collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'  (Read 3928 times)

Offline Dave Workman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 2947
  • Location: In the woods, by the big tree
"The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted." - D.H. Lawrence

Offline whacker1

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 5816
  • Location: Spokane
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2017, 06:44:46 PM »
senator pearson wanted feedback, and he got it from us.  good to see his response.

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2017, 06:48:09 PM »
I read it if its been knocked down great.Im not reading anywhere in here where they are saying that though  :dunno:  What was the vote numbers?The only thing i see is that Pearson is leading the effort.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10624
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2017, 08:15:42 PM »
I read it if its been knocked down great.Im not reading anywhere in here where they are saying that though  :dunno:  What was the vote numbers?The only thing i see is that Pearson is leading the effort.
The bill hasn't gone to a vote, it hasn't even made it out of committee.

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2017, 08:20:49 PM »
Thanks that's what i was seeing,someone jumping the gun a little here
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44701
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2017, 06:24:01 AM »
I don't think anyone's implying their budget request has been denied. But it is good to see Pearson's got the right track. I'd much prefer to see LE admin cleaned up as a result, whether there's a fee increase or not.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline ctwiggs1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 4219
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2017, 06:32:22 AM »
I don't think anyone's implying their budget request has been denied. But it is good to see Pearson's got the right track. I'd much prefer to see LE admin cleaned up as a result, whether there's a fee increase or not.

Kind of.  He is acknowledging some issues it looks like but I don't see him saying anything other than "leadership problem".  Is he just calling for more fiscal responsibility?  I don't think that'll solve the issues to be honest.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 44701
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • WWC, NRA Life, WFW, NAGR, RMEF, WSB, NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2017, 07:12:19 AM »
I don't think anyone's implying their budget request has been denied. But it is good to see Pearson's got the right track. I'd much prefer to see LE admin cleaned up as a result, whether there's a fee increase or not.

Kind of.  He is acknowledging some issues it looks like but I don't see him saying anything other than "leadership problem".  Is he just calling for more fiscal responsibility?  I don't think that'll solve the issues to be honest.
No, I believe that he understands there are some real leadership problems, especially in LE and the director. Dave, do you have some insight on this please?.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25034
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2017, 07:25:28 AM »
It's nice to see some one in  the legislature take notice of the problems in wdfw leadershio
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Rob

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4838
  • Location: Sandpoint ID
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #9 on: March 27, 2017, 09:43:32 AM »
The two best quotes from that article:

“The agency wanted to correct this by initiating a hefty increase in hunting and fishing license fees without the promise for more opportunities,”

and my favorite:

“The problem is not a money problem, it’s a leadership problem,” Pearson said.

Need to run this like a business.  There is plenty of money available.
_______________________________________
Sit tall in the saddle, hold you head up high.
Keep your eyes fixed on where the trail meets the sky.
Live like you ain’t afraid to die.
Just sit back and enjoy your ride
  - Chris Ledoux

Offline Dave Workman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 2947
  • Location: In the woods, by the big tree
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #10 on: March 27, 2017, 06:43:39 PM »
The two best quotes from that article:

“The agency wanted to correct this by initiating a hefty increase in hunting and fishing license fees without the promise for more opportunities,”

and my favorite:

“The problem is not a money problem, it’s a leadership problem,” Pearson said.

Need to run this like a business.  There is plenty of money available.



BINGO!
This has been a problem with WDFW since the early 1980s when it became the WDFW.  Remember it used to be the GAME Department, but that changed when they decided the title of the agency had to more greatly reflect the diversity of what they do.

For sportsmen, it became "LESS IS THE NEW MORE." 

Look at the pages and pages of special permit hunts in the game regs. The agency could reduce these considerably and simply open opportunities for people without having to apply for a permit. This appears designed to get the hunting public used to applying for permits, perhaps with the idea that one day, it will all be permit hunting. You don't get drawn, well, better luck next year.

A couple of years ago, the commission okayed an expansion of the grouse bag limit to four a day. But a year or two later, the regulation was cut back to only three birds of one species and the fourth had to be of a different species (i.e. 3 blues, 1 ruffed). It's chippy stuff like this that makes people really dislike the agency.

It's getting late in the session, but there could still be time to pass a bill out of committee.
"The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted." - D.H. Lawrence

Offline Dave Workman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 2947
  • Location: In the woods, by the big tree
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #11 on: March 27, 2017, 06:47:00 PM »
It's nice to see some one in  the legislature take notice of the problems in wdfw leadershio

Yeah, it's only taken what, 30 years or so?

 :dunno: :chuckle:
"The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted." - D.H. Lawrence

Offline bigtex

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 10624
Re: WHAM! 'Senate Leaders Reject WDFW Fee Increase'
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2017, 07:16:15 PM »
The two best quotes from that article:

“The agency wanted to correct this by initiating a hefty increase in hunting and fishing license fees without the promise for more opportunities,”

and my favorite:

“The problem is not a money problem, it’s a leadership problem,” Pearson said.

Need to run this like a business.  There is plenty of money available.



BINGO!
This has been a problem with WDFW since the early 1980s when it became the WDFW.  Remember it used to be the GAME Department, but that changed when they decided the title of the agency had to more greatly reflect the diversity of what they do.

For sportsmen, it became "LESS IS THE NEW MORE." 

Look at the pages and pages of special permit hunts in the game regs. The agency could reduce these considerably and simply open opportunities for people without having to apply for a permit. This appears designed to get the hunting public used to applying for permits, perhaps with the idea that one day, it will all be permit hunting. You don't get drawn, well, better luck next year.

A couple of years ago, the commission okayed an expansion of the grouse bag limit to four a day. But a year or two later, the regulation was cut back to only three birds of one species and the fourth had to be of a different species (i.e. 3 blues, 1 ruffed). It's chippy stuff like this that makes people really dislike the agency.

It's getting late in the session, but there could still be time to pass a bill out of committee.
The grouse regs change was actually closer to 5-7 years, not a year or two.

It's also well known the increase to 4 was not because the grouse population supported the increase but rather because a commissioner wanted it...

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Norway pass Elk by Dark2Dark
[Yesterday at 11:51:46 PM]


Bear behavior by lewy
[Yesterday at 11:51:23 PM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by Platensek-po
[Yesterday at 11:39:03 PM]


Boat registration by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:22:29 PM]


Norway Pass Archery Elk 2025 by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:14:45 PM]


Entiat Quality tag by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 09:05:06 PM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 09:03:40 PM]


Palouse/Mica (GMU 127) Access for Trades Work by dr.derek
[Yesterday at 08:29:53 PM]


Pearygin Quality by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:55:09 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Caveman123
[Yesterday at 07:43:44 PM]


Oregon results posted. by Caveman123
[Yesterday at 07:40:47 PM]


2025 Draw Results by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 07:27:32 PM]


Mudflow Archery by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 07:26:25 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by dilleytech
[Yesterday at 07:14:35 PM]


Rehome for GWP by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 06:43:07 PM]


Vashon Island deer tag by bowhunter_1
[Yesterday at 04:32:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal