SB 5795 - More backdoor gun control

[fish vacuum]

Just gotta keep poking at those evil gun owners.

[hunter399]

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/assault-weapons-not-protected-second-amendment-federal-appeals-court-rules-n724106

This does not have anything to do with washington,but is a huge slap in the face to our 2 amendment rights and think anybody that's concerned about your guns taken a ways shoulnd read it.

[Boss .300 winmag]

That's not good.

[Windwalker]

Done- (should have mentioned it would threaten the lives of kittens and babies)

Liability insurance requirement to exercise a fundamental civil right?
Compared to car insurance. Driving is a privilege, owning a firearm is a protected right. Criminals don’t pay attention to driving laws any more than they do gun laws. This also focuses a burden on financially stressed “disparity of force" individuals including elderly, physically disadvantaged and low income families.
I strongly OPPOSE.

[biggfish]

Why is it that no one ever tried to lease any of our other rights, like having to pay a fee to for participating in a protest, or have to pay fees to invoke the 5th and remain silent. I could go on but of course society believes the 2nd amendment is outdated, but they use the first to express it and it's just as old.

Sent from my RCT6873W42 using Tapatalk

[smittyJ]

Sort of off topic but doesn't the NRA offer some sort of insurance as part of their membership?

If I remember correctly a life member will be represented in court  if a firearm is used to protect ones self.
 
There are other organisations that do the same thing.

I would bet that what they are after is liability insurance. Some one has an accident or you whack some one... how they gona fine or sue you?

Along with the free insurance, they are now offering Self Defense insurance for $165 a year, just got a notification this week.

[shotguunar]

This is a state they gives illegal aliens drivers licences.And if  I am right probably none of them carry auto insurance so endangering meand. you every day wedrive somewhere.so what I am saying is that forces us to carry uninsured driver insurance So what are they going to do make the non gun owners to carry uninsured gun insurance because we all are law abiding citizens and we will be forced into getting this insurance while the criminals running around with guns will not get it Oh my god I forgot the illegals have more rights than we do in this sanctuary state Give me a brake no wonder the tech companies want to bring in refuges from outside the country that are smarter than us Because they no the people that are running this state are retarded Oh can I use that term retarded I no its not politically correct so I will use the correct term mentally challenged

[konradcountry]

The source:
http://sdc.wastateleg.org/chase/2017/02/15/bill-proposes-liability-insurance-for-all-future-firearm-sales/

We see the destructive power of guns almost nightly on the news and yet we do not require gun owners to have any type of liability insurance. Requiring liability insurance may cause an irresponsible gun owner to exercise extra care in preventing firearm-related accidents, especially in tragic accidents involving children

So she isn't even sure it will change anything.

If a child is accidentally shot he would already be covered under an existing medical policy.

As usual this doesn't make any sense. And someone dumb enough to leave a loaded gun around a child is not going to be motivated by a insurance policy.

[wooltie]

Just want is the purpose and intended result of this bill?

[sumpnz]

Just want is the purpose and intended result of this bill?

To increase the hassle factor and expense of being a gun owner to the point that a very large percentage stop being gun owners.  As the number of gun owners dwindle they become an ever smaller political force.  Once that drops past a certain point they can enforce even more restrictions until finally, like in (formerly) Great Britain, there are essentially no legal gun owners left and the gun culture is for all practical purposes dead.  Then they just go ahead and ban ownership outright.

That it won't actually work out like that doesn't occur to them.  Or really even matter to them.  Whatever reduces the prevalence of the gun culture is a win as far as they're concerned.

[Elkaholic daWg]

Isn't the ACLU CURRENTLY fighting a law that discriminates against the poor just as THIS ONE would? ....And DONE!!

[arees]

I sent my response.  This is another attempt to restrict honest people while doing nothing to stop criminals with a layer of discriminating against the poor thrown in for good measure.

[timberfaller]

  Done!

[Sitka_Blacktail]

Heard an idiot legislator last night on Komo news talking about the attempt in this state to ban "assault weapons". His claim was that the bullets from "assault weapons" Travel up to two times faster than bullets from non "assault weapons" and can pierce body armor because of that.

That is the sort of distorted facts and logic we are up against.

[Special T]

Heard an idiot legislator last night on Komo news talking about the attempt in this state to ban "assault weapons". His claim was that the bullets from "assault weapons" Travel up to two times faster than bullets from non "assault weapons" and can pierce body armor because of that.

That is the sort of distorted facts and logic we are up against.

You can't fix stupid! Always amazed they run thier mouths on "news" programs when all they do is display how ignorant and lack the ability to do any kind of investigative reporting.