collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: New Wolf Numbers  (Read 7428 times)

Offline stocmamu

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 17
  • Location: Yakima
New Wolf Numbers
« on: March 16, 2018, 02:09:10 PM »
WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/
March 16, 2018
Contact: Donny Martorello, (360) 902-2521
Ben Maletzke, (509) 592-7324
Bruce Botka, (360) 902-2262
Washington's wolf population increases for 9th straight year
OLYMPIA – Washington's wolf population continued to grow in 2017 for the ninth straight year, according to the results of an annual survey conducted by the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW).
The state was home to at least 122 wolves, 22 packs, and 14 successful breeding pairs, based on field surveys conducted over the winter by state, tribal, and federal wildlife managers.
Survey findings reflect information from aerial surveys, remote cameras, wolf tracks, and signals from radio-collared wolves.
Ben Maletzke, WDFW statewide wolf specialist, said today that all of those totals were the highest recorded since the department began conducting the surveys in 2008. Last year's survey documented 115 wolves, 20 packs, and 10 breeding pairs.
Maletzke emphasized the surveys represent "minimum counts" of wolves in Washington state, due to the difficulty of accounting for every animal – especially lone wolves without a pack.
"Here and in other states, wolf demographics are highly dynamic from year to year," Maletzke said. "The real value of these surveys is the information they provide about long-term trends, which show that our state's wolf population has grown by an annual average of 31 percent over the past decade."
Maletzke said the study documented four new packs – the Frosty, Grouse Flats, Leadpoint, and Togo packs – all located east of the Cascade Mountains. Two previously identified packs – the Skookum and Sherman packs – were not included in the pack totals for last year because the first could not be located and the second now appears to have only one member.
Wildlife managers have also been tracking the movements of a wolf in the North Cascades in Skagit County that was captured and fitted with a radio-collar last June, but so far no other wolves have been confirmed in the area, Maletzke said.
All but eliminated from western states in the last century, Washington's wolf population has rebounded since 2008, when wildlife managers documented a resident pack in Okanogan County. According the 2017 survey, 15 of the 22 known packs are located in Ferry, Stevens, and Pend Oreille counties in the northeast corner of the state.
Since 1980, gray wolves have been listed under state law as endangered throughout Washington. In the western two-thirds of the state, they are also listed as endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act.
As the state's wolf population has continued to grow, WDFW has expanded its efforts to collaborate with livestock producers, conservation groups, and local residents to prevent conflict between wolves and domestic animals, Maletzke said.
WDFW employed an array of non-lethal strategies last year to reduce conflicts, including cost-sharing agreements with 37 ranchers who took proactive steps to protect their livestock. State assistance included range riders to check on livestock, guard dogs, lighting, flagging for fences, and data on certain packs' movements.
Maletzke said five of the 22 known packs that existed in Washington at some point during 2017 were involved in at least one livestock mortality. After conducting investigations, WDFW confirmed that wolves killed at least eight cattle and injured five others last year. WDFW processed two claims totaling $3,700 to compensate livestock producers for their losses in 2017.
"We know that some level of conflict is inevitable between wolves and livestock sharing the landscape," Maletzke said. "Our goal is to minimize that conflict as the gray wolf population continues to recover."
State management of wolves is guided by the Wolf Conservation and Management Plan of 2011, along with a protocol approved by WDFW to reduce those conflicts.
Consistent with the management plan and protocol, the department used lethal action to address repeated predation on livestock by two wolf packs after non-lethal measures failed. WDFW euthanized one member of the Sherman pack, which killed four cattle and injured another during last year's summer grazing season. The department also removed two wolves from the Smackout pack, which had a history of preying on livestock in 2016 and killed two cattle and injured another during the 2017 grazing season.
The survey also documented 11 wolf mortalities in 2017 attributed to legal tribal harvest (3), legal "caught-in-the-act" shootings (2), vehicle collisions (2), and four (4) other incidents involving humans that are still under investigation.
Contributors to WDFW's annual survey include the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services program, the Confederated Colville Tribes and the Spokane Tribe of Indians.
The results will be reviewed with the State Fish and Wildlife Commission on March 17 in Wenatchee. Complete survey results will be posted on WDFW's website by March 30 at https://wdfw.wa.gov/conservation/gray_wolf/.

Offline bearpaw

  • Family, Friends, Outdoors
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 38427
  • Location: Idaho<->Colville
  • "Rather Be Cougar Huntin"
    • http://www.facebook.com/DaleDenney
    • Bearpaw Outfitters
  • Groups: NRA, SCI, F4WM, NWTF, IOGA, MOGA, CCOC, BBB, RMEF, WSTA, WSB
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2018, 04:53:54 PM »
One pack is practically living in the Colville Valley. Our friends have seen them on their place more times the last two years than I can remember. WDFW has a collar on at least one of them now that they have seen. Now a helicopter shows up quite often when the wolves are in the valley, possibly to push them out of the valley, we aren't sure, we don't know for sure they are watching the wolves, but there never used to be a chopper, and it seems to show up when the wolves are there, so that's what we are beginning to think. I told our friends their cattle are getting closer to being wolf turds every day!  :chuckle:

