yeah, the 26 Nosler:

http://www.chuckhawks.com/26Nosler.htm


Pick one of those up. I'll lone you my magneto speed and let me know the real world speeds because I already know them.
A empty vessel makes the most noise.

"Every normal man must be tempted , at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats."

Offline Tyler_C

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Sep 2012
  • Posts: 100
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #25 on: July 24, 2016, 04:23:48 PM »
Though nice, the 26 Nosler rifles are a bit more than I want to pay... the .264 bullets are interesting to me... very good BC and SD.

Offline mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6002
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #26 on: July 26, 2016, 09:36:41 PM »
Stick with .270 a bonded 130 grain bullet at 3200 fps will knock whatever deer or elk you want down at that range no problem.. and can shoot plenty well out to a grand. Save some money buy some more ammo and have fun

 +1, 130 Partition will do just fine too. :tup:

The 6.5 Creedmoor is a excellent cartridge. Take a look at the factory Hornady offerings with the ELD-X.  At the ranges you described it will do it just as clean with less fuss than the averaged .270 Win. Hell the 7x57 is a better suited to the ranges you described than the .270 Win. Better yet you don't have to deal with the slips on their knees in love with the 7mm-08 slug.
Mrs. O'Connor thought so, eh NWshooter?
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

Offline Buzz2401

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1207
  • Location: Shelton
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #27 on: July 27, 2016, 12:01:41 AM »
Shooting under 500 yards you will only lose speed and energy going with the creedmoor.  The only advantage it has is available higher B.C. bullets which isn't gonna make much difference at the range you stated.  The Creedmoor is gonna leave about 200fps slower then the 270 and it isn't gonna catch up till about 400-500 yards but after that the 270 is gonna lose.  Thats using the same weight bullet but with a better BC on the 6.5.  I'd spend the money on some better glass or some other new gear ya may need. 

Offline kball4

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 448
  • Location: Kitsap County
  • Groups: RMEF, NRA
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #28 on: July 27, 2016, 08:47:30 AM »
7mm rem mag is a good round for anything you can shoot in Washington.  I shoot Hornady 162gr SST 3000fps at the barrel.

Offline Sakko300wsm

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2015
  • Posts: 1142
  • Location: Lynden
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #29 on: July 27, 2016, 07:36:47 PM »
300wsm is an awesome set up hands down!

Offline mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6002
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: 6.5 Creedmoor or not?
« Reply #30 on: July 28, 2016, 07:02:25 PM »
Save or spend your money on something else. In the field there's no difference.
agree👆 put the money into optics and ammo! Won't save you anything over the .270. Unless you want the Creedmor "just because? That's good enough for me👍
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 10:04:54 PM]


Pocket Carry by bb76
[Yesterday at 08:44:00 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Yesterday at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 07:07:33 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Yesterday at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[July 03, 2025, 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[July 03, 2025, 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal