collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .45 or .50  (Read 7545 times)

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
.45 or .50
« on: May 14, 2009, 01:55:34 PM »
hey guys i have a winchester x150. it came with a .45 barrel and a .50. im comptemplating muzzleloading this year and wondered if any of you guys perfer a .45 caliber over the .50. I know the .50 is much more common. im thinking this is probably for a reason.
I tumbled him..

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50753
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2009, 01:58:51 PM »
you have to use a .50 cal for elk by law.

45 is ok for deer, but it seems most still use a .50...maybe to eliminate the need for multiple guns.
 :dunno:


not true...i apologize
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50753
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 02:01:54 PM »
did they change the law?
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50514
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2009, 02:26:29 PM »
I chose .50  why...bigger IS better.

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2009, 06:13:37 PM »
yea i was planning on going with a 50 but just wondered what u guys thought
I tumbled him..

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2009, 08:02:10 PM »
50 forsure good luck

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2009, 08:28:04 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
I tumbled him..

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2009, 08:30:34 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
that would be a blast,I would go for it,go muzzy later

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2009, 09:52:34 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
that would be a blast,I would go for it,go muzzy later


yep i just bought my modern tag. im commited. thanks for the input anyways guys.
I tumbled him..

Offline hornhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 408
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2009, 08:16:04 AM »
The Big .54 for me  :)

Offline Pat/Rick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 363
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2009, 09:56:38 AM »
.54, hell yes its a sidelock. 8)

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 12101
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2009, 10:09:02 AM »
I vote for .50.  Frankly though, I don't know much about the .45
All I do know is that when I was invited to muzzleoader elk camp for the first time, the guys told me that I had better show up with "no less than a .50 cal".
I own a .50 and a .54
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline shoot-em-dead

  • non-yar
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2533
  • Location: yacolt
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2009, 10:13:27 AM »
I have a 50 and have killed one deer with it. Dropped in its tracks. I also have a 58 that shoots a 600 grain bullet  :yike: but the origional rear sight were never mounted and the one I put on is too low to sight the gun in.
This closet is taken- go find your own

Offline Smoke Pole

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 11
  • Location: Carnation
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #13 on: May 18, 2009, 09:18:40 AM »
I shot a bear with one of my 50s using a 50 cal. slug, she went down in a heap. I shot another bear with the same rifle using a 45 cal. sabot and he also went on the wall. I didn't notice a difference in the wound channel, and neither did they. My advice is to take both barrels to the range and see which one shoots best. Accuracy trumps bullet size any day.  Dry Powder :twocents:

Offline Pat/Rick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 363
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2009, 09:11:43 AM »
 :twocents: Larger is better because the wound channel/area will not be as large as it is with modern rifle/ammunition, less hydrostatic shock. You will still get bloodshot, but it will not be as much.The wound will be more of a ugly puncture.Whatever you decide,shot placement is still the decision maker.Have fun.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

LINCOLN !! by cryder
[Today at 02:54:21 PM]


As He Lay by str8meat
[Today at 02:40:06 PM]


Afraid of the Wasteways by rainshadow1
[Today at 02:02:34 PM]


Wasted Bethel bull by firepin
[Today at 01:38:50 PM]


Late huckelberry bull by shootnrun
[Today at 11:52:52 AM]


Big old and heavy by GWP
[Today at 10:40:20 AM]


F150 Ecoboost Guys by JohnVH
[Today at 09:28:14 AM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by psr81
[Today at 09:11:36 AM]


2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by pianoman9701
[Today at 08:43:16 AM]


Youth mason tag…. Not going great by millerwheeler
[Today at 06:44:23 AM]


Late rifle season help - new hunter by Rutnbuxnbulls
[Today at 05:16:36 AM]


Any MT deer updates? by HillHound
[Yesterday at 10:59:13 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by highside74
[Yesterday at 08:23:41 PM]


117 moose Nov. tags! by Carltonhunt
[Yesterday at 07:55:02 PM]


Pearygin Quality by X-Force
[Yesterday at 06:49:45 PM]


Multi season elk by royalbull
[Yesterday at 06:03:09 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Shawn Ryan
[Yesterday at 05:23:07 PM]


Drew Pogue Quality by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 04:41:23 PM]


WWF launches public campaign "Not my WDFW" to oust Director Susewind by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 03:53:46 PM]


Snohomish River Hunting by trackmagic
[Yesterday at 03:50:14 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal