collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wireless Trail cameras  (Read 13837 times)

Offline davk

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 208
  • Location: SnoCo
  • Groups: NRA, GOA
Re: Wireless Trail cameras
« Reply #30 on: November 28, 2016, 12:49:21 PM »
I guess I have a poor imagination, can someone explain to me how they can be abused?  The only real advantage is I don't have to drive 100 miles or further to check them and I don't have to leave my scent in the area to check them.  Other than that can someone explain the thinking behind unfair advantage.  Thanks!
  By putting 4 or 5 out in an area and kicking back at camp and waiting for your prey to pass by one of them.
Exactly that.  Along with slightly more involved versions of the same concept.  Basically they can be used to alert a "hunter" of game in the area.   The use you explain is exactly where I would benefit greatly from them and see them as a huge plus.  I really dont understand the reason why B&C would not accept animals taken with the use in scouting.  Not that I would personally give a ... if an animal I killed was in a record book.  Unless they have a very broad definition of scouting which would cover any sort of non actively hunting activities during the hunting season or something.  Like hunting unit A and having a camera in unit B.  Getting a picture from the camera in unit B is considered scouting ... and then you drive to unit B to hunt that animal.

Offline davk

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 208
  • Location: SnoCo
  • Groups: NRA, GOA
Re: Wireless Trail cameras
« Reply #31 on: November 28, 2016, 12:56:55 PM »
Quote
Boone and Crockett Club and the Pope and Young Club. According to the presidents of both B&C (Tony Schoonen) and P&Y (Jim Willems), neither have any issue with the use of traditional trail cameras that require hunters to visit the camera site to retrieve data cards or film (as far as fair chase goes). But, both oppose the use of cameras that transmit images directly to a location where they may be viewed by a hunter. Animals taken with the use of a direct transmit camera are not eligible for inclusion in their record books. Schoonen relayed this statement:

“Trophies taken with the use of trail cameras, including scouting, are eligible for entry in B&C, but only if the hunter has to manually remove film and/or a card from the trail camera itself to retrieve the images. Trophies taken with the use of trail cameras, including scouting, that transmit images to a computer/base station for viewing are not eligible for entry in B&C.”

There is clearly a way for these to be abused during hunting season, but I don't get the opposition to them otherwise.  I wish people would have more of an open mind.  I have to dedicate entire days, if not entire weekends, and put in 20+ miles to check my cameras.  Should I claim not fair chase for people who hunt private land and can check all their cameras before their morning cup of coffee gets cold?

This is a ridiculous stance by B&C.

What about guys who have property in other states?  Or countries?
I get that it can be abused during season, but the easy way around it is to limit their use for entry to outside of season, not just generally.
Yeah I feel the exact same way.  I don't get the idea behind it.  I guess if you don't have an abundance of excess time, your not a true hunter.

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 19037
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: Wireless Trail cameras
« Reply #32 on: November 28, 2016, 05:08:47 PM »
I guess I have a poor imagination, can someone explain to me how they can be abused?  The only real advantage is I don't have to drive 100 miles or further to check them and I don't have to leave my scent in the area to check them.  Other than that can someone explain the thinking behind unfair advantage.  Thanks!
  By putting 4 or 5 out in an area and kicking back at camp and waiting for your prey to pass by one of them.

 :chuckle:  ok....
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline Mark Brenckle

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 1568
  • Location: Arlington
Re: Wireless Trail cameras
« Reply #33 on: November 28, 2016, 06:07:06 PM »
I guess I have a poor imagination, can someone explain to me how they can be abused?  The only real advantage is I don't have to drive 100 miles or further to check them and I don't have to leave my scent in the area to check them.  Other than that can someone explain the thinking behind unfair advantage.  Thanks!
  By putting 4 or 5 out in an area and kicking back at camp and waiting for your prey to pass by one of them.

 :chuckle:  ok....
Honestly I just made that up, I've never looked into it.  :dunno:  :chuckle:

Offline Machias

  • Trapper
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 19037
  • Location: Worley, ID
Re: Wireless Trail cameras
« Reply #34 on: November 28, 2016, 07:59:44 PM »
 :tup:
Fred Moyer

When it's Grim, be the GRIM REAPER!

Offline Becky

  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 5481
  • Location: Roy
Re: Wireless Trail cameras
« Reply #35 on: November 29, 2016, 01:59:54 PM »
I know there's a law about any type of flying/drone use/scouting or even being up in the air on the same day you hunt. I don't remember the wording. I think in some states that prohibit live-feed cameras, it's along those lines, being notified immediately without you physically being there to see the animal yourself.

I'm not against using them, just posting the information we've read about them in the past is all.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Wyoming 112 or 81 deer by Mtnwalker
[Today at 08:42:41 PM]


Where do you keep them by BigredRusch
[Today at 08:29:03 PM]


Where should i hunt turkeys? Can anyone help? by Birdguy
[Today at 08:16:56 PM]


MOA or MRAD, & Why? by craigapphunt
[Today at 07:29:12 PM]


School Me On Fish Finders by MADMAX
[Today at 07:12:07 PM]


Wyoming 2026, who's in? by Stein
[Today at 06:08:33 PM]


Yakima Buffalo by boneaddict
[Today at 05:31:08 PM]


2026 Coyotes by Angus
[Today at 03:59:28 PM]


Flooded Corn: Senator Calls USFW To Conduct Formal Study by full choke
[Today at 03:25:57 PM]


Know Where To Hunt Club by johnsc6
[Today at 12:44:11 PM]


35 whelen by dasbear
[Today at 12:33:12 PM]


Wader advice by Alex4200
[Today at 11:27:38 AM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by Bearhunter
[Today at 08:47:44 AM]


19th Annual Banquet Columbia County Chapter of OHA by Brute
[Today at 08:47:37 AM]


First fur sale Idaho results by JakeLand
[Today at 08:13:20 AM]


European skull personalized wall state mounts by fire*guy
[Today at 06:29:53 AM]


Fur Harvesters shipping by Frank The Tank
[Yesterday at 09:32:29 PM]


Last duck hunt of the season by bigdub257
[Yesterday at 08:34:34 PM]


Peak 44 or AG Composite? by highside74
[Yesterday at 08:14:21 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal