collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .270 160 gr  (Read 4375 times)

Offline jdb

  • the illustious potentate
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3785
  • Location: selah
.270 160 gr
« on: November 01, 2016, 07:38:26 PM »
So I don't have a back up big game rifle, but I have encore, so I'm going to buy a .270 barrel, and I'm thinking about shooting 160 gr partitions. Any input??
nuke the gray whales for jesus!

Offline 724wd

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 3884
  • Location: Spokane
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2016, 08:37:14 PM »
why so heavy?  140's shoot REALLY good out of a .270.

Offline PlateauNDN

  • Y.A.R. Medicine Man
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 10691
  • Location: God's Country
  • R.I.P. Colockumelk 20130423. Semper Fi!
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2016, 08:43:47 PM »
My .270 loves the blue box of federals 140 gr. Knocked down deer and elk no problem.
If you can read thank a teacher, If you can read in English thank a Marine! 
Not as Lean, Just as Mean, Still a Marine!
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother!

"Around this camp, there's only one Chief; the rest are Indians!"

"Give me 15 more minutes, I was dreaming of Beavers!"

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39189
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2016, 08:48:01 PM »
The 160 grain Partitions will do great. It's just like using 180's in the 30/06. The only reason I might be reluctant to try them in the Encore, is that recoil might be a little too much.

Offline yakimarcher

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 707
  • Location: Naches, WA
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2016, 08:53:45 PM »
Most .270 barrels don't have enough twist for a 160.

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11323
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2016, 08:54:08 PM »
My .270 loves the 150 partitions.  I would imagine 160s would work fine also if you can get the rifle to shoot them.  Any of the 140 /150 /160 partitions would be devastating on any game in North America out a .270.  good luck and if you get the 160s to work...make sure to post your recipe. 

Offline NRA4LIFE

  • Site Sponsor
  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 6057
  • Location: Maple Valley
  • Groups: NRA
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2016, 09:22:47 PM »
What Yakimarcher said.  A little much for a .270.  I have never reloaded past 150.  I prefer 130 for deer.
Look man, some times you just gotta roll the dice

Offline theleo

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1212
  • Location: Kennewick
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #7 on: November 02, 2016, 07:39:16 AM »
I wouldn't go heavier than 150 grains, there's just no real good reason to unless you're just trying to slow it down for brush hunting.

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21744
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #8 on: November 02, 2016, 07:47:45 AM »
The 160 grain Partitions will do great. It's just like using 180's in the 30/06. The only reason I might be reluctant to try them in the Encore, is that recoil might be a little too much.
To be more precise, a 160 grain out of a 270 is closer to a 200 grain out of a 30 caliber (.308). Using sectional density as the standard, the equivalent bullet weight to a 180 grain in 30 caliber would be a 145 grain in .277.

I would personally choose something lighter than 160 in a 270, but if it shoots well it should work fine.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39189
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #9 on: November 02, 2016, 08:05:36 AM »
The 160 grain Partitions will do great. It's just like using 180's in the 30/06. The only reason I might be reluctant to try them in the Encore, is that recoil might be a little too much.
To be more precise, a 160 grain out of a 270 is closer to a 200 grain out of a 30 caliber (.308). Using sectional density as the standard, the equivalent bullet weight to a 180 grain in 30 caliber would be a 145 grain in .277.

I would personally choose something lighter than 160 in a 270, but if it shoots well it should work fine.

Yeah, I just meant it's like using the heaviest that's generally available. Bullet weight isn't really that critical. I say use whatever you have confidence in. It could also be said that there's no need to use 130 grain bullets, or 150 grain, just use 140 grain. It's really just personal preference along with finding a bullet that shoots good groups in a particular rifle.

Offline jdb

  • the illustious potentate
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3785
  • Location: selah
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #10 on: November 02, 2016, 08:22:48 AM »
I have a semi custom model 700 in .270 as my primary hunting rifle. I shoot 130 grain accubonds out of it, my idea here is I stick with the .270 to simplify life in terms of on hand components i.e. I already have 100's of brass. But I want something ballistically dissimilar. This would primarily be a truck gun/back up gun. I thought that with there long heavy profile they'd penetrate like no tomorrow.
nuke the gray whales for jesus!

Offline Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21744
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #11 on: November 02, 2016, 08:30:11 AM »
Bullet choices and weights will be debated forever, as long as campfires exist.

The use of "heavy for caliber" bullets like a 160 grain in .277 caliber made a lot of sense in the days when bullets did hold together well. Most big game bullets today are designed to retain more weight: some as high as 100%. This allows the use of lighter bullets that can still penetrate, if that is your preference. Some hunters prefer bullets that enter, quickly expand, and expend all their energy inside the animal.

The adage that slow, heavy bullets "bust brush" better than lighter, faster bullets has been disproven.

Pick the bullet you like, shoot it enough at targets to understand its trajectory and accuracy limitations, and go hunting.

Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Firedogg

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 987
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #12 on: November 02, 2016, 11:16:27 AM »
 If you are thinking more penetration look to bullet construction, not weight. The Barnes TSX/TTSX gives great penetration along with full mushrooming and weight retention.
  Modern design bullets are doing some interesting things for our old calibers changing the way we used to think about them.
There is no greater respect to have for wildlife than to harvest an animal fairly and use it's flesh to feed your family.  ~me

Offline theleo

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1212
  • Location: Kennewick
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2016, 11:33:10 AM »
A 160 Partition will penetrate like crazy but no more than a 130 grain TTSX or a 150 grain A-frame.

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39189
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: .270 160 gr
« Reply #14 on: November 02, 2016, 11:34:13 AM »
A 160 Partition will penetrate like crazy but no more than a 130 grain TTSX or a 150 grain A-frame.

That's true but it might make a bigger hole.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Vashon Island deer tag by bowhunter_1
[Today at 02:59:43 PM]


Is FS70 open? by addicted1
[Today at 02:49:18 PM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by Feathernfurr
[Today at 02:33:24 PM]


Basin elk by nwwanderer
[Today at 02:27:27 PM]


2025 OILS! by jackelope
[Today at 01:47:31 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Today at 01:02:45 PM]


Big J's Powder list by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 12:59:31 PM]


Getting back into dogs by WALLEYEGUY
[Today at 12:55:09 PM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by phildobaggins
[Today at 11:31:27 AM]


Muzzy Mission Quality!!! by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 11:26:18 AM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by Knocker of rocks
[Today at 11:07:04 AM]


Bow mount trolling motors by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 10:22:59 AM]


49 degrees north late Moose tag by vandeman17
[Today at 09:05:21 AM]


Stillaguamish 448 QD rifle tag by jason stevens
[Today at 09:05:09 AM]


Bear behavior by dylan34_36
[Today at 08:51:28 AM]


Idaho Unit 31 Late Rifle! by Sliverslinger
[Today at 08:36:10 AM]


Machias' 2025 Spring Bear/Northern Idaho by Machias
[Today at 07:52:44 AM]


Norway pass Elk by hunterednate
[Today at 07:44:13 AM]


Early controlled hunt rifle tag Lemhi Range by Shooter4
[Today at 07:29:56 AM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by RB
[Today at 03:13:07 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal