collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: .45 or .50  (Read 7584 times)

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
.45 or .50
« on: May 14, 2009, 01:55:34 PM »
hey guys i have a winchester x150. it came with a .45 barrel and a .50. im comptemplating muzzleloading this year and wondered if any of you guys perfer a .45 caliber over the .50. I know the .50 is much more common. im thinking this is probably for a reason.
I tumbled him..

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50754
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2009, 01:58:51 PM »
you have to use a .50 cal for elk by law.

45 is ok for deer, but it seems most still use a .50...maybe to eliminate the need for multiple guns.
 :dunno:


not true...i apologize
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50754
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 02:01:54 PM »
did they change the law?
"Hate speech does not exist legally in America. There's ugly speech. There's gross speech. There's evil speech. And ALL of it is protected by the First Amendment."

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50520
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2009, 02:26:29 PM »
I chose .50  why...bigger IS better.

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2009, 06:13:37 PM »
yea i was planning on going with a 50 but just wondered what u guys thought
I tumbled him..

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2009, 08:02:10 PM »
50 forsure good luck

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2009, 08:28:04 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
I tumbled him..

Offline rasbo

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 20144
  • Location: Grant county
  • In God I trust...Try taking that away from me!
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2009, 08:30:34 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
that would be a blast,I would go for it,go muzzy later

Offline lamar_hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 237
  • Location: Prescott, WA
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2009, 09:52:34 PM »
50 forsure good luck

yea thanks rasbo. im not for sure if im doing muzzle yet. i talked to a buddy today and he asked me if i would be interested in packing back in the wenahas with mules and horses to deer hunt this year so i might have to do modern. i really wish i could do both!
that would be a blast,I would go for it,go muzzy later


yep i just bought my modern tag. im commited. thanks for the input anyways guys.
I tumbled him..

Offline hornhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 408
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #9 on: May 17, 2009, 08:16:04 AM »
The Big .54 for me  :)

Offline Pat/Rick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 363
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #10 on: May 17, 2009, 09:56:38 AM »
.54, hell yes its a sidelock. 8)

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 12101
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #11 on: May 17, 2009, 10:09:02 AM »
I vote for .50.  Frankly though, I don't know much about the .45
All I do know is that when I was invited to muzzleoader elk camp for the first time, the guys told me that I had better show up with "no less than a .50 cal".
I own a .50 and a .54
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline shoot-em-dead

  • non-yar
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 2533
  • Location: yacolt
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #12 on: May 17, 2009, 10:13:27 AM »
I have a 50 and have killed one deer with it. Dropped in its tracks. I also have a 58 that shoots a 600 grain bullet  :yike: but the origional rear sight were never mounted and the one I put on is too low to sight the gun in.
This closet is taken- go find your own

Offline Smoke Pole

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 11
  • Location: Carnation
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #13 on: May 18, 2009, 09:18:40 AM »
I shot a bear with one of my 50s using a 50 cal. slug, she went down in a heap. I shot another bear with the same rifle using a 45 cal. sabot and he also went on the wall. I didn't notice a difference in the wound channel, and neither did they. My advice is to take both barrels to the range and see which one shoots best. Accuracy trumps bullet size any day.  Dry Powder :twocents:

Offline Pat/Rick

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 363
Re: .45 or .50
« Reply #14 on: May 19, 2009, 09:11:43 AM »
 :twocents: Larger is better because the wound channel/area will not be as large as it is with modern rifle/ammunition, less hydrostatic shock. You will still get bloodshot, but it will not be as much.The wound will be more of a ugly puncture.Whatever you decide,shot placement is still the decision maker.Have fun.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Aladdin unit 111 mule deer quality tag by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 10:53:40 PM]


What are you cooking? by Pnwrider
[Today at 10:27:08 PM]


My 2025 Montana Buck by JDArms1240
[Today at 10:18:25 PM]


Break my heart - Archery World is closing by Ric0
[Today at 08:23:29 PM]


GM 6.6l gas 6 speed vs. 10 speed? by Birdguy
[Today at 08:15:47 PM]


Where to find hunting mentors/etc in western wa (archery) by high_hunter
[Today at 08:14:54 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by MADMAX
[Today at 08:10:14 PM]


AMMO 6.5 PRC 143 Gr ELD-X Hornady by dblungshot
[Today at 06:38:26 PM]


Spotting scope mounting plate by Crunchy
[Today at 04:36:19 PM]


High n Dry gear by Pete112288
[Today at 03:30:29 PM]


Pants for wet brush? by Humptulips
[Today at 03:06:03 PM]


My 2025 Wyoming trip by REHJWA
[Today at 01:03:15 PM]


Bobcat Scent Lures on the Westside by Humptulips
[Today at 11:41:38 AM]


What are some good 12 ga factory loads for predators? by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:22:03 AM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Falcon
[Today at 09:02:38 AM]


Couple crazy Montana bucks by Buckhunter24
[Today at 08:27:26 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal