collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine  (Read 32231 times)

Offline huntnfmly

  • Trade Count: (+36)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4729
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #75 on: August 27, 2020, 06:14:31 AM »
That's good news
I'm your dam tour guide Arnie please don’t wonder off the dam tour.
Take as many dam pictures as you want ....
Are there any dam questions ..

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14553
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #76 on: August 27, 2020, 08:36:37 AM »
I'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.

I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.

You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...
The guys I talked to that fished there were about 50/50 on building the mine.  The part of their thinking that made them not 100% against was the Prince William Sound/Exxon Valdez oil spill.  They or people they know got some kinds of settlements from Exxon after the spill.  So, the reasoning was if the mine doesn't destroy salmon, then they can still fish and maybe get in on some other income opportunities in the region; and if it does fail, then they get a settlement and go do something else.  They viewed either outcome as somewhat benefiting them.

Offline Platensek-po

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 1511
  • Location: Shelton, wa
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #77 on: August 27, 2020, 08:52:06 AM »
I don’t view the destruction of the largest wild salmon run in the world as anything but absolutely disgusting. People betting on a settlement in trade off for that are about as disgusting.
“Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.”

If you are not willing to die for freedom then take the word out of your vocabulary.

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #78 on: August 27, 2020, 09:33:21 AM »
I agree, that's a poor perspective. Not surprising though. So many people can't look beyond the end of their own personal needs/wants to see the bigger picture.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline stlusn30-06

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2019
  • Posts: 185
  • Location: Hopefully in the woods or on a river
  • Groups: Wildlife Committee of Washington, BHA
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #79 on: August 27, 2020, 09:42:15 AM »
I'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.

I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.

You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...
The guys I talked to that fished there were about 50/50 on building the mine.  The part of their thinking that made them not 100% against was the Prince William Sound/Exxon Valdez oil spill.  They or people they know got some kinds of settlements from Exxon after the spill.  So, the reasoning was if the mine doesn't destroy salmon, then they can still fish and maybe get in on some other income opportunities in the region; and if it does fail, then they get a settlement and go do something else.  They viewed either outcome as somewhat benefiting them.

This is borderline psychopathic rationale. "it might destroy a resource for all future generations, but I might get a 1 time settlement check if that worse case scenario plays out" while some corporation makes literal tons of of money. In all seriousness, if you heard these words, this is one of the sadder things I've read in a while. Willing to give up their own future for a settlement check. wtf
“There are people in my life who sometimes worry about me when I go off into the fields and streams, not realizing that the country is a calm, gracious, forgiving place and that the real dangers are found in the civilization you have to pass through to get there." - Gierach

Offline nwmein199

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 1046
  • Location: Wetside

Offline Camo

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Snohomish Co.
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #81 on: September 23, 2020, 03:50:57 PM »
Came across this blurb yesterday, don't have anymore info to back it up.

"In other news, investigative journalists, posing as investors in Pebble Mine, secretly video-taped executives at the Pebble Partnership and Northern Dynasty, as the mining executives revealed intentions and practices that contradict their public statements and their federal application for permitting."

I did find this: https://www.eenews.net/stories/1063714383
Basically flaunting their indirect leverage with the Whitehouse and selling a 20 year plan that is really 180 year plan with four mines, the way I read it.
« Last Edit: September 23, 2020, 04:03:11 PM by Camo »
Albacore, the better white meat.

Offline OutHouse

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 3304
  • Location: Cowiche WA
  • Department of Foliage, Lifetime Member
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #82 on: September 24, 2020, 11:29:34 AM »
I'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.

I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.

You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...
The guys I talked to that fished there were about 50/50 on building the mine.  The part of their thinking that made them not 100% against was the Prince William Sound/Exxon Valdez oil spill.  They or people they know got some kinds of settlements from Exxon after the spill.  So, the reasoning was if the mine doesn't destroy salmon, then they can still fish and maybe get in on some other income opportunities in the region; and if it does fail, then they get a settlement and go do something else.  They viewed either outcome as somewhat benefiting them.

Those fisherman are entitled to their own views on this, but their reasoning is abjectly weak, selfish, shortsighted, etc. etc. etc. etc.

Offline Camo

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 311
  • Location: Snohomish Co.
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #83 on: September 24, 2020, 12:53:09 PM »
Update since yesterday....
Collier Out, Shively Back In As Pebble CEO to "Advance Through Regulatory Process"
One day after the release of video tapes showing him describe his close and politically beneficial relationships with elected leaders and regulatory officials in Alaska, Pebble Limited Partnership CEO Tom Collier offered his resignation to the board of Northern Dynasty Minerals, parent company of the Pebble Limited Partnership. Northern Dynasty’s CEO Ron Thiessen, who was also caught on video discussing those relationships and Pebble’s intentions to expand the mine once permitted, offered an apology to “all Alaskans.”

Meanwhile, in the wake of a dozen secret tapes released earlier this week showing Pebble CEO Tom Collier and Northern Dynasty’s CEO Ron Thiessen contradict public statements they’ve made to media, stakeholders, and in federal permit applications, stakeholders are calling for an immediate halt to the federal permitting process.
Albacore, the better white meat.

Offline full choke

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2714
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #84 on: September 24, 2020, 01:35:50 PM »
Update since yesterday....
Collier Out, Shively Back In As Pebble CEO to "Advance Through Regulatory Process"
One day after the release of video tapes showing him describe his close and politically beneficial relationships with elected leaders and regulatory officials in Alaska, Pebble Limited Partnership CEO Tom Collier offered his resignation to the board of Northern Dynasty Minerals, parent company of the Pebble Limited Partnership. Northern Dynasty’s CEO Ron Thiessen, who was also caught on video discussing those relationships and Pebble’s intentions to expand the mine once permitted, offered an apology to “all Alaskans.”

Meanwhile, in the wake of a dozen secret tapes released earlier this week showing Pebble CEO Tom Collier and Northern Dynasty’s CEO Ron Thiessen contradict public statements they’ve made to media, stakeholders, and in federal permit applications, stakeholders are calling for an immediate halt to the federal permitting process.

Those tapes are awesome!
It is like a b-movie where the bad guy lays out his whole plan prior to ending it for the good guy. :chuckle:
You can't make this stuff up!!
« Last Edit: September 24, 2020, 01:55:17 PM by full choke »
"If you think our wars for oil are bad, wait until we are fighting for water..."

Offline Jake Dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 3832
  • Location: Des Moines
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #85 on: September 24, 2020, 01:52:23 PM »
I'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.

I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.

You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...
The guys I talked to that fished there were about 50/50 on building the mine.  The part of their thinking that made them not 100% against was the Prince William Sound/Exxon Valdez oil spill.  They or people they know got some kinds of settlements from Exxon after the spill.  So, the reasoning was if the mine doesn't destroy salmon, then they can still fish and maybe get in on some other income opportunities in the region; and if it does fail, then they get a settlement and go do something else.  They viewed either outcome as somewhat benefiting them.

Those fisherman are entitled to their own views on this, but their reasoning is abjectly weak, selfish, shortsighted, etc. etc. etc. etc.
Yes shortsighted because at the rate we are destroying the environment all of the fish will be gone soon anyway.
Environmentalist Fundamentalist

Offline Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4925
  • Location: Graham
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #86 on: September 24, 2020, 02:10:27 PM »
I'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.

I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.

You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...
The guys I talked to that fished there were about 50/50 on building the mine.  The part of their thinking that made them not 100% against was the Prince William Sound/Exxon Valdez oil spill.  They or people they know got some kinds of settlements from Exxon after the spill.  So, the reasoning was if the mine doesn't destroy salmon, then they can still fish and maybe get in on some other income opportunities in the region; and if it does fail, then they get a settlement and go do something else.  They viewed either outcome as somewhat benefiting them.

Those fisherman are entitled to their own views on this, but their reasoning is abjectly weak, selfish, shortsighted, etc. etc. etc. etc.
Yes shortsighted because at the rate we are destroying the environment all of the fish will be gone soon anyway.
That and if they were really concerned about locals having good-paying jobs they could donate their gillnet permits.
A Man's Gotta Eat

Offline kyle dillehay

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 26
  • Location: tacoma
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #87 on: September 27, 2020, 11:39:54 PM »
watch this movie if you are interested in how are public lands are at risk...


Offline Onewhohikes

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2020
  • Posts: 591
  • Location: Monroe
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #88 on: September 28, 2020, 05:57:55 AM »
Please start another thread on this topic.

Offline nwmein199

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2015
  • Posts: 1046
  • Location: Wetside
Re: Trumps EPA says NO to Pebble Mine
« Reply #89 on: October 09, 2020, 08:16:34 AM »
Meateater released a podcast about the Pebble mine with a guy name Tim Bristol that has been fighting to get the mine stopped for over 10 years. Obviously a biased interview but I think the meat eater crew does a good job of play devils advocate for the discussion.

The Pebble Limited Partnership have been selling it as the worlds largest open mine pit that will only be open for 20 years...reality is 100+ years to actually make a profit. All of this for some gold so people can keep buying crappy jewlery at Wal-mart.

https://www.themeateater.com/listen/meateater/ep-241-a-half-life-of-never


 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

New to bear hunting by JimmyHoffa
[Today at 10:39:22 PM]


AUCTION: Custom knife by Alden Cole by teanawayslayer
[Today at 10:04:12 PM]


Seeking packer OnCall for early archery unit 328 Naneum/Colockum by DeerSkin
[Today at 10:01:25 PM]


Spot lock in the salt? by hunthard
[Today at 09:38:57 PM]


Best all around muzzy (updated) by riverrun
[Today at 09:17:25 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems - FIXED! by 30.06
[Today at 09:04:01 PM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by 6haase6
[Today at 08:59:22 PM]


GPW Trail Closures by Kascade_Killer
[Today at 08:34:19 PM]


Bonaparte Lake by Birdguy
[Today at 08:26:21 PM]


More Kings! by Stein
[Today at 06:06:46 PM]


2025 Crab! by Stein
[Today at 03:05:47 PM]


Air Dryer Cherries by Stein
[Today at 02:59:12 PM]


Boundary Waters walleye trip by jackelope
[Today at 02:08:52 PM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Today at 10:08:15 AM]


Winchester model 97 will not cycle by mudflat mike
[Today at 09:29:17 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal