Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: Jonathan_S on June 16, 2020, 07:42:42 PM Throat erosion from 50-75 shots on a weapon that hasn't even printed better than MOA doesn't sound like much of a loss to me. Throat erosion hasn't proven itself to be the Boogeyman that the more anal retentive make it out to be (personal opinion).Why are you asking for advice if you know so much?
Throat erosion from 50-75 shots on a weapon that hasn't even printed better than MOA doesn't sound like much of a loss to me. Throat erosion hasn't proven itself to be the Boogeyman that the more anal retentive make it out to be (personal opinion).
Quote from: 7mmfan on June 16, 2020, 03:15:25 PMAlight well you guys are shattering my grandiose plans of a perfect ladder test now. Shooting out past 400 is basically undoable within any kind of an acceptable drive of where I am. I don't know that I could provide any consistency at that range with this setup anyway. I'm just trying to get a load that is accurate for this rifle. I don't have the time to shoot 5 shoot groups in .2 gr increments, and then fiddle with seating depth on half a dozen loads. It's just not in the cards. This is one of about 3 weekend days I have available to do this until like the middle of August so I'm trying to make the best use of my time. Explain some of these other methods for refining the loads prior to heading out to me so I can evaluate and maybe implement them over the next couple days. I'll watch the Sadderlee videos tonight after kiddos bedtime, but if someone can give me a rudimentary breakdown it would be appreciated.If you don't have enough range to ladder test, or enough time to OCW test, then you'll have to velocity string test or satterlee test as mentioned above. The satterlee test can be hard to weed through if your chrony is finicky, scale inaccurate, powder stability, ect.. Thats why its easier at .5grn or higher increments. Honestly though, I end up loading and shooting just as much with a satterlee test as a .3grn OCW test. But maybe someone else has had better luck. The easiest short range test for me has been a .3grn OCW test. You can load a box of 3 shot groups or a couple boxes of 5 shot. Cool barrel between groups and tighten a seating depth test later.
Alight well you guys are shattering my grandiose plans of a perfect ladder test now. Shooting out past 400 is basically undoable within any kind of an acceptable drive of where I am. I don't know that I could provide any consistency at that range with this setup anyway. I'm just trying to get a load that is accurate for this rifle. I don't have the time to shoot 5 shoot groups in .2 gr increments, and then fiddle with seating depth on half a dozen loads. It's just not in the cards. This is one of about 3 weekend days I have available to do this until like the middle of August so I'm trying to make the best use of my time. Explain some of these other methods for refining the loads prior to heading out to me so I can evaluate and maybe implement them over the next couple days. I'll watch the Sadderlee videos tonight after kiddos bedtime, but if someone can give me a rudimentary breakdown it would be appreciated.
Quote from: Buckjunkie on June 16, 2020, 08:44:03 PMQuote from: Jonathan_S on June 16, 2020, 07:42:42 PM Throat erosion from 50-75 shots on a weapon that hasn't even printed better than MOA doesn't sound like much of a loss to me. Throat erosion hasn't proven itself to be the Boogeyman that the more anal retentive make it out to be (personal opinion).Why are you asking for advice if you know so much?Don't think Jonathan was asking for any advice, I was.Thought he was you...my bad
140 Accubond and Varget
Quote from: 7mmfan on June 16, 2020, 05:54:34 PM140 Accubond and VargetI’ve had very good results with Varget and 140 Accubonds in my Ruger American 7mm-08. Good luck with the testing and finding a good load.
Quote from: 7mmfan on June 16, 2020, 08:48:30 PMQuote from: Buckjunkie on June 16, 2020, 08:44:03 PMQuote from: Jonathan_S on June 16, 2020, 07:42:42 PM Throat erosion from 50-75 shots on a weapon that hasn't even printed better than MOA doesn't sound like much of a loss to me. Throat erosion hasn't proven itself to be the Boogeyman that the more anal retentive make it out to be (personal opinion).Why are you asking for advice if you know so much?Don't think Jonathan was asking for any advice, I was.Thought he was you...my bad
Quote from: Jason on June 16, 2020, 09:07:32 PMQuote from: 7mmfan on June 16, 2020, 05:54:34 PM140 Accubond and VargetI’ve had very good results with Varget and 140 Accubonds in my Ruger American 7mm-08. Good luck with the testing and finding a good load.Out of curiosity, what did you settle on for a load? Distance off lands?
How long is your barrel? Without tuning Quickload says 43.1 gr @ 2.870 for 2870 fps for 24” barrel is your goto. This is MAX Load Or drop to 40.2 gr @ 2700. If I knew barrel length, and velocity andLoad specs from existing load could narrow it down. My last 3 rifles have all shot quickload suggest loads < .5 moa
Well with a 22” barrel quickload says First node is down at 40.7 gr @ 2703 and you can’t reach next node of 44 gr @ 2903.I like to bump a hair before optimum so I would guess 40.9 @ 2.800 The speeds listed are the important part the grains are quickloads guesstimate since no proven load data to input.