collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Puyallup river  (Read 5748 times)

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Puyallup river
« on: May 06, 2017, 02:16:23 PM »
Might be a dumb question but does anyone know if we are gonna be able to fish the Puyallup this summer?
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline HUNTINCOUPLE

  • Lost Somewhere on the Praire of Klickitat Co. Chasing The Elusive BENCHLEG DEERS.
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 8146
  • Location: Lyle WA, 98635
  • Yep, my avatar is from my front porch. #2835
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2017, 02:19:01 PM »
 :chuckle: :dunno:
Slap some bacon on a biscut and lets go, were burrnin daylight!

Most peoples health is a decision not a condition?

Kill your television!  ICEMAN SAID TO!

Life Member of Hunting  Washington  Forum.

Time in the woods is more important than timing the moon.

Offline hunthard

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 596
  • Location: western wa
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2017, 03:46:15 PM »
We better, the forecast is for 3800 Kings and 20,00 Silvers....

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #3 on: May 06, 2017, 03:49:54 PM »
Yep,That got my interest peaked.I remember it wasn't done correctly 2 seasons ago and that's why i'm trying to find out if were passed that or not.The agreement,How long is it good for each time?
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2017, 06:02:24 PM »
The agreement (if you really wanna call it that) is done annually I believe.

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2017, 06:17:26 PM »
The agreement (if you really wanna call it that) is done annually I believe.
I thought agreement was exactly what it is called.
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline hunthard

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2016
  • Posts: 596
  • Location: western wa
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2017, 07:01:47 PM »
After last years "Bull$h!t" on the Puyallup i'm pretty sure lessons have been learned, that being said everybody gets to fish or nobody gets to fish.

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2017, 07:05:03 PM »
 :tup:
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Antlershed

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 4822
  • Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2017, 08:51:13 PM »
The agreement (if you really wanna call it that) is done annually I believe.
I thought agreement was exactly what it is called.
The tribes forcing what they want, and the state rolling over isn't my idea of an agreement.

Offline Odell

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 986
  • Location: The Dalles Oregon
  • the deuce is loose
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #9 on: May 09, 2017, 10:11:36 AM »
After speaking to one of the highest guys dealing with these issues I'd put it at 50/50
what in the wild wild world of sports???

Offline cavemann

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2014
  • Posts: 1127
  • Location: Washington
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2017, 11:37:28 AM »
word is it will be the same as last year...  Regs show it that way as well already.  Nisqually is jacked up as well, closes right when the silver run starts to heat up..  It boiled with silvers last year after they closed it.  frustrating.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16010
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #11 on: May 09, 2017, 12:00:01 PM »
Its ok the Native Americans will get their allotment
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #12 on: May 09, 2017, 06:23:59 PM »
word is it will be the same as last year...  Regs show it that way as well already.  Nisqually is jacked up as well, closes right when the silver run starts to heat up..  It boiled with silvers last year after they closed it.  frustrating.
Are the fishing regs out?
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Oh Mah

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 6614
  • Location: region 3 Montana
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #13 on: May 09, 2017, 06:25:32 PM »
After speaking to one of the highest guys dealing with these issues I'd put it at 50/50
Thanks Odell,could you explain please what you've heard?Are they thinking of closing it to non tribal again or for good?
"Boss of the woods"
(this is in reference to the biggie not me).

Offline Odell

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 986
  • Location: The Dalles Oregon
  • the deuce is loose
Re: Puyallup river
« Reply #14 on: May 11, 2017, 08:54:13 AM »
After speaking to one of the highest guys dealing with these issues I'd put it at 50/50
Thanks Odell,could you explain please what you've heard?Are they thinking of closing it to non tribal again or for good?

Closed to non-tribal is what he thinks could happen.Tribes are gonna fish.
what in the wild wild world of sports???

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by Karl Blanchard
[Today at 01:12:28 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by lonedave
[Today at 12:58:20 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by washingtonmuley
[Today at 12:00:55 PM]


MA 6 EAST fishing report? by washingtonmuley
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


Kings by Gentrys
[Today at 11:05:40 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by High Climber
[Today at 10:32:52 AM]


2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Today at 05:27:26 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 02:08:31 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal