Free: Contests & Raffles.
Now I have no personal experience, but I would have to imagine/from the videos I've watched on YouTube...Those alpine deer should follow the same rut cycle as the lower land ones do. (So about now...but every little piece of land differs per doe). The one thing I've heard is that those Mountain Bucks will move down out of the snow level to find does in heat...but as soon as they are done mating, those big boys move into knee to waist high snow to stay away from people and to have a good vantage point below them. But once again, no personal experience myself hunting high alpine deer...just from reading and video hunts. Good luck!
Which unit does he have a tag for? I have quite a few years trail camera data to prove the higher elevation bucks certainly rut later. It’s about a week behind the foothills and a solid 2 weeks behind bucks hanging around close to puget sound. There are very few places the bucks actually stay up high to rut, most of them head down by now looking for does regardless of weather. Most of my cams show truly rutting bucks and does in heat starting around the 7th, peaking the 10th-15th and still showing some chasing and rutty behavior until the 20th-25th of November. Fawns drop later as well.
Hes has the tag for 426.
I've been thinking quite a bit lately about the later rut timing in the higher elevations as well. Now, don't laugh at me, but I have my own theory on why it might be just a fuzz later. If you are up thousands of feet higher, the earth curvature comes into play. In other words, the site line toward the horizon, where the daylight emanates. The sunlight hits the high areas just a tad longer, which might be enough to lengthen the photo period just enough to make those deer up higher generally lag just behind the lowland deer. So, it would not be because of elevation itself, but rather how that significant increase in elevation interacts with the amount of light.
Deer are smart, but not sure they are quite that smart. Seems it would be easier to head for lower elevation to survive harsh conditions and find food for their fawns, rather than somehow deciding their breeding cycle to coincide with more ideal conditions later on. This brings me to an observation/question though. We have 9 hours and 48 minutes of daylight today where I live, and the peak rut for blacktail will happen in the coming days/weeks. There are only 8 hours and 38 minutes of light in Kodiak AK today. Does the Sitka deer rut generally occur at the same time as here, even though there is 70 minutes less light available there? If everything is truly only photo period based, the Sitka deer peak rut would already have happened, or they have a shorter photo period trigger to begin with.
One thing I am not understanding is why a later fawn drop would be better for survival. The later they drop, the later they are born, the less hardie they are at the onset of their first winter when they are half a year old. Why is this better? If deer can truly "adapt" to more preferable conditions for survival, then why wouldn't the harsher winter area deer be dropping sooner, so the fawns would be stronger by their first winter? Not sure I'm following the logic.