Free: Contests & Raffles.
I don’t have a dog in this fight as I’ve never hunted 26 or 27, but I can tell this without a doubt;There are slobbish, non-ethical, egotistical non- resident hunters in every state in the country. There are also slobbish, non-ethical, egotistical resident hunters in every state in the country. Guess what one of the two state license plates Montana and Wyoming residents associate with slobbish, non-ethical, egotistical non-resident hunters? Idaho.Get over yourself. You keep telling yourself you did this for the deer, you did it for you. Just make sure you are proudly telling all of your fellow residents biotching about their license fee increase that you caused it. I’m pretty sure you won’t be so loud then.I’m not saying there isn’t a problem there, I’m saying going about trying to solve it this way is doing the anti’s job for them. Police your own, or we won’t exist.
I don't see the whole idaho residents are going to freak out over tag price increase deal. Resident tags are so cheap even if the doubled it wouldn't be that big of a deal. Everyone I know would happily pay more to have less out of state hunters[/quote) :yeah:just what I was thinking we don’t desperately need that money and I won’t complain at all if they raise prices a little
As someone who has lived in both Idaho and Washington, I have seen just as many residents as non-residents act in a manner that I would consider to be a joke while hunting and fishing. As far as making things better for the residents of Idaho I am fine with it. My hope is that we can do the same thing to limit non-resident fishing here in Washington. But you had better believe that if we do, the complaints from non-residents living in land locked states like Idaho will be the first ones to complain that it isn't fair.
This is a forum of experts, you seem to have it all figured out. Let’s take a time out here for a second from the derailment that occurred and get back to the actual issue. It’s all fine and good to have an opinion about issues you feel passionate about but do it constructively. Not from the position of a victim but rather a position of accountability. Ultimately what led to this decision was idaho residents taking a stand against the prostitution of the frank church wilderness and its resources. Here comes the accountability part, this was our fault as much as it was any NR’s fault for allowing the continued increase in hunter activity in said zones. It was our fault that we stood on the sidelines silent for so many years while our resources were being abused. But it is now your fault that tag quotas have been set. It is NR’s fault for degrading the hunt experience to the point where this action took place. It is NR’s fault for not caring about the resource as they should have. I’m not going to throw out a bunch of obscure statistics or make a bunch of unsubstantiated claims about commerce simply because it makes you look foolish. None of us are experts but one thing is certain we are entitled to our opinion. In closing I will share a couple of my opinions, if certain individuals on this forum are so successful during the early season then why the disdain towards this decision? You still have the same opportunity to come here in October so what does it matter to you? Instead of complaining about what you don’t have try appreciating what you do have. Secondly I wonder how the backcountry pilots survived in the mid 2000’s when hunter numbers were less than half of what they are to date. Basically what I’m saying is narrow mindedness leads to ignorance.