Free: Contests & Raffles.
The verdict is in and it's clear that mule deer hunters would love to see more opportunity to hunt predators and WDFW loves revenue, another idea came to mind that could to be a great compromise. How would everyone feel about increasing the spring bear quota? Lets say the WDFW adds 500 special permits for spring bear tags and spreads them across different east cascade foothills gmu's but in order to get the WDFW on board with this here's the kicker: If drawn residents could purchase the tags for $222.00 (the cost of a non-resident bear tag). Also, if you punch your tag this would count as your eastern Washington bear and you could no longer hunt bear in the fall unless you headed west. The current spring bear tags we have in place would stay the same and still cost the normal $24 for residents. In MeatEater podcast episode 68 Steve talks with Pat Durkin about how a higher percentage of fawns are killed in the spring by bears than coyotes. They are in Wisconsin and I'm unsure if it is the same here in Washington but I'd like to hear some opinions on this.
They're giving bounties on wolves in Idaho, albeit indirectly. I don't need a direct bounty from WDFW, but if mule deer groups want to help they could do something like the co-op in Idaho.Maybe I shouldn't use the word "bounty" and substitute incentive instead. found it, this is what I'm talking about when I say bountyhttps://www.foundationforwildlifemanagement.org/
"If you want to have meaningful impact on recruitment of older age class deer, you HAVE to provide more escapement. This comes through restricted access, shorter seasons, reduced hunter numbers, or a combination thereof. There is no free lunch."How about through aggressive predator, especially lion, reduction? How about 4x minimum? Why won't you accept these as viable options? If the only tactics we bring to the table is the elimination of hunter opportunity, then we and our sport is doomed.
I wish someone would explain to me how you build the herd with APR. Last I heard bucks don't give birth unless you are telling me does are going unbred. Are they?
The early 1900's have like zero relevance to today
Quote from: Humptulips on November 28, 2017, 03:58:22 PMI wish someone would explain to me how you build the herd with APR. Last I heard bucks don't give birth unless you are telling me does are going unbred. Are they?As previously mentioned...APR is allowing for some bucks to survive. My own observations of post hunt herd composition lead me to believe there are many units where virtually no bucks would survive if there was not an APR. If no bucks survived or very, very few...you would have issues with unbred does and ultimately rapidly declining populations. I do not believe APRs are effective at increasing trophy potential...because nearly all the harvest gets shifted to the age 2 or 3+ bucks as opposed to being spread across all the age classes.
Quote from: Humptulips on November 28, 2017, 03:58:22 PMI wish someone would explain to me how you build the herd with APR. Last I heard bucks don't give birth unless you are telling me does are going unbred. Are they?As previously mentioned...APR is allowing for some bucks to survive. My own observations of post hunt herd composition lead me to believe there are many units where virtually no bucks would survive if there was not an APR. If no bucks survived or very, very few...you would have issues with unbred does and ultimately rapidly declining populations.
Oh and if we hunters harvest fewer mule deer then it will only leave more for the predators so we should continue to kill them at the exact same rate so that the population continues to decline until there aren't any deer left for the predators to get their grubby paws on. (feeling sarcastic tonight )
to get more does you need less predators