What's interesting, if the wolves come close to where one of the feed bales is placed, the cattle and the horses seem to avoid that bale for a day or two. They seem to know their names are backstrap, sirloin, and tenderloin to those wolves! :chuckle:

Wolves are being seen by all kinds of people anymore.
Americans are systematically advocating, legislating, and voting away each others rights. Support all user groups & quit losing opportunity!

http://bearpawoutfitters.com Guided Hunts, Unguided, & Drop Camps in Idaho, Montana, Utah, and Wash. Hunts with tags available (no draw needed) for spring bear, fall bear, bison, cougar, elk, mule deer, turkey, whitetail, & wolf! http://trophymaps.com DIY Hunting Maps are also offered

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+22)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 18744
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2018, 05:55:23 PM »
I want see the new pack map.
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Offline mfswallace

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 2653
  • Location: where I be
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2018, 06:29:35 PM »
What a joke  :bash:

Offline Taco280AI

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2013
  • Posts: 2961
  • Location: FL350
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2018, 06:55:07 PM »
By "at least 122" they really mean 400?

Offline northwesthunter84

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2014
  • Posts: 1003
  • Location: Seabeck, Wa
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2018, 08:25:44 PM »
What about the new pack the tribe documented. Wasn’t there just a press release on that one. I know I saw a thread. I don’t see that one listed.

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2018, 08:45:07 PM »
By "at least 122" they really mean 400?

1400 you mean

Offline Turner89

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 3178
  • Location: Startup, Wa
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2018, 08:51:39 PM »
What about the new pack the tribe documented. Wasn’t there just a press release on that one. I know I saw a thread. I don’t see that one listed.
:yeah:
Hard to believe with as many sightings as there seems to be, that there's only 122+-.
That's a lot of country for that small of #, and that many sightings  :dunno:
" if your a 20 year old and not a liberal, you don't have a heart. If your a 40 year old and not a conservative,  you don't have a brain"

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2018, 08:52:49 PM »
add to that statewide undocumented wolves, it's *A LOT* more than 220+  or even 400.

Offline banishd

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 144
  • Location: Monroe
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2018, 09:20:38 PM »
wow, based on how much wolf scat I came across this year I must have been hunting where half of the wolves in this state apparantly live.

Offline stocmamu

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 17
  • Location: Yakima
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2018, 10:05:36 PM »
WDFW has posted the presention for the Comission meeting tomorrow.  It has the new pack map in it:

https://wdfw.wa.gov/commission/meetings/2018/03/mar_1518_27_presentation.pdf



Offline wolfbait

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 9187
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2018, 10:12:23 PM »
What about the new pack the tribe documented. Wasn’t there just a press release on that one. I know I saw a thread. I don’t see that one listed.
:yeah:
Hard to believe with as many sightings as there seems to be, that there's only 122+-.
That's a lot of country for that small of #, and that many sightings  :dunno:


You have to go to a special school to learn how to count like WDF&wolves do.

Remember the "lookout pack with four of five wolves? For several years WDF&wolves claimed that every wolf sighted in the Okanogan was just part of the lookout pack. They ignored a pack up Bridge Cr, that was sighted the same day a pack was seen by Carlton in 2011. then there was/is a pack in McFarland Cr-Black Canyon country that  they have ignored for several years and the WDF&wolves BS lies continue. Welcome to the fraud and corruption of the wolf introduction.

122 wolves in 16 years, most of WA's wolves must be gay.

Offline Seahawk12

  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2014
  • Posts: 3046
  • Location: Kenmore
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2018, 10:17:00 PM »
This is so stupid.
An apex predator with no check or balance is gaining in numbers?
Well, color me shocked.

Why do they continue to lie about the #s?
"I make up my opinions from facts and reasoning, and not to suit any body but myself. If people don't like my opinions, it makes little difference as I don't solicit their opinions or votes."
William Tecumseh Sherman

Offline fowl smacker

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 2208
  • Location: Castle Rock
  • Groups: DU, Delta Waterfowl, RMEF, Friends of the Cowlitz
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2018, 10:20:09 PM »
I'm puzzled how WDFW can manage wolf populations and make them grow, but they can't manage deer/elk.   :dunno:

Offline Calvin Rayborn

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2013
  • Posts: 1383
  • Location: Columbia Basin
  • Groups: NRA Life Member, ATA Gold-Card Life Member
Re: New Wolf Numbers
« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2018, 12:29:51 AM »
Crazy!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Desert Sheds by C-Money
[Today at 07:12:06 AM]


Vantage Bridge by C-Money
[Today at 07:11:22 AM]


Last year putting in… by Broomd
[Yesterday at 10:42:13 PM]


Knight ridge runner by riverrun
[Yesterday at 09:47:51 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:54:26 PM]


1oz cannon balls by hookr88
[Yesterday at 07:40:51 PM]


Best/Preferred Scouting App by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 06:57:28 PM]


Any info on public land South Dakota pheasant hunts? by follow maggie
[Yesterday at 05:27:14 PM]


Oregon spring bear by Twispriver
[Yesterday at 04:32:22 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Platensek-po
[Yesterday at 01:59:06 PM]


Nevada Results by cem3434
[Yesterday at 11:18:49 AM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[May 23, 2025, 09:20:43 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[May 23, 2025, 07:35:40 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[May 23, 2025, 03:25:16 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal