collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Snub noses  (Read 6207 times)

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #15 on: November 28, 2016, 01:22:17 PM »
I occasionally carry a S&W .38.
The charter arms bulldog has always seemed interesting to me but reviews aren't the greatest.

The Charter Arms and Taurus revolvers are known to have an issue with the ratchet gear wearing down but not out. I would be a little wary of them for a carry weapon.

I've experienced a few issues with friends' Taurus guns. I wouldn't CCW one if it was free AND they paid me  :twocents:

Offline Buzz2401

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1207
  • Location: Shelton
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #16 on: November 28, 2016, 01:25:26 PM »
Own about 30 different pistols, most autos.  My everyday carry is a S&W snubby. 

Offline JJB11B

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4496
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #17 on: November 28, 2016, 03:57:31 PM »
I occasionally carry a S&W .38.
The charter arms bulldog has always seemed interesting to me but reviews aren't the greatest.

The Charter Arms and Taurus revolvers are known to have an issue with the ratchet gear wearing down but not out. I would be a little wary of them for a carry weapon.

I've experienced a few issues with friends' Taurus guns. I wouldn't CCW one if it was free AND they paid me  :twocents:
I have had 2 Taurus trackers that have done that and my Dad had one too, they're garbage and I wouldn't keep one if it was gifted to me.
"Pain heals, chicks dig scars, glory lasts forever."
Shane Falco

Offline Bean Counter

  • Site Sponsor
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 13624
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #18 on: November 28, 2016, 04:30:49 PM »
They can be ok for practice and plinking, I just wouldn't make it my EDC  :twocents:

Offline Igor

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 4101
  • Location: Monroe, WA
  • Hunter
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #19 on: November 28, 2016, 04:49:36 PM »
S&W 342PD.  At 10.8 oz., it's the lightest J frame available.  Will handle +P loads.........not fun to shoot, but then again it's for concealed carry, not target shooting.
molṑn labé

USAF
   6987th Security Squadron
   6947th Security Squadron
   6918th RSM

Offline Badhabit

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 1235
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #20 on: November 28, 2016, 05:08:33 PM »
I've got a S&W model 49. Not rated for +P but I love the shrouded hammer and that it's a SA/DA. There might be some other alloy weapons that are lighter, but for the past 30 yrs it's been there when I needed it, which so far I haven't needed it.

Offline b23

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3312
  • Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #21 on: November 28, 2016, 05:08:48 PM »
I've had both the S&W 442 and Ruger LCR, I like the looks of the 442 better but I can't say that one is any better than the other as I think they are both very good CCW.  My wife carries a LCR 38spl+p everyday and she liked the LCR better so that's what she got. 

Personally, for their intended purpose, I don't think you could go wrong with either one.

Offline jdb

  • the illustious potentate
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3795
  • Location: selah
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #22 on: November 28, 2016, 05:53:40 PM »
I look at a 442 today. Very light. Very comfortable in the hand. Not sure about the dao? I'm thinking maybe a 438. Shrouded hammer so good for pocket carry but still single action capable
nuke the gray whales for jesus!

Offline theleo

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 1212
  • Location: Kennewick
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #23 on: November 28, 2016, 06:24:42 PM »
Just get a .44 special Mountain Lite.

Offline b23

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 3312
  • Location: Spokane Wa.
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #24 on: November 28, 2016, 06:31:23 PM »
I look at a 442 today. Very light. Very comfortable in the hand. Not sure about the dao? I'm thinking maybe a 438. Shrouded hammer so good for pocket carry but still single action capable

That's understandable but for the intended purpose of these types of guns being CCW, not target shooting, the DAO part just doesn't matter and when that moment happens that you need to use it to protect yourself or others, I think it's doubtful you are going to bother with cocking the hammer and shooting it single action. 

Offline Idahokid

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 4
  • Location: Coeur d'alene,Idaho
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #25 on: November 28, 2016, 07:57:05 PM »
I carry a Taurus 605.Also a berreta nano.Ive owned three Taurus handguns and never had a problem with any.Maybe I'm lucky.
Don't believe everything you think.

Offline Mongo Hunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 855
  • Location: Vancouver
  • Pew Pew lifestyle
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #26 on: December 01, 2016, 06:51:26 AM »
In general I don't think Taurus makes bad firearms. I kinda put them in a similar category as Ruger. Not bad guns just inexpensive and sometimes the fit, finish and QC leave a little to be desired.

Vegetarian: Old Indian word for Bad Hunter.

Offline jdb

  • the illustious potentate
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3795
  • Location: selah
Re: Snub noses
« Reply #27 on: December 01, 2016, 07:53:06 AM »
I have owned 5 taurus revolvers and 3 smith and wessons. I had one taurus break a spring. Took it in, had it fixed. Worked fine after that. I had one smith break a spring. Same story. I will say that the smith's fit and finish is far superior
nuke the gray whales for jesus!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 10:04:54 PM]


Pocket Carry by bb76
[Yesterday at 08:44:00 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Yesterday at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 07:07:33 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Yesterday at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[July 03, 2025, 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[July 03, 2025, 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal