collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Oregon spray deal  (Read 4505 times)

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9152
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2020, 07:05:13 PM »
Bottom line aerial  spraying is the cheapest for reits. They will never go back to burns . If they had to stop spraying they would just plant but they will defend it to the end. $$$$ is #1 and #2 doesn't exist.
The New Oregon rules mean nothing. Come on they increased the spraying buffer around RMZs by 15 feet as if you can fly by with a helicopter and be that pinpoint. Nobody will ever check on them anyway. Don't tell me someone is going to be out there measuring that edge to make sure they only sprayed within 75 feet instead of 60 feet.
Means nothing !
Bruce Vandervort

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2020, 07:07:02 PM »
Well people aren't happy with the aerial spraying because they make a single mistake and whoops covered your house and kids.


Offline Buckhunter24

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 2228
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #17 on: February 21, 2020, 07:16:21 PM »
No doubt, I am no proponent for chemical spray. Between drift and leaching I am sure theres plenty of spillover. Ive heard claims of such a quick halflife that it is essentially gone in days but who really knows. And humptulips is right, the odds of an audit are low. The guys getting paid 14 bucks an hour to backpack spray through brush are bathing in it though.

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #18 on: February 21, 2020, 07:18:02 PM »
I am not a proponent of chemicals by any means but those pilots are really good in my experience.

Well they have already missed and coated people on the Oregon coast.

WHOOPS so sorry

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 2228
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #19 on: February 21, 2020, 07:21:02 PM »
Like I said, in my experience.

Write a letter to your congressman, Im not looking to argue.

Offline konradcountry

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2016
  • Posts: 1013
  • Location: SouthWest
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #20 on: February 21, 2020, 07:28:24 PM »
Ok I'm just pointing out that they have already tried aerial spraying and people have been covered.

If the timber companies had been careful in the first place this wouldn't be an issue.

Offline WSU

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 5530
Re: Oregon spray deal
« Reply #21 on: February 25, 2020, 09:50:20 AM »
Just saw this study.  Apparently glyphosates persist in plants that don't die for a year or more.  Wonder if ingesting glyphosates is good or bad for wildlife?

https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/the-herbicide-glyphosate-persists-in-wild-edible-plants-b-c-study?fbclid=IwAR18MaYkk217HpQHhSCGQYqoH_uUeBidsn7Kn8_TXleRP0gMm-zv0AI4FdA

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

suppressor for a 7mm-08 by dreadi
[Today at 11:06:20 PM]


Mixed bag in ND by JProper
[Today at 10:38:41 PM]


Hunting by Republic/Ferry county by trophyhunt
[Today at 10:28:47 PM]


Cougar information by JProper
[Today at 10:22:38 PM]


Wasted Bethel bull by firepin
[Today at 10:03:29 PM]


Shooting someone else's injured buck - etiquette question by blackveltbowhunter
[Today at 09:55:15 PM]


As He Lay by Dan-o
[Today at 09:14:00 PM]


Pork belly burnt ends by jrebel
[Today at 08:49:42 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by highside74
[Today at 08:46:05 PM]


Sure glad cougars are solitary animals. by Okanagan
[Today at 07:15:46 PM]


Second Chance Bull by carpsniperg2
[Today at 06:29:54 PM]


"Border Lands Conservation Act" courtesy of Mike Lee (R-UT) by cjjcb
[Today at 06:04:30 PM]


Hydrographics/dipping by elkaholic123
[Today at 06:01:30 PM]


Cougar and an elk same pic/video by NOCK NOCK
[Today at 05:16:10 PM]


Newbie quail hunter by buglebuster
[Today at 05:05:12 PM]


MOVED: Sure glad cougars are solitary animals. by bearpaw
[Today at 01:36:12 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by brokentrail
[Today at 01:23:12 PM]


Fishing the East Cape in Baja? by Rutnbuxnbulls
[Today at 01:15:40 PM]


Illustration: Skinning for a bear rug by Hunting Cowboy
[Today at 12:48:51 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal