Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: wags on August 14, 2020, 10:07:21 PMI'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...
I'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.
Quote from: Taco280AI on August 17, 2020, 10:10:47 AMQuote from: wags on August 14, 2020, 10:07:21 PMI'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...The guys I talked to that fished there were about 50/50 on building the mine. The part of their thinking that made them not 100% against was the Prince William Sound/Exxon Valdez oil spill. They or people they know got some kinds of settlements from Exxon after the spill. So, the reasoning was if the mine doesn't destroy salmon, then they can still fish and maybe get in on some other income opportunities in the region; and if it does fail, then they get a settlement and go do something else. They viewed either outcome as somewhat benefiting them.
Update since yesterday....Collier Out, Shively Back In As Pebble CEO to "Advance Through Regulatory Process"One day after the release of video tapes showing him describe his close and politically beneficial relationships with elected leaders and regulatory officials in Alaska, Pebble Limited Partnership CEO Tom Collier offered his resignation to the board of Northern Dynasty Minerals, parent company of the Pebble Limited Partnership. Northern Dynasty’s CEO Ron Thiessen, who was also caught on video discussing those relationships and Pebble’s intentions to expand the mine once permitted, offered an apology to “all Alaskans.” Meanwhile, in the wake of a dozen secret tapes released earlier this week showing Pebble CEO Tom Collier and Northern Dynasty’s CEO Ron Thiessen contradict public statements they’ve made to media, stakeholders, and in federal permit applications, stakeholders are calling for an immediate halt to the federal permitting process.
Quote from: JimmyHoffa on August 27, 2020, 08:36:37 AMQuote from: Taco280AI on August 17, 2020, 10:10:47 AMQuote from: wags on August 14, 2020, 10:07:21 PMI'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...The guys I talked to that fished there were about 50/50 on building the mine. The part of their thinking that made them not 100% against was the Prince William Sound/Exxon Valdez oil spill. They or people they know got some kinds of settlements from Exxon after the spill. So, the reasoning was if the mine doesn't destroy salmon, then they can still fish and maybe get in on some other income opportunities in the region; and if it does fail, then they get a settlement and go do something else. They viewed either outcome as somewhat benefiting them.Those fisherman are entitled to their own views on this, but their reasoning is abjectly weak, selfish, shortsighted, etc. etc. etc. etc.
Quote from: OutHouse on September 24, 2020, 11:29:34 AMQuote from: JimmyHoffa on August 27, 2020, 08:36:37 AMQuote from: Taco280AI on August 17, 2020, 10:10:47 AMQuote from: wags on August 14, 2020, 10:07:21 PMI'm a Bristol Bay commercial fisherman and I hope the mine is developed. I think it can be done in a way that is compatible with fish and wildlife.I have the convenience of going to the region to earn part of my living. However the vast majority of the people who live in the region are essentially welfare cases; not because they want to be, but because there are no real jobs in the region. A large mine in the area will provide real, high paying jobs for years to come.You think it can, or it has been (theoretically) proven that it can? And what if it turns out that it can't? Too late...The guys I talked to that fished there were about 50/50 on building the mine. The part of their thinking that made them not 100% against was the Prince William Sound/Exxon Valdez oil spill. They or people they know got some kinds of settlements from Exxon after the spill. So, the reasoning was if the mine doesn't destroy salmon, then they can still fish and maybe get in on some other income opportunities in the region; and if it does fail, then they get a settlement and go do something else. They viewed either outcome as somewhat benefiting them.Those fisherman are entitled to their own views on this, but their reasoning is abjectly weak, selfish, shortsighted, etc. etc. etc. etc.Yes shortsighted because at the rate we are destroying the environment all of the fish will be gone soon anyway.