collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 3pt or better law  (Read 2919 times)

Offline Westsideelkchaser

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2015
  • Posts: 64
  • Location: Some where on the westside
3pt or better law
« on: May 08, 2018, 09:24:06 PM »
So with the definition of 3pt or better it does not matter now if none of the points are above the ear just as long as it has 3pts on one side over an inch long each it is legal? I know I see spikes every year that have a bunch of little inch to two inch long nobs at the base that IF I am reading it correctly are now legal.

3 Point Minimum: A 3 Pt Min elk means that
a legal elk in these GMUs must have at
least 3 antler points on one side Eye guards
are antler points when they are at least one
inch long A 1x3 and a 2x3 are legal elk in
a 3 Pt Min unit Antler restrictions apply
to all hunters during any open season

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21858
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2018, 09:44:33 PM »
The above the ear requirement has been removed.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Westsideelkchaser

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Sep 2015
  • Posts: 64
  • Location: Some where on the westside
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #2 on: May 10, 2018, 03:08:50 PM »
Thats awesome should make it a little bit easier during archery season!

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8961
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2018, 03:28:35 PM »
I'm sure someone contested that above the ear ticket and won , wdfw figured they had to change it.

Offline dreamunelk

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2049
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #4 on: May 10, 2018, 04:04:16 PM »
I'm sure someone contested that above the ear ticket and won , wdfw figured they had to change it.

Nope!

Offline JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2152
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #5 on: May 10, 2018, 04:10:09 PM »
It's good to see the change, I brought this up last year after watching the game warden show. A kid shot an elk that had 3 pts but he got cited and his elk taken away. An eyeguard counts on a deer but not an elk!?  :bash: Glad it's been updated!!
Shut up and Hunt!

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8961
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #6 on: May 10, 2018, 04:23:28 PM »
I'm sure someone contested that above the ear ticket and won , wdfw figured they had to change it.

Nope!
Any reason to why they changed it ,besides it was stupid.
You seem to know the answer enlighten us.

Offline JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2152
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #7 on: May 10, 2018, 04:32:02 PM »
Shut up and Hunt!

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8961
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #8 on: May 10, 2018, 04:46:33 PM »
So I went and looked at the link you put.
So your saying that some footage on tv may have made wdfw look bad ,and promted a rule change.
Thanks for link.

Offline JBar

  • The Family "Guide"
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 2152
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: 3pt or better law
« Reply #9 on: May 10, 2018, 05:47:28 PM »
So I went and looked at the link you put.
So your saying that some footage on tv may have made wdfw look bad ,and promted a rule change.
Thanks for link.
Not what I was implying but that's pretty funny! I think the way the rule was written along with antler point definitions was getting folks into trouble unnecessarily.
Shut up and Hunt!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

More than one shotgun? by jdb
[Today at 05:08:07 AM]


What are you cooking? by hunter399
[Today at 03:42:12 AM]


Fishin' with First-Timers by Martinhunter
[Today at 02:00:43 AM]


What gmu's in sw Washington hold elk? by Cylvertip
[Yesterday at 10:54:05 PM]


Making memories by h2ofowlr
[Yesterday at 10:29:43 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 07:53:46 PM]


My 2025 Wyoming trip by hollymaster
[Yesterday at 07:26:47 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 07:11:42 PM]


The Mysterious $200,000 by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 07:06:09 PM]


Late Muzzy WT by Jimmy33
[Yesterday at 04:35:34 PM]


East Oak smokers? by treefarmer
[Yesterday at 03:52:44 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 02:20:40 PM]


211 Mile Ambler Road Through The Brooks Range Approved by Houndhunter
[Yesterday at 02:13:34 PM]


Newbie quail hunter by Bob33
[Yesterday at 10:02:21 AM]


My Wenaha bull by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 09:30:24 AM]


CWD test results 🤤🤫 by cjjcb
[Yesterday at 09:08:26 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal